心理发展与教育 ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 577-583.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉字习得的年龄效应:语音完整性假设的检验

张振军1, 丁国盛1, 陈宝国2   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京100875;
    2. 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京100875
  • 出版日期:2011-11-15 发布日期:2011-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈宝国,E-mail:chenbg@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:chenbg@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科研究基金(09YJAXLX002);应用实验心理北京市重点实验室资助

Age-of-Acquisition Effects of Chinese Character: Test of Phonological Completeness Hypothesis

ZHANG Zhen-jun1, DING Guo-sheng1, CHEN Bao-guo2   

  1. 1. State Key Lab of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2011-11-15 Published:2011-11-15

摘要: 采用语音匹配任务,考察汉字习得的年龄效应及其语音完整性假设的合理性。实验1首先采用整体语音匹配任务,证明了语音匹配实验范式的有效性。实验2和实验3分别采用声母匹配和韵母匹配任务,即事先呈现汉字的声母或者韵母,之后呈现汉字,要求被试判断呈现汉字的声母或者韵母是否与事先呈现的语音片段相同。结果发现,部分语音提取的任务中存在汉字习得的年龄效应,表现为早习得的汉字,无论声母和韵母的提取都比晚习得汉字声母和韵母的提取容易。研究结果不支持语音完整性假设,任意映射假设能够解释本研究的结果。

关键词: 汉字, 习得年龄, 语音完整性假设

Abstract: The present study investigated the age-of-acquisition effect in partially-retrieved phonological task with a phonological matching paradigm.In Experiment 1,wholly phonological matching task was used,in which the pinyin of Chinese characters were presented before characters with different age-of-acquisition,and the participants were asked to judge whether the pinyin of characters with different age-of-acquisition was the same as those presented previously.The purpose of Experiment 1 was to explore the validity of phonological matching paradigm. If age-of-acquisition effect,which had been detected in phonological naming task used by previous studies,was also found in this paradigm,then it can be said that such phonological matching paradigm was valid in investigating age-of-acquisition effect.Experiment 2 and 3 adopted consonant matching and vowel matching task respectively,in which the consonant or vowel of Chinese characters were presented before the characters with different age-of-acquisition,then the participants were asked to judge whether the consonant or vowel was the same as the phonological segments presented previously. In Experiment 1,results showed that the reaction times of early acquired Chinese characters were faster than that of late acquired ones,which was in accordance with the results in phonological naming task found in previous studies.Thus,the phonological matching paradigm used by the present study was valid and can be used to explore age-of-acquisition effect.Experiment 2 and 3 found that age-of-acquisition effect can also be detected in partially retrieved phonological task,in which no matter the consonant or vowel of early acquired Chinese characters both were retrieved much easier than that of late acquired ones. Results of the present study indicated that age-of-acquisition effect also existed in partially retrieved phonology.According to the Phonological Completeness Hypothesis,the phonology of early acquired characters was represented as a whole unit,while the phonological representations of late acquired characters were fragmented, therefore it was expected that the early acquired words will be disadvantageous in such partially retrieved phonological task compared with the late acquired characters.However,results of present study were contrary to predictions of the Phonological Completeness hypothesis,thus the present study did not support this hypothesis. While the Arbitrary Mapping Hypothesis put forward that it is the mapping relationship between input and output representations that determined the age-of-acquisition effect.The mapping from orthography to phonology in Chinese characters was relatively arbitrary,thus there should exist age-of-acquisition effect in phonological processing task and such effect may not depend upon whether the phonology was retrieved completely or partially.Therefore, results of present study can be better explained by the Arbitrary Mapping Hypothesis.

Key words: Chinese characters, Age-of-Acquisition, Phonological Completeness Hypothesis

中图分类号: 

