亲社会与攻击性儿童在两类假设情境中的社会信息加工特点

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用问卷调查法,分别测查、比较了亲社会儿童、攻击性儿童与一般儿童的社会信息加工(SIP)特点,目的是探讨三类儿童在SIP上是否存在差异。结果表明,在假设分享情境中,攻击性与一般儿童SIP的整体差异不显著,但在对不分享策略的他人情绪预期和关系预期2个变量上差异显著。亲社会与一般儿童、与攻击性儿童SIP的整体差异显著;在假设挑衅情境中,攻击性与一般儿童在对不同策略的自我效能感、选择频率、策略评价等7个变量上差异显著。亲社会与一般儿童在对不同策略的自我效能感、选择频率、策略评价等9个变量上差异显著;亲社会儿童与一般儿童SIP的整体不存在显著差异。

关键词: 亲社会儿童, 攻击性儿童, 社会信息加工(SIP), 假设挑衅情境, 假设分享情境

Abstract: A normative primary school children sample of 572 children(308 boys,264 girls,average age=10116) participated in this study.Assessments included peer reports of social behavior that was used to divide children into three groups (prosocial,average and aggressive) and self2reports of several elements of social-information2processing (SIP) in hypothetical provocation situation and hypothetical sharing situation.ANOVA and MANOVA were employed to explore the SIP differences among above three groups of children.The results showed that: (1) In hypothetical provocation situation,compared with the average children,aggressive children's global SIP pattern is marginal significantly different and it is the same with prosocial children.Prosocial children's global SIP pattern is significantly different from aggressive children's.(2) In hypothetical sharing situation,compared with the average children,prosocial children's global SIP is significantly different,whereas the aggressive children's is not,which means maybe only prosocial children have the unique SIP pattern which is different from the average children's and aggressive children's.

Key words: prosocial children, aggressive children, social-information-processing, hypothetical provocative situation, hypothetical sharing situation

中图分类号:

B844.1

马艳, 寇彧. 亲社会与攻击性儿童在两类假设情境中的社会信息加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 1-8.

MA Yan, KOU Yu. Prosocial and Aggressive Children’s Social-Information-Processing in Two Types of Hypothetical Situations[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(4): 1-8.

参考文献

[1] Crick N R,Dodge K A.A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment.Psychological Bulletin,1994,115(1):74-101.
[2] Perry D G,Perry L C.Applications of Dodge's social information processing model of social competence to the study of presocial behavior in children.Meeting of the international society for the study of behavior development,Tokyo,Japan,July,1987.
[3] Nelson D A,Crick N R.Rose-colored glasses:Examining the social information-processing of presocial young adolescents.Journal of Early Adolescence,1999,19(1):17-38.
[4] Nelson D A.Social information-processing patterns and prosocial behavior:A longitudinal study.Ph.D.Thesis.USA:University of Minnesota,1999.
[5] 寇彧,马艳.儿童社会适应的社会信息加工模型及其特殊应用,心理与行为研究,2004,2(1):388-393.
[6] 寇彧,谭晨,马艳.攻击性儿童与亲社会儿童社会信息加工特点比较及研究展望,心理科学进展,2005,13(1):59-65.
[7] 方积乾.医学统计学与电脑实验(2版).上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001.
[8] Crick N R,Grotpeter J K.Relational aggression,gender,and social-psychological adjustment.Child Development,1995,66:710-722.
[9] Greener S H.Peer assessment of children's prosocial behavior.Journal of Moral Education,2000,29(1):47-60.
[10] Crick N R.Relational aggression:the role of intent attributions,feelings of distress,and provocation type.Development and Pathology,1995,7:313-322.

相关文章 15

[1]	周海丽, 周晖. 4～7岁儿童基于不同可信度特质和情景的信任判断[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 570-576.
[2]	朱颖, 刘亚鹏, 张光珍, 张印平, 梁宗保, 叶明, 邓慧华. 儿童早期情绪性对学步期父母养育方式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 577-584.
[3]	李燕芳, 徐良苑, 吕莹, 刘丽君, 王耘. 母子关系、师幼关系与学前流动儿童的社会适应行为[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 624-634.
[4]	卢淳, 郭红力, 司继伟, 孙燕. 不同数字线下儿童与成人分数估计的表征模式[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 449-456.
[5]	刘妮娜, 仝文, 闫国利. 4~7岁儿童汉字正字法意识的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 457-465.
[6]	陈光辉. 儿童欺负/受欺负与同伴网络的关系：p^*模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 474-481.
[7]	陆凤英, 汤永隆, 曹梦露, 刘晓军. 儿童虐待与戒毒动机：自我概念的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 527-532.
[8]	马凤玲, 汤玉龙, 郑婷婷, 徐芬. 3~5岁幼儿基于面孔的信任判断的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 337-344.
[9]	吴海珍, 赵蕾, 卢英俊. 莫扎特音乐对幼儿时空推理能力影响的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 345-354.
[10]	钟佑洁, 李艳华, 张进辅. 儿童攻击行为的短期追踪干预研究：从社会信息加工的角度[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 225-233.
[11]	李占星, 曹贤才, 庞维国, 牛玉柏. 6~10岁儿童对损人情境下行为者的道德情绪判断与归因[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 252-258.
[12]	古丽努尔·阿扎提, 苏彦捷, 于文. 孤独症个体的谎言理解及其与对自我/他人错误信念理解的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 113-120.
[13]	聂晋文, 芦咏莉. 父亲参与对儿童延迟满足能力的影响：儿童性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 121-128.
[14]	郝振, 崔丽娟. 受歧视知觉对流动儿童社会融入的影响：中介机制及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 137-144.
[15]	倪士光, 李虹. 流动儿童认同整合与歧视知觉的关系：社会支持和应对方式的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 31-38.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed