面孔识别特异性本质的ERP研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究记录了16名被试在完成有整体结构变化和局部特征变化的面孔/房屋图片的一致性判断时的脑内时程变化,以期对面孔识别的特异性本质进行探讨。结果显示,N170波幅和潜伏期的刺激类型主效应显著;面孔/房屋所诱发的N170成分在波幅和潜伏期上均不存在加工方式上的显著差异。晚期成分(300～700ms)上也得到类似的结果。这表明:面孔与房屋(非面孔)的加工在早期和晚期成分上都有差异性,体现出面孔的加工在早期视觉刺激的加工和晚期识别的加工上都具有特异性;晚期识别加工的脑电结果不支持"面孔识别是整体的,结构的,而非面孔客体的识别是局部的,基于特征的"加工观点。

关键词: 事件相关电位, 面孔识别, 特异性, N170, 半球优势

Abstract: The present study employed the event-related brain potentials to record time courses when 16 normal young participants made consistency judgment to face/house stimuli with structural/partial changes.The aim is to reveal the nature of specificity of face recognition.The results showed N170 amplitude and latency had a significant main effect at stimulus type.Compared with the non-face stimuli,faces evoked a higher amplitude and shorter latency of N170;there wasn't a significant difference in processing at amplitude and latency of N170 component between face/non-face stimuli.Late components in the time window from 300-700 msec also had similar results. These results indicated the processing of faces and houses(non-face)were different in early and late components, reflecting the specificity of face recognition in early and late time windows.The late ERP components didn't support that the face processing was whole and structural and non-face object processing was local,part-based.

Key words: event-related potentials, face recognition, specificity, N170, hemispheric dominance

中图分类号:

B844.3

李明芳, 张烨, 贾磊, 李婷, 李伟霞, 张庆林. 面孔识别特异性本质的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(5): 459-467.

LI Ming-fang, ZHANG Ye, JIA Lei, LI Ting, LI Wei-xia, ZHANG Qing-lin. Neural Mechanism of Face Specific Recognition[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(5): 459-467.