  • B844.3
[1] Barry,C.,Morrison,C.M.,&Ellis,A.W.(1997a).Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures:Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50,560-585.
[2] Barry,C.,Johnston,R.A.,Hirsh,K.W.,&William,C.L.(1997b).An effect of name age-of-acquisition,no effect of frequency, and clear effects of repetition priming in picture naming.Manuscript submitted Publication.
[3] Belke,E.Brysbaert,M.,&Meyer,A.S.(2005).Age of acquisition effects in picture naming:Evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis.Cognition,96,B45-54.
[4] Brown,G.D.A.,&Watson,F.L.(1987).First in,first out:Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency.Memory&Cognition,15,208-216.
[5] Brysbaert,M.,&Ghyselinck,M.(2006).The effect of age of acquisition:Partly frequency related,partly frequency independent. Visual Cognition,13,992-1011.
[6] Brysbaert,M.,Wijnendaele,I.,&Deyne,S.(2000).Age-of acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks.Acta Psychologica,104,215-226.
[7] Catling,J.,&Johnston,R.,(2006).The effects of age of acquisition on an object classification task.Visual Cognition,13,968-980.
[8] Chen,B.G.,Zhou,H.X.,Dunlap,S.,&Perfetti,A.C.(2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese:Evidence in favor of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis.British Journal of Psychology,98(3),499-516.
[9] Chen,B.G.,Dent,K.,You,W.P.,&Wu,G.L.(2009).Age of acquisition affects early orthographic processing during Chinese character recognition.Acta Psychologica,130(3),196-203.
[10] Ellis,A.W.,&Morrison,C.M.,(1998).Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,24,515-523.
[11] Ellis,A.W.,&Lambon,R.M.A.(2000).Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflects loss of plasticity in maturing systems:Insights from connectionist networks.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,26,1103-1123.
[12] Fowler,A.E.(1991).How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness.In:S.A.Brady&D.P. Shankweiler(eds.),Phonological processes in literacy:A tribute to Isabelle Liberman(pp.97-117).Hillsdale,New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum.
[13] Gerhand,S.,&Barry,C.(1999).Age-of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming.Cognition,73,B27-36.
[14] Gilhooly K,J,&Gilhooly,M.(1980).The validity of age-of-acquisition rating.British Journal of Psychology,71,105-110.
[15] Jusczyk,P.W.(1993).From general to language-specific capacities:The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops.Journal of Phonetics,21,3-28.
[16] Metsala,J.L.,&Walley,A.C.(1998).Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations:Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability.In:Metsala,J.L.& Ehri,L.C.(eds.),Word recognition in beginning literacy.Mahwah,New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum.89-120.
[17] Monaghan,J.,&Ellis,A.W.(2002a).What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming?Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,28,183-206.
[18] Monaghan,J.,&Ellis,A.W.(2002b).Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representations.Reading and Writing,15,759-788.
[19] Moore,V.,&Valentine,T.(1998).Naming faces:The effect of AoA on speed and accuracy of naming famous faces.Quarterly Journal of Psychology,51(A),485-513.
[20] Morrison,C.M.,&Ellis,A.W.(1995).Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,21,116-133.
[21] Raman,I.(2006).On the age-of-acquisition effects in word naming and orthographic transparency:Mapping specific or universal?.Visual Cognition,13,1044-1053.
[22] Walley,A.C.(1993).The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review,13,286-350.
[23] You,W.P.,Chen,B.G.,&Dunlap,S.(2009).Frequency trajectory effects in Chinese character recognition:Evidence for the arbitrary mapping hypothesis.Cognition,110(1),39-50.
[24] Zevin,J.D.,&Seidenberg,M.S.(2002).Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks.Journal of Memory and Language,47,1-29.
[25] Zevin,J.D.,&Seidenberg,M.S.(2004).Age of acquisition effects in reading aloud:Test of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory.Memory&Cognition,32,31-38.
[26] 白学军,王丽红,吕勇,胡伟.(2010).词汇获得年龄效应:ERP研究.心理学探新,30,21-26.
[27] 陈宝国,尤文平,周会霞.(2007).汉语词汇习得的年龄效应:语义假设的证据.心理学报,39,9-17.
[28] 陈宝国,王立新,王璐璐,彭聃龄.(2004).词汇习得年龄和频率对词汇识别的影响.心理科学,27,1060-1064.
[29] 陈俊,林少惠,张积家.(2011).潮汕话-普通话双言者的词汇习得年龄效应.心理学报,43,111-122.
[30] 郝美玲,刘友谊,舒华,程臣曦.(2003).汉语图片命名中获得年龄的作用.心理与行为研究,1,268-273.
[1] 张忠炉, 易俊如, 张竹青, 邢强, 雷怡, 李红. 部件类型还是交错关系信息的习得促进问题解决?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[2] 古婵媛, 毕鸿燕. 主观声旁家族对汉语儿童汉字命名的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 68-75.
[3] 刘宇飞, 钱怡, 宋耀武, 毕鸿燕. 4~6岁汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 65-72.
[4] 李利平, 伍新春, 熊翠燕, 程亚华, 阮氏芳. 元语言意识和快速命名对小学生汉字听写的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 698-705.
[5] 陈钰, 李虹, 张洁, 阮晓彤, 饶夏溦, 伍新春. 书面字形在汉语低年级儿童口语词汇学习中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 616-623.
[6] 王恩国, 沈徳立, 吕勇, 胡伟, 李永鑫, 陈海霞. 语文学习困难儿童汉字记忆编码的神经机制研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 164-173.
[7] 胡天婷, 陶沙, 徐琴美, 毕鸿燕. 不同汉字解码技能与小学生阅读理解的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(2): 144-152.
[8] 王敬欣, 沈德立. 汉字的特性负启动效应与年龄发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 18(2): 9-13.
[9] 栾辉, 舒华, 张大成. 听写任务下儿童汉字输出特点及影响因素的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(1): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!