Psychological Development and Education ›› 2002, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 55-59.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Influence of Primary Schoolers’ Field Independent Style and field Dependent Style on the Effects of Trial-teaching and Normal-teaching

LI Li-hong1, CHANG Fong-jin1   

  1. Department of Psychology Normal University, Changchun 130024
  • Online:2002-04-15 Published:2002-04-15

Abstract: This study compared the scores of students of field independent style and field dependent style who werefrom the fifth grade of primary school were effected by trial-teaching and normal-teaching in the solution of per centapplied-problem of three kinds of difficulty level.Multiple analysis of variance(MANOVA) indicated:(1) The maineffect of teaching method was significant;On the whole,the scores in trial-teaching were much higher than those ofnormal-teaching in the highest level tests.To the students of field dependent style,the scores difference between thetwo teaching method was nonsignificant in the lowest level tests;The scores in normal-teaching were much higherthan those of trial-teaching in the middle level tests,so the scores difference between the two teaching method teaching was significant;in the highest level tests,the scores in trial-teaching were much higher than those of normal-teaching,the scores difference between the two teaching method was significant.To the students of field dependentstyle,the scores between the two teaching method were nonsignificant in the lowest level tests;the scores in trialteaching were much higher than those of normal-teaching in the imddle and the highest level tests,so the scores difference between the two teaching method was significant.(2) On the whole,the boy's scores were much higherthan the girls'scores,so sex difference of scores was significant;sex difference of scores was nonsignificant in themiddle and the highest level tests.To the students of field dependent style,theboys'scores were much higher thanthe girls'scores in the highest level tests,so sex differences of scores was significant.(3) The main effect of cognitive styles was nonsignificant.

Key words: field dependent, field independent, cognitive styles, trial-teaching, normal-teaching

CLC Number: 

  • G441
[1] Witkin H A.,Goodenough D K.:CognifiveStyles:Essencex and Origins,1981.56-62.
[2] Richard J.Riding,On the Nature of Cognitive Style:Educational Psychology.1997,29-49.
[3] Sternberg R J.,Grigorenko E L.Are cognitive Style still in style? American Psychologist,1997,Vol 52,700-712.
[4] Ren Jianjun.Multistage magnitude estimate and gamma response law of the human perception during prolonged spatial rotation,2nd APA-MA Conference,Aug 23-25,1992,P34.
[5] 张必隐.场依存性对于程序教学与常规教学的效果的影响谢斯骏张厚粲.《认知方式-人格维度的实验研究》,北京师范大学出版社,1988年版,48-53.
[6] 张必隐.程序模式与认知方式之间的关系,心理科学通迅,1983,1,21-25.
[7] 邱学华.尝试教学课堂艺术,教育科学出版社,2000年版,1-20.
[8] 张厚粲等.认知方式的个体发展与性别,谢斯骏,张厚粲.《认知方式-人格维度的实验研究》,北京师范大学出版社,1988年版,83-87.
[9] 杨治良.认知风格的研究新近展,心理科学,2001,5,326-332.
[1] Han, Xiu, Pei-yang-hong. The Effects of the College Students’ Intelligence and Cognitive Styles on Implicit Sequence Learning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(1): 48-53.
[2] LI Shou-xin, SONG Yan-chun. Research on the Prospective Memory of Students with Different Cognitive Styles [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(2): 18-22.
[3] WU Guo-lai, WO Jian-zhong, BAI Xue-jun, SHEN De-li. The Difference of Implicit Sequence Learning in 11-year-old Children Between Cognitive Styles [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(1): 39-42.
[4] LI Shou-xin, CHEN Hong-min. Influence of Cognitive Styles and Subjects on Reading Transfer [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2002, 18(4): 52-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!