心理发展与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 499-509.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.04.05

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

敬畏与助人的关系:自我-他人重叠的中介作用

王国芳1, 田淑萍2, 胥子健3, 陈嘉晔1, 杨敏齐4,5   

  1. 1. 中国政法大学社会学院, 北京 100088;
    2. 国家移民管理局, 北京 100018;
    3. 承德医学院心理学系, 承德 067000;
    4. 郑州大学教育学院, 郑州 450001;
    5. 郑州大学马克思主义学院, 郑州 450001
  • 发布日期:2024-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 杨敏齐 E-mail:minqi_yang@zzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(20BZZ069);河南省博士后科研启动项目一等资助(58)。

The Relationship between Awe and Helping: The Mediating Role of Self-other Overlap

WANG Guofang1, TIAN Shuping2, XU Zijian3, CHEN Jiaye1, YANG Minqi4,5   

  1. 1. School of Sociology, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088;
    2. National Immigration Administration, Beijing 100018;
    3. Department of Psychology, Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000;
    4. School of Education, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001;
    5. School of Marxism, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001
  • Published:2024-08-27

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 为探索特质性敬畏与状态性敬畏与助人之间的关系及其心理机制,研究一采用问卷法探讨了特质性敬畏与助人行为的关系及自我-他人重叠的中介作用;研究二采用实验法探讨了状态性敬畏对助人行为的影响及自我-他人重叠的中介作用。结果表明:(1)个体的特质性敬畏水平越高,其助人行为水平也越高;(2)自我-他人重叠在特质性敬畏情绪与助人行为间起不完全中介作用;(3)与中性情绪相比,状态性敬畏能显著增加个体的金钱助人行为,但对时间助人行为没有显著影响;(4)自我-他人重叠在状态性敬畏与时间助人行为间起中介作用。研究从自我-他人之间联系的角度揭示了敬畏影响助人的作用机制,拓展了敬畏与社会行为的关系研究。

关键词: 特质性敬畏, 状态性敬畏, 自我-他人重叠, 助人行为

Abstract: To explore the relationship between dispositional awe and situational awe and helping and its psychological mechanism, Study 1, as a survey, was aimed to explore the relationship between dispositional awe and helping behavior, as well as the mediating effect of self-other overlap, and Study 2, as an experimental study, was aimed to explore the influence of situational awe on helping behavior and the mediating role of self-other overlap. The results showed that: (1) Dispositional awe was positively correlated with helping behavior; (2) Self-other overlap played a partially mediating role between trait awe and helping behavior; (3) Compared with neutral emotion, situational awe could significantly increase the individual’s money helping behavior, but has no significant effect on time helping behavior; (4) Self-other overlap played a mediating role between situational awe and helping behavior. The study revealed the mechanism of awe affecting helping behavior from the perspective of the connection between self and others, and expanded the researches on the relationship between awe and social behaviors.

