内源性注意和外源性注意对中小学生SNARC效应的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用内源性注意和外源性注意实验范式,以判断数字奇偶为任务,材料为1～9的阿拉伯数字,考察内源性和外源性线索不同注意条件下中小学生的数字加工SNARC效应。结果发现:(1)内源性线索和外源性线索条件下,中小学生在数字加工任务中所表现出来的SNARC效应随着年龄增长逐渐增大;(2)内源性线索和外源性线索注意条件下,各年级学生均表现出显著的SNARC效应;(3)内源性线索非注意条件下,中学生能够表现出显著的SNARC效应,但小学生的SNARC效应不明显;外源性线索非注意条件下,高中生能够表现出显著的SNARC效应,但小学生和初中生的SNARC效应不明显,说明外源性注意对中小学生数字加工SNARC效应的影响比内源性注意大,且对SNARC效应的影响主要表现在较大的数字8和9上。

关键词: 内源性注意, 外源性注意, SNARC效应, 数字加工, 中小学生

Abstract: In present study,endogenous and exogenous experimental paradigms were used to investigate primary and middle school students'SNARC effect of number processing in attended or unattended conditions.The stimuli were numbers(1～9)in Arabic.Subjects'task was to decide whether the presented number was odd or even.The results showed that:(1)in the endogenous and exogenous cues,the development of the SNARC effect increased with age from primary school to senior high school under the task of number processing.(2)in attended conditions of endogenous and exogenous cues,there were significant SNARC effects from primary school to senior high school students.(3)in unattended condition of endogenous cue,there were significant SNARC effects in middle school students,but not in primary school students;in unattended condition of exogenous cue,there was significant SNARC effect in senior high school students,but not in primary and junior high school students.Moreover,the influence of unattended condition on SNARC effect was mainly found in the large numbers(8,9).

Key words: endogenous attention, exogenous attention, SNARC effect, number processing, primary and middle school students

中图分类号:

B844.1

潘运, 白学军, 沈德立, 赵守盈. 内源性注意和外源性注意对中小学生SNARC效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 561-568.

PAN Yun, BAI Xue-jun, SHEN De-li, ZHAO Shou-ying. Endogenous and Exogenous Attention Affected Primary and Middle School Students’ SNARC Effect[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(6): 561-568.

