大学生心理控制源与内疚感和羞耻感对反事实思维的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究以128名大学生为研究对象,采用2 (心理控制源: 外控型、内控型)×2 (自我道德感: 内疚感、羞耻感) 两因素被试间实验设计,考察了外控和内控大学生在内疚感和羞耻感两种不同的自我道德情感下反事实思维内容的差异。结果表明:(1) 心理控制源对大学生反事实思维不同内容的诱发具有重要的影响:外控者更倾向于产生行为和情境导向的反事实思维,而内控者更倾向于产生自我导向的反事实思维。内疚感和羞耻感对大学生反事实思维内容的产生没有直接的影响;(2) 反事实思维内容的产生受到了心理控制源与内疚感和羞耻感两种自我道德情感的交互影响:外控者在羞耻感的启动条件下比在内疚感的启动条件下表现出了更多的行为和情境导向的反事实思维,而内控者在内疚感的启动条件下比在羞耻感的条件下表现出了更多的自我导向的反事实思维。研究结果有助于解释以中西方不同被试而得出的内疚感和羞耻感与反事实思维关系的矛盾结论。

关键词: 心理控制源, 反事实思维, 内疚感, 羞耻感

Abstract: The present study aimed to investigate the role of locus of control and self-oriented moral emotions (guilt and shame) in inducing the counterfactual thinking. 128 college students were first divided into two groups of high and low locus of control based on their scores on an Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (IE), they were then randomly assigned to conditions in which they were primed with either guilt or shame. After the guilt and shame priming procedure, participants were induced to generate counterfactual thinking. In this study a 2 (Locus of Control: external control and internal control) ×2 (Self-Moral Emotion: guilt and shame) experimental design were adopted. The results indicated that: (1) Locus of control had significantly effect on counterfactual thinking, external control participants generated more action and situational-oriented counterfactual thinking, but internal control participant generated more self-oriented counterfactual thinking. But guilt and shame had no significant effect on counterfactual thinking. (2) The generation of counterfactual thinking was influenced jointly by locus of control and self-oriented moral emotions (guilt and shame): For participants of external control, there were more likely to an action and situation-oriented counterfactual thinking in shame emotion than in guilt emotion, but for participants of internal control, there were more likely to a self-oriented counterfactual thinking in guilt emotion than in shame emotion. The results can also explain the contradiction thinking of relationship between guilt and shame and counterfactual thinking of previous studies based on different participants.

Key words: locus of control, counterfactual thinking, guilt, shame

中图分类号:

B844.3

高学德. 大学生心理控制源与内疚感和羞耻感对反事实思维的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(2): 159-165.

GAO Xue-de. The Effects of Locus of Control and Guilt and Shame on Counterfactual Thinking[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(2): 159-165.

参考文献

Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19-30.
Dougherty, D. D., Rauch, S. L., Deckersbacn, T., Marci, C. D., Loh, R., Shin, L. M., et al. (2004).Ventromedial prefrontal cortex and amygdala dysfunction during an anger induction positron emission tomography study in patients with major depressive disorder with anger attacks. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 795-804.
Gavanski, I., & Wells, G. L. (1989). Counterfactual processing of normal and exceptional events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 314-325.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
Hong, Y., Chao, M., Yang, Y., & Rosner, J. L. (2010). Building and testing theories: Experiences from conducting social identity research. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 22-36.
Kahneman, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
Kross, E., Davison, M., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. (2009). Coping with emotions past: The neural bases of regulating affect associated with negative autobiographical memories. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 361-366.
Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-526.
Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York: International Universities Press.
Lutwak, N., Panish, J., & Ferrari, J. (2003). Shame and guilt:Characterological vs. behavioral self-blame and their relationship to fear of intimacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 909-916.
Mandel, D. R., & Mandeep, K. D. (2005). “What I did” versus “What I might have done” effect of factual versus counterfactual thinking on blame, guilt, and shame in prisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1-9.
Mattew, T. C., & Sean, M. M. (2004). When mutations meet motivations: Attitude biases in counterfactual thought. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 65-74.
Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (1992). When timing matters: The influence of temporal distance on consumers' affective and persuasive responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 424-433.
N'gbala, A., & Branseombe, N. R. (1995). Mental simulation and causal attribution when simulating an event does not affect fault assignment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 139-162.
Niedenthal, P. M., Tangney, J. P., & Gavanski, L. (1994). “If only weren't” versus “If only I hadn't”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 585-595.
Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement. A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45, 489-493.
Sanna, L. J. (1998). Defensive pessimism and optimism: The bitter-sweet influence of mood on performance and prefactual and counterfactual thinking. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 635-665.
Tangney, J. P. (1995). Recent advances in the empirical study of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientists, 38, 1132-1145.
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2006). Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: Support for a theoretical model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1339-1351.
Wong, E. M. (2010). Research article it could have been better: The effects of counterfactual communication on impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1251-1260.
Wong, E. M., Haselhuhn, M. P., & Kray, L. J. (2012). Improving the future by considering the past: The impact of upward counterfactual reflection and implicit beliefs on negotiation performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 403-406.
Zeelenberg, M., Wilco, W., Joop, P., Antony, S. R., Manstead, P., & Reinderman, D. (1998). Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Processes, 75, 117-141.
邦德主编. (1990). 中国人的心理 (张世富等译). 昆明: 云南人民出版社, 204.
陈俊, 贺晓玲, 张积家. (2007). 反事实思维两大理论: 范例说和目标-指向说. 心理科学进展, 15, 416-422.
樊召锋, 俞国良. (2008). 自尊、归因方式与内疚和羞耻的关系研究. 心理学探新, 28, 57-61.
冯淑丹, 杨艺馨. (2012). 青少年羞耻感与心理控制源、自我效能感的关系研究. 山西青年管理干部学院学报, 25, 15-18.
高学德, 周爱保, 宿光平. (2008). 反事实思维与内疚和羞耻的关系—以大学生和青少年罪犯为例. 心理发展与教育, 4, 113-118.
汪向东. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册. 增订版. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志出版社, 330-332.
谢波, 钱铭怡. (2000). 中国大学生羞耻和内疚的现象学差异. 心理学报, 32, 105-109.
杨国枢, 黄光国, 杨中芳. (2005). 华人本土心理学, 台北: 远流出版集团股份有限公司, 365-405.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王玉龙, 陈慧玲, 覃雅兰, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤行为的自我惩罚功能:源于内疚感还是羞耻感？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 219-226.
[2]	李永占. 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
[3]	衡书鹏, 周宗奎, 孙丽君, 李俊一. 游戏暴力合理性对攻击性的影响:一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 49-57.
[4]	高学德, 周爱保, 宿光平. 反事实思维与内疚和羞耻的关系——以大学生和青少年罪犯为例[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(4): 113-118.
[5]	张坤. 幼儿反事实推理的错误源分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(1): 6-9.
[6]	蓝劲松. 大学生的心理控制源和应付方式对其自我认可的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1995, 11(3): 21-23,36.