心理发展与教育 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 410-416.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.04.04
向玲, 范淑娴, 陈家利, 王宝玺
XIANG Ling, FAN Shuxian, CHEN Jiali, WANG Baoxi
摘要: 本研究基于双重认知控制理论,通过比较学困组和对照组在持续性操作任务上的表现来探究学习困难青少年的认知控制特点。结果发现:(1)在反应性控制的指标上,学困组和对照组的反应时和正确率不存在显著差异,但学困组对探测刺激的辨别力指数更低,显示学困组的反应性控制能力存在一定不足;(2)在主动性控制的指标上,学困组的反应时更长、正确率更低,且对线索刺激的辨别力指数更低,显示学困组在对线索刺激保持的各项指标上都比对照组更差,说明学困组在主动性控制上的缺陷更为明显。
中图分类号:
B844
Barkley, R. A., Edwards, G., Laneri, M., Fletcher, K., & Metevia, L. (2001). Executive functioning, temporal discounting, and sense of time in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (adhd) and oppositional defiant disorder (odd). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29(6), 541-556Braver, T. S., Satpute, A. B., Rush, B. K., Racine, C. A., & Barch, D. M. (2005). Context processing and context maintenance in healthy aging and early stage dementia of the alzheimer's type. Psychology & Aging, 20(1), 33-46.Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007).Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation:Dual mechanism of cognitive control. In Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76-106). New York:Oxford University.Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control:a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106-113.Censabella, S., & Noël, M. P. (2005). The inhibition of exogenous distracting information in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(5), 400-410.Chatham, C.H., Frank, M.J., & Munakata, Y. (2009). Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(14), 5529-5533Cragg, L., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., Roome, H. E., & Gilmore, C. (2017). Direct and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievement. Cognition, 162, 12-26.Czernochowski, D., Nessler, D., & Friedman, D. (2010). On why not to rush older adults-relying on reactive cognitive control can effectively reduce errors at the expense of slowed responses. Psychophysiology, 47(4), 637-646.Iselin, A. M. R., & Decoster, J. (2009). Reactive and proactive control in incarcerated and community adolescents and young adults. Cognitive Development, 24(2), 192-206.Gupta, P., & Sharma, V. (2017). Working memory and learning disabilities:a review. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4), 111-121.Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say:a critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 239-256.Kirk, S. A., & Bateman, B. (1962). Diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 29(2), 73-78.Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A., & Ganley, C. M. (2017). Foundations of mathematics and literacy:the role of executive functioning components. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153, 15-34.Redick, T. S. (2014). Cognitive control in context:working memory capacity and proactive control. Acta Psychologica, 145(1), 1-9.Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2011). Integrating working memory capacity and context-processing views of cognitive control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(6), 1048-1055.Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M.,Segalowitz, S. J., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control:The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 129-140.Robinson, L. J., Thompson, J. M., Gallagher, P., Gray, J. M., Young, A. H., & Ferrier, I. N. (2013). Performance monitoring and executive control of attention in euthymic bipolar disorder:employing the cpt-ax paradigm.Psychiatry Research, 210(2), 457-64.Sluis, S. V. D., Jong, P. F. D., & Leij, A. V. D. (2004). Inhibition and shifting in children with learning deficits in arithmetic and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(3), 239-266.Thomas, R. M., Kaipa, R., & Ganesh, A. C. (2015). Auditory interference control in children with learning disability:an exploratory study. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79(12), 2079-2085.蒋军, 陈安涛, 张蔚蔚, 张庆林. (2012). 无意识信息引发的认知控制及其神经机制. 心理科学进展, 20(10), 1573-1584.王恩国, 刘昌. (2007). 初中二年级学习困难学生的中央执行功能. 中国心理卫生杂志, 21(10), 661-665.王利平. (2007). 学习困难学生执行功能研究(硕士学位论文).河北大学,保定.徐雷, 唐丹丹, 陈安涛. (2012). 主动性和反应性认知控制的权衡机制及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 20(7), 1012-1022.张妍, 刘爱书, 张修竹 于增艳.(2011). 不同亚型学习障碍儿童的执行功能特点. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(6), 769-772.周步成.(1991).学习适应性测验. 华东师范大学,上海.周世杰, 杨娟, 张拉艳, 蔡太生. (2006). 学习障碍儿童的工作记忆研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 14(2), 129-131. |
[1] | 王琦, 俞国良. 刻板印象威胁对学习困难中学生成就动机的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 425-432. |
[2] | 田丽丽, 周欣, 康丹, 徐晶晶, 李正清. 5~6岁不同数学能力水平儿童的执行功能差异研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 9-16. |
[3] | 王恩国, 沈徳立, 吕勇, 胡伟, 李永鑫, 陈海霞. 语文学习困难儿童汉字记忆编码的神经机制研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 164-173. |
[4] | 王恩国, 刘昌. 语文学习困难儿童的工作记忆与加工速度[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 94-100. |
[5] | 李伟健. 学习困难学生排除理解障碍的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(3): 81-85. |
[6] | 刘岩, 张明, 徐国庆. 学习困难和优秀学生延迟满足能力的跨情境比较实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 17(3): 63-67. |
[7] | 张明, 刘岩. 学习困难学生问题行为及其影响因素的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 74-78. |
[8] | 李晓东, 聂尤彦, 林崇德. 初中二年级学生学习困难、人际关系、自我接纳对心理健康的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 68-73. |
[9] | 陈学锋, 谢天壬. 5-10岁儿童发展性学习困难的教育干预研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(2): 13-18. |
[10] | 杨锦平, 金惠国, 黄财兴. 学习困难初中生注意特性发展及影响因素研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1995, 11(2): 54-59. |
[11] | 张舒哲. 论学习困难的界定方法和基本类型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1994, 10(2): 59-64. |
[12] | 杨心德. 中小学学习困难学生焦虑的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1994, 10(2): 55-58. |
[13] | 季军, 王玉凤, 顾伯美, 刘靖. 多动症和学习困难儿童父母教育方式探讨[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1994, 10(1): 52-57. |
|