让小我融入大我:适恰自尊的积极心理学意义

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.04.13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究基于本土自尊理论，将建立在适度恰当满足大小我需要基础上的自尊称为“适恰自尊”，并从个体，人际与集体三个层面揭示其积极心理学意义。结果发现：（1）在个体层面，适恰自尊与青少年主观幸福感显著正相关；（2）在人际层面，适恰自尊会放大来自他人（即父母）适恰自尊对青少年主观幸福感的积极影响；（3）在集体层面，大学新生的适恰自尊与大我自尊显著正相关，并有利于大学新生在入学一年内通过逐步建立大我自尊和小我自尊满足多重基本心理需要。本研究通过揭示中国人理想型自尊的内涵和机制，将会助力中国人理性平和，积极向上社会心态的建立与提升。

关键词: 身份调和器理论, 适恰自尊, 中庸, 大我, 小我

Abstract: Identity modulation theory suggests that self-esteem is a function of finding harmony between the two competing values of uniqueness and similarity. We refer to the form of self-esteem that is built on balance between uniqueness and similarity as syncretic self-esteem. As a "just-right" expression of self-esteem, syncretic self-esteem is proposed to facilitate individuals' intrapersonal, interpersonal, and collective well-being. The results of two studies support our hypothesis:(1) Syncretic self-esteem was positively correlated with adolescents' subjective well-being, and it can boost the positive effects of parents' syncretic self-esteem on adolescents' subjective well-being; (2) Syncretic self-esteem predicted university freshmen's basic needs satisfaction through collective self-esteem and personal self-esteem in a longitudinal study. Overall, the present research on syncretic self-esteem has important theoretical and practical implications for understanding self-esteem among Chinese individuals and finding ways to promote their well-being.

Key words: identity modulation theory, syncretic self-esteem, zhongyong, large-ego, small-ego

中图分类号:

B844

王轶楠, 刘嘉. 让小我融入大我:适恰自尊的积极心理学意义[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 568-575.

WANG Yinan, LIU Jia. The Fusion of Small-ego and Large-ego: The Positive Implications of Syncretic Self-esteem[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(4): 568-575.

参考文献

Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 60-67.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy:The basis for true self-esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-49). New York:Plenum.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?. Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.
James, W. (Ed.).(1890). The principles of psychology. New York:Henry Holt.
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor:The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518-530.
Luhtanen, R. K., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale:Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302-318.
Marshall, S. L., Parker, P. D., Ciarrochi, J., & Heaven, P. C. (2014). Is self-esteem a cause or consequence of social support? A 4-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 85(3), 1275-1291.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought:Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). The measurement of self-esteem. In M. Rosenberg (Ed.), Society and the adolescent self image (pp. 297-307). New York, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Sch ne, C., Tandler, S. S., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2015). Contingent self-esteem and vulnerability to depression:Academic contingent self-esteem predicts depressive symptoms in students. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(10), 1573.
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being:The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482-497.
Sheldon, K. M., & Hilpert, J. C. (2012). The balanced measure of psychological needs (BMPN) scale:An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 439-451.
Wang, Y., Chang, E., Xu, J. & Liu, J. (2020). Finding "just-right" self-esteem:Syncretic self-esteem promotes intrapersonal and interpersonal well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.http://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3ntu8
Wang, Y., Kong, F., Huang, L., & Liu, J. (2016). Neural correlates of biased responses:The negative method effect in the Rosenberg self-esteem scale is associated with right amygdala volume. Journal of Personality, 84(5), 623-632.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Wouters, S., Duriez, B., Luyckx, K., Klimstra, T., Colpin, H., Soenens, B., & Verschueren, K. (2013). Depressive symptoms in university freshmen:Longitudinal relations with contingent self-esteem and level of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 356-363.
蔡锦昌. (2000). 二元与二气之间:分类与思考方式的比较. 报告于"社会科学概念:本土与西方"讨论会, 中国:台北.
费孝通. (1985). 乡土中国. 上海:三联书店.
黄四林, 韩明跃, 宁彩芳, 林崇德. (2016). 大学生学校认同对责任感的影响:自尊的中介作用. 心理学报,48(6),684-692.
黄希庭, 尹天子. (2012). 从自尊的文化差异说起. 心理科学, 35(7), 2-8.
侯玉波, 彭凯平, 朱滢. (2016). 中国人整体思维方式量表的编制与确认. 中国社会心理学评论, 11(2), 45-72.
王沛, 陈庆伟, 唐晓晨, 罗俊龙, 谈晨皓, 高凡. (2017). 中国人三重自我建构加工中的相对优先性:来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 49(8), 1072-1079.
王轶楠. (2005). 有关自我增强跨文化普遍性的争论. 心理科学进展, 13(6), 822-827.
王轶楠. (2010). 中庸视角下的自我研究探析. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 55(4), 51-57.
王轶楠. (2016). 自尊的神经生理基础. 心理科学进展, 24(9), 1422-1426.
王轶楠. (2020). 身份调和器理论:一个新的本土化自尊理论的提出. 心理技术与应用, 8(3), 185-192.
杨中芳. (1991). 试论中国人的 "自己":理论与研究方向. 见高尚仁, 杨中芳(编), 中国人, 中国心——社会与人格篇 (pp. 93-145). 中国台北:远流出版公司.
杨中芳, 林升栋. (2012). 中庸实践思维体系构念图的建构效度研究. 社会学研究, 27(4), 167-186.
张德胜, 金耀基, 陈海文, 陈健民, 杨中芳, 赵志裕, 伊沙白. (2001). 论中庸理性:工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外. 社会学研究,16(2), 33-48.
张力为, 梁展鹏. (2002). 运动员的生活满意感:个人自尊与集体自尊的贡献. 心理学报, 34(2), 51-58.
周浩,龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
朱滢, 张力. (2001). 自我记忆效应的实验研究. 中国科学, 31(6), 537-543.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed