心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 617-624.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.05.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生中文独体字知觉加工效应

胡发稳1, 李应兵1, 李丽菊2   

  1. 1. 红河学院教师教育学院, 云南蒙自 661199;
    2. 红河学院数学与统计学院, 云南蒙自 661199
  • 发布日期:2023-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 李丽菊 E-mail:liliju@sohu.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区项目(72061012);云南省哲学社会科学规划教育学项目(AC21015);中国博士后科学基金第63批面上一等资助项目(2018M631108);云南省哲学社会科学研究基地课题(JD2017YB04)。

Perceptual Processing Effect of the Chinese Single Character for College Students

HU Fawen1, LI Yingbing1, LI Liju2   

  1. 1. College of Teacher Education, Honghe University, Yunnan Mengzi 661199;
    2. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Honghe University, Yunnan Mengzi 661199
  • Published:2023-09-11
  • Supported by:
    The project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1905301);National Natural Science Foundation of China (22078115,21776108,21690083,22008078).

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 采用Navon型复合刺激识别任务,考察中文独体字知觉加工的优先效应。结果表明:构形关系上独体字识别有笔画数效应,呈局部优先性,受练习、认知组块影响。定向关系中复合独体字识别呈整体优先性,慢于单体字和复合图的识别,不受笔画、局部性质影响,当局部构件有独立语义或构形意义时,优先效应反转,局部优先性增强。结论认为局部与整体构形优先关系,局部意义负载影响视知觉加工模式,独体字识别由局部和整体加工合力完成。

关键词: 独体字, 字识别, 整体优先, 知觉加工

Abstract: The present study investigated the perceptual precedence of Chinese single characters by using the recognition paradigm of Navon-type compound stimuli in college students. The results indicated that at the configural relationship level, the recognition of a single character appeared a significant stroke number effect, and the prior processing of local feature, which was influenced by the practice and cognitive chunking effects. But at the orientating relationship the recognition of compound single characters presented the global processing precedence, and was slower than both the recognition of monomer characters and compound geometrical shapes, which were not affected by both stroke number and local features. However, when the compound single characters' local components loaded certain independent semantic or configural meanings, this global precedence effect was reversed, while the local precedence was enhanced. In short, the pattern of visual perception mainly depended on the local and global configural precedence, as well as the local semantic information. Hence, the conjunction with global and local processing facilitated the recognition of the Chinese single characters.

Key words: single characters, word recognition, global precedence, perceptual processing

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Braisby, N., & Angus, G. (2005). Cognitive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 240-247.
Han, S., Humphreys, G. W., & Chen, L. (1999). Parallel and competitive processes in hierarchical analysis: Perceptual grouping and encoding of closure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1411-1432.
Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top-down”, “bottom-up”, or “middle-out”. Perception & Psychophysics, 25(2), 225-231.
Lasaga, M. I. (1989). Gestalts and their components: Nature of information-precedence. In S. Bryan,& E. S. Ballesteros(Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process(pp. 165-202). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353-383.
Perfect, T. J., Weston, N. J., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. (2008). The effects of precedence on Navon-induced processing bias in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(10), 1479-1486.
Plaisted, K., Swettenham, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 40(5), 733-742.
Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1977). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 23(3), 761-775.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136.
包广华, 黄民盼, 李怡莲, 陈柳君, 梁雨青. (2015). 复合汉字刺激心理旋转加工中的整体优先效应. 心理技术与应用, (4), 9-14.
常玉林, 王丹烁, 周蔚. (2016). 字形判断过程中的整体与局部优先效应: 来自反应时和眼动指标的证据. 心理科学, 39(5), 1040-1044.
陈兰, 翟细春, 周新林. (2009). 两位数的整体与局部加工. 心理学报, 41(5), 406-413.
丁锦红, 张钦, 郭春彦, 魏萍. (2014). 认知心理学(第2版). 中国人民大学出版社.
杜平, 张素文, 吴颖谦, 王天珍. (1999). 汉字视知觉的整体或局部优先效应的实验研究. 武汉汽车工业大学学报, (4), 23-26.
郭小朝. (2000). 汉字识别早期知觉过程中的整体优先效应. 心理科学, 23(5), 576-580.
韩世辉. (2000). 视觉信息加工中的整体优先性. 心理学报, 32(5), 337-347.
何华, 俞华华, 刘建平. (2015). 整体-局部条件下的数字加工研究. 心理学探新, 35(6), 499-501.
孔令跃, 张豹. (2020). 汉字亚词汇部件语音加工的P200效应. 心理与行为研究, 18(3), 304-310.
李寿欣, 蔺佳, 孙华. (2015). 不同认知方式个体在知觉和心理旋转加工过程中的整体优先效应. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 3(5), 76-84.
梁宁建. (2006). 心理学导论.上海教育出版社.
刘明慧, 张明, 隋洁. (2014). 自我信息对知觉选择中整体优先性的调控作用. 心理学报, 46(3), 312-320.
罗春荣, 纪桂萍, 房路江. (1987). 从汉字识别看视觉信息检测的整体优先性. 心理学报, (2), 184-189.
马利军, 韩镇洋. (2019). 整字-部件关系对等级汉字识别的影响研究. 心理与行为研究, 17(6), 756-764.
彭聃龄, 王春茂. (1997). 汉字加工的基本单元:来自笔画数效应和部件数效应的证据. 心理学报, (1), 9-17.
邱香, 傅小兰, 隋丹妮, 李健, 唐一源. (2009). 复合字母刺激心理旋转加工中的整体优先效应. 心理学报, 41(1), 1-9.
余成武, 张敏. (2014). 汉字单字识别的正字法加工方式. 杭州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 13(1), 29-34.
张积家. (1977). 知觉整体优先性的研究及其进展. 应用心理学, 3(1), 52-57.
张积家. (2007). 整体与部分的意义关系对汉字知觉的影响. 心理科学, (5), 1095-1098.
张玉静. (2013). 不同趋近动机强度的积极情绪对心理旋转整体优先效应的影响 (硕士学位论文). 首都师范大学,北京.
[1] 张学民, 鲁志鲲, 申继亮, 林崇德. 小学教师课堂信息表征对知觉加工能力影响的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(3): 42-45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发