参考文献

[1] Berch,D.B.,Foley,E.J.,Hill,R.J.,&Ryan,P.M.(1999).Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals:Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,74(4),286-308.
[2] Berger,A.,Henik,A.,&Rafal,R.(2005).Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,134(2),207-221.
[3] Casarotti,M.,Michielin,M.,Zorzi,M.,&Umiltà,C.(2007).Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention.Cognition,102(1),101-117.
[4] Davidson,M.C.,Amso,D.,Anderson,L.C.,&Diamond,A. (2006).Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years:Evidence from manipulations of memory,inhibition,and task switching.Neuropsychologia,44(11),2037-2078.
[5] Dehaene,S.,Bossini,S.,&Giraux,P.(1993).The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experiment Psychology:General,122(3),371-396.
[6] Doallo,S.,Lorenzo-López,L.,Vizoso,C.,Rodríguez Holguín,S.,Amenedo,E.,Bará,S.,et al.(2004).The time course of the effects of central and peripheral cues on visual processing:an event-related potentials study.Clinical Neurophysiology,115(1),119-210.
[7] Doallo,S.,Lorenzo-López,L.,Vizoso,C.,Rodríguez Holguín,S.,Amenedo,E.,Bará,S.,et al.(2005).Modulations of the visual N1 component of event-related potentials by central and peripheral cueing.Clinical Neurophysiology,116(4),807-820.
[8] Fias,W.,&Fischer,M,H.(2005).Spatial Representation of Numbers.In J.I.D.Campbell(Ed.),Handbook of Mathematical Cognition.New York:Psychology Press.
[9] Fischer,M.H.,Castel,A.D.,Dodd,M.D.,&Pratt,J.(2003).Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention.Nature Neuroscience,66(6),555-556.
[10] Fueyo,V.,&Bushell,D.(1998).Using number line procedures and peer tutoring to improving the mathematics computation of low-performing first grades.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,31(3),417-430.
[11] Imbo,I.,De Brauwer,J.,Fias,W.,&Gevers,W.(2012).The development of the SNARC-effect:Evidence for early verbal coding.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,111(4),671-680.
[12] Jonides,J.(1981).Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement.In J.B.Long&A.D.Baddeley(Eds.),Attention and performance(Vol.9,pp.187-203).Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
[13] Kaufman,E.L.,Lord,M.W.,Reese,T.,&Volkmann,J. (1949).The discrimination of visual number.American Journal of Psychology,62,498-525.
[14] Müller,H.J.,&Findlay,J.M.(1988).The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element display.Acta Psychologica,69:129-155.
[15] Pinel,P.,Dehaene,S.,Riviere,D.,&LeBihan,D.(2001).Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task.Neuroimage,14(5),1013-1026.
[16] Posner,M.I.(1980).Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32(2),3-25.
[17] Rosen,A.C.,Rao,S.M.,Caffarra,P.,Scaglioni,A.,Bobholz,J.A.,Woodley,S.J.,et al.(1999).Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting:A functional MRI study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11(2),135-152.
[18] Spence,C.J.,&Driver,J.(1994).Cover spatial orienting in audition exogenous and endogenous mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,20(3),555-574.
[19] Szuūcs,D.,Soltész,F.,Jármi,.(2007).The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children:an electro-encephalography study.Behavioral and Brain Function,30(1),3-23.
[20] Theeuwes,J.(1991).Exogenous and endogenous control of attention the effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception&Psychophysic,49 (1),83-90.
[21] Trick,L.M.,&Pylyshyn,Z.W.(1994).Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently a limited capacity preattentive stage in vision.Psychological Review,101(1),80-102.
[22] van Galen,M.S.,&Reitsma,P.(2008).Developing access to number magnitude:A study of the SNARC effect in 7-to 9-year-olds.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,101(2),99-113.
[23] Wood,G.,Willmes,K.,Nuerk,H.C.,&Fischer,M.H.(2008).On the cognitive link between space and number:a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect.Psychology Science Quarterly,50(4),489-525.
[24] 刘超,买晓琴,傅小兰.(2004).不同注意条件下的空间—数字反应编码联合反应.心理学报,36(6),671-680.
[25] 刘超,买晓琴,傅小兰.(2005).内源性注意与外源性注意条件对数字加工的不同影响.心理学报,37(2),167-177.
[26] 潘运,白学军,沈德立.(2010a).内源性注意和外源性注意条件下SOA变化对数字距离效应的影响.心理科学,33(3),521-524.
[27] 潘运,白学军,沈德立.(2010b).内源性注意和外源性注意条件下SOA变化对SNARC效应的影响.西南大学学报(自然科学版),32(10),165-170.
[28] 潘运,白学军,沈德立.(2011).内源性注意和外源性注意条件下线索提示有效性对数字距离效应的影响.西南大学学报(自然科学版),33(8),167-172.
[29] 吴燕,隋光远,曹晓华.(2007).内源性注意和外源性注意的ERP研究.心理科学进展,15(1),71-77.

相关文章 15

[1]	张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[2]	汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康：情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[3]	曹碧华, 黄小梅, 杨丽, 李红, 李富洪. 亮度对空间-数字反应编码联合效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 394-400.
[4]	赵琪, 李龙凤, 邓之君, 陈英和. 数量空间表征的特点:跨视听通道下的SNARC效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 129-138.
[5]	王玥, 赵丽娟, 许志星. 课业负担对学校生活满意度的影响:学校氛围的多水平调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 205-213.
[6]	陈晓惠, 石文典. 中小学生学业自我概念与学业成绩的交叉滞后分析:符合交互影响模型,还是发展观?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 81-88.
[7]	马虹, 姚梅林, 吉雪岩. 家长投入对中小学生学业投入的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 710-718.
[8]	林崇德, 伍新春, 张宇迪, 臧伟伟, 周宵, 戴艳. 汶川地震30个月后中小学生的身心状况研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 631-640.
[9]	伍新春, 张宇迪, 林崇德, 臧伟伟. 中小学生的灾难暴露程度对创伤后应激障碍的影响：中介和调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 641-648.
[10]	陈斌斌, 李丹. 学生感知的班级人际和谐及其与社会行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(2): 41-46.
[11]	李晔, 刘华山. 中小学生对教师的信任及问卷编制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 88-94.
[12]	邹泓, 屈智勇, 叶苑. 中小学生的师生关系与其学校适应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 77-82.
[13]	张树东, 董奇. 一～四年级小学生发展性计算障碍的亚类型研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 76-81.
[14]	杨阿丽, 方晓义, 李辉, 蔺秀云, 刘倩倩. 云南省中小学生师生关系发展特点及对学校适应的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 49-56.
[15]	蔡笑岳, 朱雨洁. 中小学生创造性倾向、智力及学业成绩的相关研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 36-41.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed