数量空间表征的特点:跨视听通道下的SNARC效应

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.02.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从跨通道的角度入手，采用大小比较任务，对视听单通道及跨通道下数量空间表征的特点及表征过程中的相互影响进行探讨。结果发现，视觉通道和听觉通道均存在SNARC效应；在跨通道任务下，无论启动通道是视觉还是听觉通道，都表现出，当启动通道的数量大小信息与主通道的数量大小一致或无关时，主通道的SNARC效应没有显著变化；但当启动通道的数量大小信息与主通道不一致时，主通道的SNARC效应受到显著影响，表现为降低或消失。这进一步证明了SNARC效应受情境影响的特点，并发现在进行跨通道数量空间表征时，听觉通道的数量信息对视觉通道下的数量空间表征的影响大于视觉通道的数量信息对听觉通道下的数量空间表征的影响。

关键词: 数量空间表征, SNARC效应, 跨通道

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted in the present study to examine the features of the spatial representation of magnitude through visual,auditory,and cross-modal perception.Numerical comparison tasks were adapted from a cross-modal perspective.Results in Experiment 1 revealed that SNARC effect was presented through either visual or auditory channel.For the cross-modal perception in Experiment 2,when the magnitude of number in the priming channel was consistent or irrelevant with that in the main channel,the SNARC effect was found to be similar to Experiment 1,whether the priming channel was a visual or auditory one.However,when the magnitude of number in the priming channel was inconsistent with that in the main channel,the SNARC effect of the main channel was found to be significantly reduced or even disappear.These results provided further evidence that SNARC effect would be affected by situations.In addition,this study also found that for the spatial representation of magnitude under cross-modal perception,numerical information from the auditory channel might have a greater influence on the spatial representation of magnitude in the visual channel rather than vice versa.

Key words: the spatial representation of magnitude, SNARC effect, cross-modality

中图分类号:

B844

赵琪, 李龙凤, 邓之君, 陈英和. 数量空间表征的特点:跨视听通道下的SNARC效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 129-138.

ZHAO Qi, LI Longfeng, DENG Zhijun, CHEN Yinghe. Characteristics of the Spatial Representation of Magnitude:SNARC Effect across Audiovisual Channels[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(2): 129-138.

参考文献

Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 122(3), 371-396.

Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626-641.

Durk, T., Daniel S., Salvador S. & Marty G. W. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (9), 400-410.

Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing:Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 95-110.

Fischer M. H. (2006). The future for SNARC could be stark…. Cortex, 42(8), 1066-1068.

Fischer, M.H., Mills, R.A., & Shaki, S. (2010). How to cook a SNARC:Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain and Cognition, 72(3), 333-336.

Fischer M. H., Riello M., Giordano B. L., Rusconi E. (2013). Singing numbers … in cognitive space. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 354-366.

Golob EJ, Lewald J, Jungilligens J, Getzmann S. (2016). Interaction of number magnitude and auditory localization. Perception, 45(1-2), 165-179.

Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall:Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(4), 736-749.

Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. S., & Chun, M. M.(2005). Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(45), 16524-16529.

Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., Karnas, D., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli:A piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1189-1207.

Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J.M., Pratt, J., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Coding strategies in number space:Memory requirements influence spatial-numerical associations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 515-524.

Murray, M. M., Michel, C. M., Grave de Peralta, R., Ortigue, S., Brunet, D., Gonzalez, A. S., & Schnider, A. (2004). Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 21(1), 125-135.

Nuerk, H. C., Wood, G., & Willmes, K. (2005). The universal SNARC effect:The association between number magnitude and space is amodal.. Experimental Psychology, 52(3), 187-194.

Pfister, R., Schroeder, P. A., & Kunde, W. (2013). SNARC struggles:Instant control over spatial-numerical associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1953-1958.

Previtali P., de Hevia M. D., Girelli L. (2010). Placing order in space:the SNARC effect in serial learning. Experimental Brain Research, 201(3), 599-605.

Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & G bel, S. M. (2012). Direction counts:A comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(2), 275-281.

Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 896-918.

Stein, B.E., & Stanford, T. R. (2008). Mutisensory integration, current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 9(4), 255-266.

Szucs, D., & Csepe, V. (2004). Access to numerical information is dependent on the modality of stimulus presentation in mental addition:A combined ERP and behavioral study. Brain research. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(1), 10-27.

Viarouge, A., Hubbard, E. M., & Dehaene, S. (2014). The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1484-1499.

Viarouge, A., Hubbard, E. M., & McCandliss, B. D. (2014). The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect:An individual differences approach. PLoS One, 9(4), e95756.

Vuilleumier, P., Ortigue, S., & Brugger, P. (2004). The number space and neglect. Cortex, 40(2), 399-410.

Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.C., & Fischer, M.H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number:A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 489-525.

陈英和. (2015). 儿童数量表征与数概念的发展特点及机制. 心理发展与教育,31(1),21-28.

陈英和,赖颖慧. (2013). 儿童非符号数量表征的特点及作用探析. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1(1),33-41.

胡耿丹,金志成. (2009). 工作记忆负载对位置干扰子激活加工和抑制加工的影响. 心理学报,41(4),292-304.

金桂春,王强强,王有智,吴彦文. (2016). 数字SNARC效应大小和顺序信息的分离. 心理与行为研究,14(2),228-233.

孔风,赵晶晶,游旭群,张宇. (2012). 听觉通道下负数的低水平加工引起注意的SNARC效应. 心理与行为研究,10(1),12-17.

潘运,白学军,沈德立,赵守盈. (2012). 内源性注意和外源性注意对中小学生SNARC效应的影响. 心理发展与教育,28(6),561-568.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 吕潇潇, 张巧, 李海娇. 儿童理解监控的即时加工过程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 592-599.
[2]	曹碧华, 黄小梅, 杨丽, 李红, 李富洪. 亮度对空间-数字反应编码联合效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 394-400.
[3]	潘运, 白学军, 沈德立, 赵守盈. 内源性注意和外源性注意对中小学生SNARC效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 561-568.