心理发展与教育 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 193-200.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

关系复杂性对关系类别间接性学习的影响

张恒超1, 阴国恩2   

  1. 1. 天津商业大学法学院心理学系, 天津300134;
    2. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津300074
  • 出版日期:2012-03-15 发布日期:2012-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 张恒超,E-mail:zhhengch@sohu.com E-mail:zhhengch@sohu.com
  • 基金资助:
    天津市教育科学“十二五”规划重点课题(HE2014);天津商业大学法学院特别资助项目(FT003)

The Influence of the Relational Complexity upon the Indirect Learning of Relational Category

ZHANG Heng-chao1, YIN Guo-en2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology in Tianjin University Commerce, Tianjin 300134;
    2. Academy of Psychology and Behavior in Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074
  • Online:2012-03-15 Published:2012-03-15

摘要: 以216名大学生为被试,使用关系复杂性变化的三种虚拟外星生物实验材料,创设个人功能预测的关系类别的间接性学习条件和参照性交流功能预测的关系类别的间接性学习条件,探讨关系复杂性对关系类别间接性学习的影响。结果发现:关系类别的功能预测间接性学习过程中,关系复杂性和学习条件的交互作用极其显著,具体来讲,关系复杂性对关系类别间接性学习的影响仅显著地表现在参照性交流关系类别间接性学习过程中;当学习材料为4特征复杂关系时,参照条件下被试功能预测成绩极其显著高于个人条件,当学习材料为6特征复杂关系加二阶同功能简单关系时,两种学习条件间不存在显著差异,当学习材料为6特征复杂关系加二阶异功能简单关系时,个人条件极其显著高于参照条件。

关键词: 关系复杂性, 关系类别, 间接性学习, 参照性交流, 参照惯例

Abstract: 216 undergraduate students participated in the current study.The study designed three kinds of experimental materials.The relational complexity is constantly changing.It arranged the condition of indirect category learning of individual functional prediction and the condition of indirect category learning relation to referential communication.This study explored the influence of the relational complexity upon the indirect learning of relational category.The results showed that:The learning effect of referential communication condition changes with relational complexity during the function prediction under the condition of indirect learning of relational category.The participants under the condition of referential communication scored significantly higher points than individual condition during the indirect learning of 4 features'complex relation.There is no significant difference during the indirect learning of 6 features' complex relation plus second-order same function simple relation.The participants under individual condition scored significantly higher points than the condition of referential communication during the indirect learning of 6 features'complex relation plus second-order different function simple relation.

Key words: relational complexity, relational category, indirect learning, referential communication, referential convention

中图分类号: 

  • G442
[1] Bangerter,A.,&Clark,H.H.(2003).Navigating joint projects with dialogue.Cognitive Science,27(2),195-225.
[2] Barr,D.J.,&Kronmuller,E.(2006).Conversation as a site of category learning and category use.Psychology of Learning and Motivation,47,181-211.
[3] Blair,M.,&Homa,D.L.(2005).Integrating novel dimensions to eliminate category exceptions:when more is less.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,31(2), 258-271.
[4] Brennan,S.E.,Chen,X.,Dickinson,C.A.,Neider,M.B.,& Zelinsky,G.J.(2008).Coordinating cognition:The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search.Cognition,106(3),1465-1477.
[5] Brown,Schmidt,S.(2009).Partner specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.Journal of Memory and Language,in press.
[6] Clark,H.H.(1996).Using language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[7] Clark,H.H.,&Krych,M.(2004).Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding.Journal of Memory and Language,50 (1),62-81.
[8] Corter,J.,&Gluck,M.(1992).Explaining basic categories:Feature predictability and information.Psychological Bulletin,111(2),291-303.
[9] Gentner,D.,&Kurtz,K.(2005).Relational categories.In W.K. Ahn.,R.L.,Goldstone.,B.C.Love.,A.B.Markman.,&P.W.Wolff.(Eds.),Categorization inside and outside the lab(pp.151-175).Washington,DC:APA.
[10] Hulstijn,J.,&Maudet,N.(2006).Uptake and joint action.Cognitive Systems Research,7(2-3),175-191.
[11] Johnson,D.W.,&Johnson,R.T.(1989).Cooperation and Competition:Theory and Research.Edina,MN:Interaction Book Company.
[12] Kronmüller,E.,&Barr,D.J.(2007).Perspective free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery from preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language,56(3),436-455.
[13] Lombrozo,T.(2007).Simplicity and probability in causal explanation. Cognitive Psychology,55(3),232-257. Malt,B.C.,&Sloman,S.A.(2004).Conversation and convention: Enduring influences on name choice for common objects.Memory and Cognition,32(8),1346-1354.
[14] Markman,A.B.,&Makin,V.S.(1998).Referential communication and category acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127(4),331-354.
[15] Markman,A.B.,&Ross,B.H.(2003).Category use and category learning.Psychological Bulletin,4(129),592-613.
[16] Nosofsky,R.M.,Stanton,R.D.,&Zaki,S.R.(2005). Procedural interference in perceptual classification:Implicit learning or cognitive complexity?Memory&Cognition,33(7),1256-1271.
[17] Pietarinen,A.V.(2006).The evolution of semantics and language? games for meaning.Interaction Studies,7(1),79-104.
[18] Pothos,E.M.,&Close,J.(2008).One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification:A simplicity approach.Cognition,107(2),581-602.
[19] Shintel,H.,&Keysar,B.(2009).Less is more:A minimalist account of joint action in communication.Topics in Cognitive Science,1(2),260-273.
[20] Stalnaker,R.C.(2002).Common ground.Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5-6),701-721.
[21] Todd,P.,&Gigerenzer,G.(2007).Environments that make us smart:Ecological rationality.Current Directions in Psychological Science,16(3),167-171.
[22] Tyl'en,K.,Weed,E.,Wallentin,M.,Roepstorff,A.,&Frith,C.(2010).Language as a tool for interacting minds.Mind&Language,25(1),3-29.
[23] Wilkes-Gibbs,D.,&Clark,H.(1992).Coordinating beliefs in conversation.Journal of Memory and Language,31(2),183-194.
[24] 张恒超,阴国恩(2010).学习方式对关系类别间接性学习的影响.心理与行为研究,8(4),257-262.
[1] 张恒超. 参照性交流双方学习过程与选择性注意的比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 55-60,74.
[2] 张恒超. 参照性交流中的“听者设计”[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(5): 552-560.
[3] 胡清芬, 辛自强, 张莉, 张丽. 儿童图形表征能力测验编制的初步报告[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 113-118.
[4] 辛自强. 关系-表征复杂性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(3): 122-128.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!