学习判断准确性的研究方法

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 学习判断是元认知判断的一种重要形式,是指被试对其后测成绩的预测.准确性是学习判断研究的重要问题.学习判断准确性分为绝对准确性和相对准确性.本文重点介绍相对准确性的传统研究方法和修正方法,即预测前回忆和监测法.在比较两种相对准确性的研究方法在数据的收集和分析上的差别,提出传统方法在数据收集过程中只能通过假设推断学习判断判断前的提取过程,修正方法在数据收集时,在学习判断前插入一个回忆阶段,可以监测学习判断判断前的提取过程.应用修正方法使研究者既可分解总的准确性,又可通过加权平均数的算法合成总的准确性.因此该方法有助于研究者更加深入、精确地研究学习判断以及其他元认知判断问题.

关键词: 学习判断, 相对准确性, 修正方法

Abstract: As an important metacognitive judgment,judgment of learning(JOL) is the prediction about the future performance of learned materials.Accuracy is an important problem in the study of JOL and metacognition monitoring.There are two kinds of JOL accuracies,one is absolute JOL accuracy,and the other is relative JOL accuracy.In the article,the previous method and a revised method-pre-judgment recall and monitoring(PRAM) is described for research on metacognitive monitoring,especially judgments of learning(JOLs).We compared the previous method with PRAM,and figured out that PRAM can investigate psychological processing that previously has been only hypothetical and unobservable.During data collection a new stage of recall occurs just prior to the JOLs,so that during data analysis items can be partitioned into subcategories to measure the degree of JOL accuracy in way that are more analytic than was previously possi ble.A weighted-average combinatorial rule allows the component measures of JOL accuracy to be combined into the usual overall measure of metacognitve accuracy.So,investigators can research on JOL and other metacognitive judgments more analytically and exactly.

Key words: JOL, absolute accuracy, relative accuracy, PRAM

中图分类号:

B841

贾宁, 白学军, 沈德立. 学习判断准确性的研究方法[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(3): 103-109.

JIA Ning, BAI Xue-jun, SHEN De-li. Research Methods of the Accuracy of Judgment in Learning[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(3): 103-109.

参考文献

[1] Nelson T O,Narens L.Why investignte metacognition? In J.Metcalfe & A.Shimamura(Eds.),metacognition:Knowing about Knowing.Cambridge,MA:Bradford Books.1994,6.
[2] Meeter M,Nelson T O.Multiple study trials and judgments of learning.Acta Psychologica,2003,113,123-132.
[3] 陈功香,傅小兰.内外部线索对学习判断的影响.心理学报,2003,35,(2),172-177.
[4] Arbuckle T,Cuddy L.Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,1969,81,126-131.
[5] Dunlosky J,Nelson T O.Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning and the delayed JOL-effect.Memory and Cognition,1992,20,373-380.
[6] Koriat A.Monitoring one's own knowledge during study:a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,1997,126,349-370.
[7] Lovelace E A.Metamemory:monitoring future recallability during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition,1984,10,756-766.
[8] Nelson T O,Dunlosky,J.When people's judgment of learning are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall:the delayed JOL effect.Psychological Science,1991,2,267-270.
[9] Tabor Connor,L,Dunlosky J,Hertzog C.Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy.Psychology and Aging,1997,12(1),50-71.
[10] Scheck P,Meeter M,Nelson T O.Anchoring effect in absolute accuracy of immediate versus delayed judgments of learning.Journal of Memory and Language,2004,51,71-79.
[11] Thiede K W,Dunlosky J.Delaying students' metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,1994,86,290-302.
[12] Simon D A,Bjork R A.Metacogntion in motor learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition.2001,27,907-912.
[13] 陈功香,傅小兰.学习判断及其准确性.心理科学进展,2004,12(2),176-184.
[14] 唐卫海,刘希平,方格.记忆监测研究综述.心理科学,2003,26(4),713-716.
[15] Nelson T O,Narens L.A revised methodology for research on metamemory:pre-judgment recall and monitoring(PRAM).Psychological Methods,2004,9(1),53-69.
[16] Nelson T O.A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological Bulletin,1984,95,109-133.
[17] 屈军,韩凯.模糊再认(FR)判断-元记忆领域的新方法.心理学报,1995,27(2),127-132.
[18] Koriat A,Ma' ayan H.The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning.Journal of memory and language,2005,52,478-492.
[19] Freeman L.Order-based statistics and monotonicity:A family of ordinal measures of association.Journal of Mathematical Sociology,1986,12,49-69.
[20] Kelemen W L,Weaver C A.Enhanced metamemory at delays:why do judgments of learning improve over time? Journal of experimental psychology:learning,memory,and cognition,1997,23,1394-1409.
[21] Nelson T O Dunlosky J.How shall we explain the delayed-judgments-of-learning effect? Psychological Science,1992,3,317-318.
[22] Spellman B A,Bjork R A.People's judgments of learning are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall when retrieval practice mediates both tasks.Psychological Science,1992,3,315-316.
[23] Gonzalez R,Nelson T O.Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores.Psychological Bulletion,1996,119,159-165.
[24] Nelson T O,Narens L.A new technique for investigating the feeling of knowing.Acta Psychologica,1980,46,69-80.
[25] Nelson T O.Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item,not of the absolute performance on an individual item.Applied cognitive psychology,1996,10,257-260.
[26] Koriat A.How do we know that we know? The accessibility model.of the feeling of knowing.Psyhological Review,1993,100,609-639.
[27] Schreiber T A.Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cues recall:Implications for the cue.Memory & Cognition,1998,26,553-571.
[28] Connor L T,Dunlosky J.Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy.Psychology and Aging,1997,12(1),50-71.
[29] Hertzog C,Kidder D P,Powell-Moman A,et al.Aging and monitoring associative learning:Is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired? Psychology and Aging,2002,17(2),209-225.
[30] Lichtenstein S,Fischhoff B.Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,1997,20,159-183.
[31] Koriat A,Sheffer L,Ma'ayan H.Comparing objective and subjective learning curves:judgment of learning exhibit increased underconfidencewith-practice.Journal of experimental psychology:General,2002,131,147-162.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed