大学生实时距、空时距估计的比较研究

心理发展与教育 ›› 2003, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 58-62.

大学生实时距、空时距估计的比较研究

郭秀艳, 聂晶

华东师范大学心理系, 上海, 200062

出版日期:2003-07-15 发布日期:2003-07-15
作者简介:郭秀艳(1970- ),女,汉族,黑龙江宁安人,华东师范大学心理学系副教授,博士.guoxiuyon@orline.sh.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(301703210)

A Comparative Research on Estimation of Blank Time Duration and Full Time Duration in College Students

GUO Xiu-yan, NIE Jing

Department of Psychology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062

Online:2003-07-15 Published:2003-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用2(空时距、实时距)×8(1秒～8秒)的实验设计,以224名大学生为被试,考察了不同类型、不同长度的时距估计特点,结果发现;(1)时距类型在时距估计中存在主效应,在本实验中,1秒～8秒条件下实时距估计比空时距准确;(2)时距长度在时距估计中存在主效应,时距估计所产生的误差随时距长度的增加而增大;(3)时距类型与时距长度之间存在交互作用,对实时距、空时距估计进行曲线估计及预测,发现两类时距估计呈现动态特征,1845052秒之前实时距估计比空时距准确,之后空时距估计比实时距准确,两类时距估计曲线的变化速度也呈交替上升趋势。

关键词: 空时距, 实时距, 时距估计, 曲线估计

Abstract: 2 (type of time duration)×8 (length of time duration) mixed experiment was designed to examine the effect of type and length of time duration on time estimation in which 224 students participated.The results are as follows; (1) Main effect of the type of time duration is significant,The estimation of full time duration is more precise than blank time duration between 1s and 8s,(2) Main effect of the length of time duration is significant,the error increased with the length of time duration.(3) The interaction between type and length of time duration is significant,estimation of full time duration is more precise than blank time duration before 18。45052s.

Key words: blank time duration, full time duration, estimation of time duration, curve estimation

中图分类号:

B842.1

郭秀艳, 聂晶. 大学生实时距、空时距估计的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 19(3): 58-62.

GUO Xiu-yan, NIE Jing. A Comparative Research on Estimation of Blank Time Duration and Full Time Duration in College Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2003, 19(3): 58-62.

参考文献

[1] 徐青,魏琳.时间知觉与估计的认知理论综述.应用心理学,2002,8(2):58-64.
[2] Paul Fraisse.Perception and estimation of time.Annual Review of Psychology,1984,(35):1-36.
[3] 张述祖,沈德立.基础心理学.教育科学出版社,1987,362-365.
[4] Scott W.Brown,Marilyn G.Bolz.Attentional Processes in Time Perception:Effects of Mental Workload and Event Structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,2002,28(3):600-615.
[5] Ingrid R.Olson Marvin,M.Chun.Temporal Contextual Cuing of Visual Attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2001,27(5):1299-1313.
[6] Boris Burle,Laurence Casini.Dissociation Between Activation and Attention Effects in Time Estimation:Implications for Internal Clock Models.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,2001,27(1):195-205.
[7] 杨博民.心理实验纲要.北京大学出版社,1987,7:221-231.
[8] 林仲贤,刘颂.影响时间知觉差异性的一些因素实验研究.心理科学,1991,14(2):7-12.
[9] 卢纹岱.SPSS for windows统计分析.电子工业出版社,2000:302-308.
[10] 方格,冯刚,姜涛等.学前儿童对时间的估计及其策略.心理学报,1993,25(4):346-352..
[11] 方格,冯刚,方富熹.学前儿童对短时时距的比较及其认知策略.心理科学,1994,17(1):3-9.
[12] 姜涛,方格.小学儿童对习俗时间的时距判断.心理学报,1997,29(2):152-159.
[13] 杨姗,方格.儿童时距认知的研究简介及发展趋向.心理学动态,1997,6(1):20-25.
[14] 黄希庭,徐光国.对变化/分割模型的检验(Ⅰ).心理学报,1997,29(3):326-333.
[15] 黄希庭,徐光国.对变化/分割模型的检验(Ⅱ).心理学报,1999,31(2):135-141.
[16] 黄希庭,张志杰.时距估计干扰效应的研究与思考.西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,27(4):84-88

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed