线索强度对测试效应的调节:时间间隔上的差异

心理发展与教育 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 609-615.

线索强度对测试效应的调节:时间间隔上的差异

郑俊, 张玮, 罗良

北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京 100875

出版日期:2014-11-15 发布日期:2014-11-15
通讯作者: 罗良,E-mail:luoliang@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:luoliang@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(31100817, 31000506);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJCXLX032).

Cue Strength Regulating the Testing Effect:The Differences between Different Testing Intervals

ZHENG Jun, ZHANG Wei, LUO Liang

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Online:2014-11-15 Published:2014-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用不同线索强度(强/弱)的中文词对, 选取大学生被试126人, 考察了不同学习方式(重学/测试)在不同时间间隔(5分钟/2天)最终自由回忆测试成绩上的差异。结果发现:在强线索强度词对上, 学习方式主效应显著, 测试条件的回忆成绩在5分钟以及2天后均高于重学条件;而在弱线索强度词对上, 学习方式与间隔时间交互作用显著, 5分钟时重学条件与测试条件的记忆成绩差异不显著, 而2天后测试条件的记忆成绩却显著高于重学条件。结果表明词对的线索强度能够调节测试对不同时间间隔记忆保持的促进作用, 支持了精细提取假设。

关键词: 线索强度, 测试效应, 长时记忆, 精细提取假设, 概念组织

Abstract: The testing effect refers to the fact that in comparsion to restudy, involvment in the testing enhances long-term retention. The current study had 126 subjects, and adopted Chinese words pairs with different cue strength (strong/weak) as experimental materials. The experiment was designed to explore how learning methods (restudy/testing) influencing the memory retention on different testing intervals (5 minutes/2 days). The results indicated that:(1) memory of target words with strong cues showed the main effect of learning methods:the target performance in testing group was higher than restudy group. (2) In the situation of weak cues, the main effect of learning methods wasn't significant, but there was an interaction between learning methods and testing intervals:there was no significant difference between the immediate recall of restudy and testing group, however, the performance of testing group was significant higher than restudy group two days later. In conclusion, these results demonstrated that cue strength regulating the testing effect, which supports the elaborative retrieval hypothesis

Key words: cue strength, testing effect, long-term memory, elaborative retrieval hypothesis, conceptual organization

中图分类号:

G442

郑俊, 张玮, 罗良. 线索强度对测试效应的调节:时间间隔上的差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 609-615.

ZHENG Jun, ZHANG Wei, LUO Liang. Cue Strength Regulating the Testing Effect:The Differences between Different Testing Intervals[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(6): 609-615.

参考文献

Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the testing effect with open-and closed-book tests.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 861-876.
Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier:An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena Vol. In R. L. Solso (Ed.).Information processing and cognition:The Loyola symposium(pp. 123-144).
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 13(4), 273-281.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH:Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles.PLoS One, 5(6), e10729.
Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect:The benefits of elaborative retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1563-1569.
Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention:Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1547-1552.
Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention:Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 268-276.
Congleton, A. R., & Rajaram, S. (2011). The influence of learning methods on collaboration:Prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 140(4), 535-551.
Congleton, A. R., & Rajaram, S. (2012). The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect:The roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization.Memory & Cognition, 40(4), 528-539.
Devlin, J. T., Matthews, P. M., & Rushworth, M. F. (2003). Semantic processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex:a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 71-84.
Glover, J. A. (1989). The" testing" phenomenon:Not gone but nearly forgotten.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 392-399.
Kang, S. H. (2010). Enhancing visuospatial learning:The benefit of retrieval practice.Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1009-1017.
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping.science, 331(6018), 772-775.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning.science, 319(5865), 966-968
Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting:A distribution-based bifurcation model.Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 85-97.
Martin, R. C., & Cheng, Y. (2006). Selection demands versus association strength in the verb generation task.Psychonomic bulletin & review, 13(3), 396-401.
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice.Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1917-1927.
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis:Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory?Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 437-447.
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory:Mediator effectiveness hypothesis.science, 330(6002), 335.
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.Trends in cognitive sciences, 15(1), 20-27.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning:taking memory tests improves long-term retention.Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.
van den Broek, G. S. E., Takashima, A., Segers, E., Fernandez, G., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Neural correlates of testing effects in vocabulary learning.NeuroImage, 78, 94-102.
Wheeler, M., Ewers, M., & Buonanno, J. (2003). Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.Memory, 11(6), 571-580.
Wing, E. A., Marsh, E. J., & Cabeza, R. (2013). Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement:an fMRI study of the testing effect.Neuropsychologia, 51(12), 2360-2370.
刘兆敏, 罗良,张玮. (2011). 记忆提取促进学习:实验证据与机制解释.心理发展与教育, 27(4), 441-447.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	刘岩, 张宏飞, 卢鑫, 曲可佳. 数学概率问题解决学习中的测试效应及有效促进[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 215-223.
[2]	李永芬, 唐丹丹, 曹碧华, 梁秀玲, 李红. 大学生第二外语词汇学习中的测试效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 198-204.
[3]	刘兆敏, 罗良, 张玮. 记忆提取促进学习:实验证据与机制解释[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(4): 441-447.