Key words: dispositional awe, situational awe, self-other overlap, helping

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241-253.
Aronson, E., Bridgeman, D. L., & Geffner, R. (1978). Interdependent interactions and prosocial behavior.Journal of Research & Development in Education, 12(1), 16-27.
Bai, Y., Maruskin, L. A., Chen, S., Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., McNeil, G. D., … Keltner, D. (2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 185-209.
Bonner, E. T., & Friedman, H. L. (2011). A conceptual clarification of the experience of awe: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.The Humanistic Psychologist, 39(3), 222-235.
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolenscents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. B., & Darley, J. M. (2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 843-853.
Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., Anderson, C. L., McNeil, G. D., Loew, D., & Keltner, D. (2017). The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 310-328.
Guan, F., Chen, J., Chen, O., Liu, L., & Zha, Y. (2019). Awe and prosocial tendency. Current Psychology, 38(4), 1033-1041.
Halstead, J. M., & Halstead, A. O. (2004). Awe, tragedy and the human condition.International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 9(2), 163-175.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Jiang, L., Yin, J., Mei, D., Zhu, H., & Zhou, X. (2018). Awe weakens the desire for money.Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12, 12-21.
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297-314.
Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2015). Assessing whether practical wisdom and awe of God are associated with life satisfaction.Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(1), 51-59.
Krenzer, W. L. D., Krogh-Jespersen, S., Greenslit, J., Price, A., & Quinn, K. A. (2020). Assessing the experience of awe: Validating the Situational Awe Scale. College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations, 261. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/261
Li, J. J., Dou, K., Wang, Y. J., & Nie, Y. G. (2019). Why awe promotes prosocial behaviors? The mediating effects of future time perspective and self-transcendence meaning of life. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01140
Lin, R. M., Hong, Y. J., Xiao, H. W., & Lian, R. (2020). Dispositional awe and prosocial tendency: The mediating roles ofselftranscendent meaning in life and spiritual self-transcendence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(12), 1-10.
Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect.Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543-557.
Mogilner, C. (2010). The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection.Psychological Science, 21(9), 1348-1354.
Mogilner, C., & Aaker, J. (2009). “The time vs. money effect”: Shifting product attitudes and decisions through personal connection.Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 277-291.
Myers, M. W., Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2014). Perspective taking instructions and self-other overlap: Different motives for helping.Motivation and Emotion, 38(2), 224-234.
Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 883-899.
Prade, C., & Saroglou, V. (2016). Awe’s effects on generosity and helping.The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 522-530.
Rudd, M., Vohs, K. D., & Aaker, J. (2012). Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being.Psychological Science, 23(10), 1130-1136.
Sawada, K., & Nomura, M. (2022). Developing and validating the Japanese version of the situational Awecale (SAS-J). Current Psychology, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02808-6
Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2006). Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style.The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 61-71.
Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & Mossman, A. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept.Cognition and Emotion, 21(5), 944-963.
Schultz, P. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61-78). Springer, Boston, MA.
Stellar, J. E., Gordon, A. M., Piff, P. K., Cordaro, D., Anderson, C. L., Bai, Y., … Keltner, D. (2017). Self-transcendent emotions and their social functions: Compassion, gratitude, and awe bind us to others through prosociality.Emotion Review, 9(3), 200-207.
Tangney, J. P. (1990). Assessing individual differences in proneness to shame and guilt: Development of the Self-Conscious Affect and Attribution Inventory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 102-111.
Tesser, A., & Smith, J. (1980). Some effects of friendship and task relevance on helping: You don’t always help the one you like. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(6), 582-590.
VanCappellen, P., & Saroglou, V. (2012). Awe activates religious and spiritual feelings and behavioral intentions. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(3), 223-236.
Vohs, K. D., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2006). The psychological consequences of money.Science, 314(5802), 1154-1156.
Weger, U., & Wagemann, J. (2021). Towards a conceptual clarification of awe and wonder.Current Psychology, 40(3), 1386-1401.
Yaden, D. B., Kaufman, S. B., Hyde, E., Chirico, A., Gaggioli, A., Zhang, J. W., & Keltner, D. (2019). The development of the Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): A multifactorial measure for a complex emotion. The Journal of Positive Psychology,14(4), 474-488.
Yang, Y., Hu, J. & Nguyen, B. (2021). Awe, consumer conformity and social connectedness.Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(7), 893-908.
Zhao, H., & Zhang, H. (2022). Why dispositional awe promotes psychosocial flourishing? An investigation of intrapersonal and interpersonal pathways among Chinese emerging adults.Current Psychology, 42, 12682-12694.
Zhou, X., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money: Reminders of money alter social distress and physical pain.Psychological Science, 20(6), 700-706.
董蕊, 彭凯平, 喻丰. (2013). 积极情绪之敬畏.心理科学进展, 21(11), 1996-2005.
方圣杰, 闵昌运, 张林. (2014). 负面新闻报道对助人行为倾向的影响作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, (09), 1372-1374.
冯琳琳, 钟浩, 张乐琳. (2021). 大学生诱发情绪时情绪反应对状态共情与助人行为的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 29(7), 1085-1091.
寇彧, 洪慧芳, 谭晨, 李磊. (2007). 青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 112-117.
寇彧, 唐玲玲, 刘伟, 胡敏中. (2004). 心境对亲社会行为的影响. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, (5), 44-49.
康其丰. (2014).金钱助人与时间助人对幸福感的影响——社会联结的调节作用(博士学位论文). 暨南大学, 广州.
沈靓. (2020) “捐还是不捐?”——如何提高个体慈善捐助行为. 上海管理科学, 42(2), 110-115.
孙颖, 贾东丽, 蒋奖, 刘子双. (2020). 敬畏对亲环境行为意向的影响. 心理与行为研究, 18(3), 383-389.
汤明, 李伟强, 刘福会, 袁博. (2019). 内疚与亲社会行为的关系: 来自元分析的证据. 心理科学进展, 27(5), 773-788.
王贤. (2019). 敬畏感, 自大感对亲社会行为的影响 (硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
王雁菲. (2017).初中生父母教养方式、主观幸福感与助人行为的关系研究(博士学位论文). 曲阜师范大学.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展.心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
赵欢欢, 许燕, 张和云. (2019). 中国人敬畏特质的心理结构研究. 心理学探新, 39(4), 345-351.
钟毅平, 杨子鹿, 范伟. (2015). 自我-他人重叠对助人行为的影响:观点采择的调节作用.心理学报, 47(8), 1050-1057.
訾红岩, 何嘉梅. (2019). 自我-他人重叠及其相关概念辨析. 心理科学进展, 27(7), 1238-1247.
[1] 蔺姝玮, 孙炳海, 黄嘉昕, 肖威龙, 李伟健. 共情对广义互惠的影响：自我-他人重叠的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 475-484.
[2] 丁凤琴, 宋有明. 感恩与大学生助人行为:共情反应的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 289-296.
[3] 孙炳海, 苗德露, 李伟健, 张海形, 徐静逸. 大学生的观点采择与助人行为:群体关系与共情反应的不同作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(5): 491-497.
[4] 胡金生, 杨丽珠. 儿童移情指向性的发展及不同语言提示的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(3): 44-48.
[5] 廖凤林, 廖桂春, 李江雪, 吉英兰. 幼儿对不同被助对象的助人观念及其行为发展的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(1): 18-21.
[6] 张向葵, 盖笑松, 陈彩琦, 宋小冬. 当前社会形势下儿童──老年助人行为发展的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1996, 12(2): 6-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发