参考文献

[1] Bentin,S.,Allison,T.,Puce,A.,Perez,E.,&McCarthy,G. (1996).Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans.Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences,8,551-565.
[2] Duchaine,B.,&Nakayama,K.(2005).Dissociations of face and object recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,17,249-261.
[3] Freire,A.,Lee,K.,&Symons,L.A.(2000).The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information:direct evisis dence.Perception,29,159-170.
[4] Harris,A.,&Agrirre,G.K.(2008).The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20,863-878.
[5] Hayward,W.,Rhodes,G.,&Schwaninger,A.(2008).An own-race advantage for components as well as configurationsin face recognition.Cognition,106,1017-1027.
[6] Itier,R.J.,&Taylor,M.J.(2004).N170 or N1?Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs.Cereb Cortex,14,132-142.
[7] Kanwisher,N.(2000).Domain specificity in face perception.Nature Neurosciences,3,759-763.
[8] Kanwisher,N.,McDermott,J.,&Chun,M.M.(1997).The fusiform face area:a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception.Journal of Neuroscience,17,4302-4311.
[9] Kanwisher,N.,&Yovel,G.(2006).The fusiform face area:A cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,B(361),2109-2128.
[10] Leder,H.&Carbon,C.C.(2006).Face-specific configural processing of relational information.British Journal of Psychology, 97,19-29.
[11] Le Grand,R.,Mondloch,C.J.,Maurer,D.,&Brent,H.P. (2001).Early visual experience and face processing.Nature,410, 890.
[12] Li,S.Z.,Chu,R.,Ao,M.,Zhang,L.,&He,R.(2006).Highly accurate and fast face recognition using near infrared images.International Conference on Advances in Biometrics,3832,151-158.
[13] Liu,J.,Harris,A.,&Kanwisher,N.(2009).Perception of face parts and face configurations:An fMRI study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,22,203-211.
[14] Liu,J.,Higuchi,M.,Marantz,A.,&Kanwisher,N.(2000).Magnetophysiological studies of face and non-face processing.Neuroreport,11,337-341.
[15] Mondloch,C.J.,Le Grand,R.,&Maurer,D.(2002).Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.Perception,31,553-566.
[16] Moscovitch,M.,Winocur,G.,&Behrmann,M.(1997).What is special about face recognition?Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition.Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences,9,555-604.
[17] Rajimehr,R.,Young,J.C.,&Tootell,R.B.H.(2009).An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex,predicted by macaque maps.Neuroseience,106,1995-2000.
[18] Riddoch,M.,Johnston,R.,Bracewell,R.,Boutsen,L.,&Humphreys,G.(2008).Are faces special?A case of pure prosopagnosia.Cognitive Neuropsychology,25,3-26.
[19] Riesenhuber,M.,Jarudi,I.,Gilad,S.,&Sinha,P.(2004).Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,B,Biological Sciences,271,448-450.
[20] Rossion,B.,&Gauthier,I.(2002).How does the brain Proeess upright and inverted faces?Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Review,1,62-74.
[21] Rossion,B.,Gauthier,I.,Tarr,M.J.,Despland,P.A.,Bruyer,R.,Linotte,S.,&Crommelinck,M.,(2000).The N170 occipito-temporal component is enhanced and delayed to inverted faces but not to inverted objects:an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain.NeuroReport,11,69-74.
[22] Rossion,B.,&Jacques,C.(2008).Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain?Ten lessons on the N170.Neuroimage,39,1959-1979.
[23] Rossion,B.,Joyce,C.A.,Cottrell,G.W.,&Tarrb,M.G. (2003).Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face,word,and object processing in the visual cortex.NeuroImage,20,1609-1624.
[24] Schiltz,C.,Dricot,L.,Goebe,R.,&Rossion,B.(2010).Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middlefusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion.Journal of Vision,10,1-16.
[25] Sekuler,A.,Gaspar,C.,Gold,J.,&Bennett,P.(2004).Inversion Leads to Quantitative,Not Qualitative,Changes in Face Processing.Current Biology,14,391-396.
[26] Tanaka,J.W.,&Farah,M.J.(1993).Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46,225-245.
[27] Wei,J.H.,Peng,D.L.,Yang,Z.L.,Chan,T.C.,&Luo,Y.J. (2001).The hemispheric difference of semantic processing of Chinese characters in two dimensions as revealed by ERPs.NeuroReport,12, 3697-3701.
[28] Xu,Y.D.,Liu,J.,&Kanwisher,N.(2005).The M170 is selective for faces,not for expertise.Neuropsychologia,43,588-597.
[29] Yin,R.(1969).Looking at upside down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81,141-145.
[30] Yovel,G.,&Kanwisher,N.(2004).Face perception:domain specific,not process specific.Neuron,44,889-898.
[31] 刘华孝,周国梅.(2010).面孔识别的整体/分析加工研究范式.心理科学,33,436-438.
[32] 李明芳,张烨,张庆林.(2010).面孔识别中脑电成分N170的研究概述.心理科学进展,18,1942-1948.
[33] 李晓白,朱棋,刘嘉.(2009).行为遗传学:解决面孔特异性问题争论的新思路.心理科学进展,17,284-293.
[34] 彭小虎,王国锋,魏景汉,罗跃嘉.(2004).面孔识别特异性脑机制ERP研究.航天医学与医学工程,17,438-443.
[35] 王哲,葛列众,孙宇浩.(2006).人脸特征信息反转效应的实验研究.心理科学,29,1351-1353.

相关文章 15

[1]	钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 语言范畴影响面部表情知觉的电生理学证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 313-322.
[2]	白荣, 闫嵘, 王千, 李叶, 邢淑芬. 学前儿童执行功能与问题行为的关系:情境和性别的特异性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[3]	沈洋, 袁文颖, 赵小淋, 姜珂, 彭茂莹, 陈禹, 杨娟. 死亡凸显对自我姓名注意瞬脱对抗效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 520-527.
[4]	陈琼, 赵俊峰, 谷璜, 邢小莉, 李晓铭. 听障儿童认知抑制控制的脑电特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 275-282.
[5]	俞稼钰, 王芩芩, 梁丹丹. 学龄期普通话特异性语言损伤儿童体习得——来自词汇体和语法体组合加工的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 203-209.
[6]	马原啸, 陈旭. 阈下安全启动改善非安全依恋女性的注意加工[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 11-22.
[7]	刘宇飞, 钱怡, 宋耀武, 毕鸿燕. 4~6岁汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 65-72.
[8]	张豹, 黄赛, 侯秋霞. 网络游戏成瘾者注意焦点转换功能的特异性损伤研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 533-539.
[9]	宋娟, 吕勇, 沈德立. 物体分类任务中线索效应的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 113-120.
[10]	卢张龙, 吕勇, 沈德立. 内隐序列学习与注意负荷关系的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 561-568.
[11]	吕勇, 宋娟. 继时呈现条件下类别归纳过程的ERPs研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 14-23.
[12]	张凤华, 邱江, 杨群, 张庆林. 传递性推理的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(4): 68-74.
[13]	蒋长好, 郭德俊, 赵仑, 张钦, 王振宏, 方平. 大中学生对悲伤与愉快面孔区分的特征比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 38-44.
[14]	梁福成, 王雪艳. 认知事件相关电位P300与儿童青少年工作记忆的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(1): 29-34.
[15]	邓赐平. 幼儿心理理论表现的任务特异性分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 19(3): 23-28.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed