心理发展与教育 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 588-594.
夏依婷1, 蒋军1, 张庆林1,2
XIA Yi-ting1, JIANG Jun1, ZHANG Qing-lin1,2
摘要: 已有研究采用掩蔽启动范式证明了负相容效应的存在,但目前对于负相容效应的产生是否依赖于掩蔽刺激还存在激烈的争议。实验共32名大学生被试,采用12个选自汉语情感词语系统的汉字词语为材料,在显示屏刷新率为70HZ的无掩蔽启动范式下操纵启动与目标的时间间隔,让被试对目标词语的效价做出按键反应,记录被试对目标的反应时和错误率。本研究试图基于该时间进程下负相容效应发生的关键点来研究上述争议。结果发现:(1)无掩蔽范式下也存在负相容效应;(2)刺激呈现方式不同相容效应也不同。这表明负相容效应的产生并不依赖于掩蔽的呈现,且刺激的呈现方式对该效应有重要影响。
中图分类号:
Boy, F., & Sumner, P. (2010). Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 892-905. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 514-520. Jas'kowski, P. (2007). The effect of nonmasking distractors on the priming of motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 456-468. Jas'kowski, P. (2008). The negative compatibility effect with nonmasking flankers: A case for mask-triggered inhibition hypothesis. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 765-777. Jas' kowski, P., & Przekoracka-Krawczyk, A. (2005). On the role of mask structure in subliminal priming. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 65, 409-417. Jas'kowski, P., Bilun' ska, A., Tomanek, M., & Verleger, R. (2008). Mask-and distractor-triggered inhibitory processes in the priming of motor responses: An EEG study. Psychophysiology, 45, 70-85. Klauer, K. C., & Dittrich, K.(2010). Frome sunshine to double arrows: An evaluation window account of negative compatibility effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(3), 490-519. Klapp, S. T., & Hinkley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269. Klauer, K. C., Teige-Mocigemba, S., & Spruyt, A. (2009). Contrast effects in spontaneous evaluations: A psychophysical account. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 96, 265-287. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 436-440. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2006). How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming. A reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 495-500. Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Sumner, P. (2007). Negative and positive masked-priming—implications for motor inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 317-326. Sumner, P., & Brandwood, T. (2008) Oscillations in motor priming: Positive rebound follows the inhibitory phase in the masked prime paradigm. J Mot Behav, 40, 484-489. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1367-1382. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 148-162. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2006). Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jas' kowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 484-494. Schlaghecken, F., Rowley, L., Sembi, S., Simmons, R., & Whitcomb, D. (2007). The negative compatibility effect: A case for self-inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 227-240. Verleger, R., Jas'kowski, P., Aydemir, A., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Groen, M. (2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and non-conscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494-515. 王一牛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉. (2008). 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22 , 608-612. |
[1] | 陈朝阳, 马兵兵, 马婷, 张锋. 亲社会视频游戏对玩家人性化知觉水平的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 561-569. |
[2] | 陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 594-600. |
[3] | 李晓彤, 王雪玲, 王大华, 燕磊. 青年子女的传统孝观念及其与早期父母教养行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 601-608. |
[4] | 刘兆敏, 张琼林. 青少年脑发育的神经法学研究与应用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 656-663. |
[5] | 侯珂, 刘艳, 屈智勇, 蒋索. 留守对农村儿童青少年社会适应的影响:倾向值匹配的比较分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 646-655. |
[6] | 陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音. 具身道德:道德心理学研究的新取向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 664-672. |
[7] | 姬旺华, 张兰鸽, 寇彧. 公正世界信念对大学生助人意愿的影响:责任归因和帮助代价的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 496-503. |
[8] | 张豹, 黄赛, 侯秋霞. 网络游戏成瘾者注意焦点转换功能的特异性损伤研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 533-539. |
[9] | 姜永志, 白晓丽. 大学生手机互联网依赖对疏离感的影响:社会支持系统的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 540-549. |
[10] | 康勇军, 王霄, 屈正良. 职业院校教师情感承诺与职业倦怠的关系:情感承诺的中介作用和职称的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 550-560. |
[11] | 李小平, 闫鸿磊, 云祥, 陈陈. 作为情境变量的移情对暴力态度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 466-473. |
[12] | 王钢, 张大均, 刘先强. 幼儿教师职业压力、心理资本和职业认同对职业幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 442-448. |
[13] | 刘有辉, 辛自强, 明朗. 考试制度信任对大学生学业投入意向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 380-386. |
[14] | 陈浩彬, 汪凤炎. 大学生智慧内隐认知的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 363-370. |
[15] | 邢学玮, 伍新春, 侯建芳, 刘畅, 陈玲玲. 父亲的角色态度对其教养投入的影响:母亲态度类型的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 387-395. |
|