不同类别学习方式的对比研究

心理发展与教育 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 61-67.

不同类别学习方式的对比研究

刘凤英^1,2, 李红¹, 张庆林¹, 姚志刚³

1. 西南大学心理学院, 重庆市基础心理学重点实验室, 重庆, 400715;
2. 吉林师范大学教育科学学院, 四平, 136000;
3. 吉林师范大学博达学院, 四平, 136000

出版日期:2008-10-15 发布日期:2008-10-15
通讯作者: 张庆林,西南大学心理学院教授.E-mail:zhangql@swu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangql@swu.edu.cn
基金资助:
西南大学基础心理学国家级重点学科项目(西国重04019)资助

A Comparative Study of Different Types of Category Learning

LIU Feng-ying^1,2, LI Hong¹, ZHANG Qing-lin¹, YAO Zhi-gang³

1. School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
2. School of Education Science, Jilin Normal University, Siping 136000;
3. School of Boda, Jilin Normal University, Siping 136000

Online:2008-10-15 Published:2008-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 55名被试被随机分配到两个组,分别通过分类学习与推理学习来学习两个类别,之后,两组被试对新的测试项目进行典型性评定,考察类别学习方式对类别表征的影响。研究结果表明,分类学习者仅仅依据项目的诊断性程度来评定,而推理学习者主要依据项目的典型性程度来评定。所以,诊断性信息在分类学习者的类别表征中占有重要位置,典型性信息在推理学习者的类别表征中占有重要位置,即分类学习与推理学习导致的类别表征不同。

关键词: 类别学习, 类别表征, 诊断性信息, 典型性信息

Abstract: This study was intended to investigate the effects of category learning types on category representation.55 Subjects were divided into two groups randomly and were asked to learn two categories through classification learning and inference learning respectively,then,subjects of two groups were told to rate typicality for the new test items.The results suggested that the classification learners rated the typicality merely by the diagnostic level of the test items and the inference learners rated the typicality mainly by the typical level of the test items.Therefore,diagnostic information played important role in classification learners'category representation,while typical information played important role in inference learners'category representation,that is,different category learning types resulted in different category representation.

Key words: category learning, category representation, diagnostic information, typical information

中图分类号:

G442

刘凤英, 李红, 张庆林, 姚志刚. 不同类别学习方式的对比研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(4): 61-67.

LIU Feng-ying, LI Hong, ZHANG Qing-lin, YAO Zhi-gang. A Comparative Study of Different Types of Category Learning[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(4): 61-67.

参考文献

[1] Anderson J.The adaptive naitlre of human categorization.Psychological Review,1991,98(3),629-647.
[2] Celman S.Markman E M.Categories and induction in young children.Cognition,1986,23(3),183-209.
[3] DavidsonN,C,elman S.Inductionsfrom novel categories:The role d language and conceptual structure.Cognitive Development,1990,5(2),151-176.
[4] Yamauchi T,Marknum A B.Category learning by inference and classification.Journal of Memory and Language,1998,39(1),124-148.
[5] Yamanchl T,love B,Marknmn A B.Learning nonlincarly separable categories by inferenee and classification.Joumal of Experimental Psychology:teaming,Memory,and Cognition,2002,28(3),585-593.
[6] Jane E E,Chin-Parker R B.Inference and classification learning of abstract coherent categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology:learning.Memory,and Cognition,2005,31(1),86-89.
[7] Yamauchi T,Markman A B.Learning categories colIlposed of varying instances:the effect of classification,inference,and structural alignment.Memory & Cognition,2000b,28(1),64-78.
[8] 刘志雅,奠雷.类别学习中两种学习模式的比较研究:分类学习与推理学习.心理学报,2006,38(6),824-832.
[9] Anderson A,Ross B,Chin-Parker S.A further investication of categorylearning by inference.Memory & Cognition,2002,30(1),119-128.
[10] Arthur B,Markumn A B.Ross B.Category use and category Learning.Psychological Bulletin,2003,129(4),592-613.
[11] Chin-Parker S,Ross B.Dingnosticity and prototypicality in categnry learning:a comparison of inference learning and classification.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2004,30(1),216-226.
[12] Ahn W,Medin D.A two-stage model of category eonstruction.Cognitive Science,1992,16(1),81-121.
[13] Medin D,Wattenmaker W.Hampson S.Family resemblance,conceptual cohesiveness,and category construction.Cognitive Psychology,1987.19(2).242-279.
[14] Nosofsky R,Palmeri T,Mckinley S.Rule-plus-exception model of classificmion learning.Psychological Review,1994.101(1),53-97.
[15] Nosofsky R,Clark S,Shin H.Rules and exemplars in categorization,identification,and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1989,15(2),282-384.
[16] Lassaline M,Murphy G.Induction and category coherence.Psychenomic Bdletin & Review,1996,3,95-99.
[17] Rosch E,Mervis C,Gray W,et al.Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,1976,8(3),382-439.
[18] Ross B.Classification and the effects of interaction with instranees.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1996,22(3).763-753.
[19] Whittlesea B,Brooks L,Westcott C.After the learning is over factors controlling the selective application of general and particular knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology:learning,Memory,and Cognition,1994,20(2),259-274.
[20] Yanmuchi T,Markaum A B.Inference Using Categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2000a,26(3).776-795.
[21] Basalou L.Access andinferencein categorization.Bulletin of the Psychonemic Society,1990,28,268-271.
[22] Solomon K,Medin D,Lynch E.Concepts do more than categorize.Trendsin Cognitive Science,1999,3(3),99-104.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed