Psychological Development and Education ›› 2004, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 19-24.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study of Difference of Elementary second to fourth Graders’ Representation Strategy in Arithmetic Word Problem

CHEN Ying-he1, ZHONG Ning-ning1, TIAN Guo-sheng2, WANG Zhi-guo1   

  1. 1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. Staff Room of Langfang's Educational Department, Langfang 065000, China
  • Online:2004-10-15 Published:2004-10-15

Abstract: A word problem test was administered to 123 students from the second to fourth grade by experiment method and clinical interview method,in order to explore the difference of representation strategy between superior students and inferior students when they solved comparable word problem.The results showed that:(1)According to students'performance on consistent word problems and inconsistent word problems,most of superior students used problem-model strategy to represent word problem and most of inferior students used direct translation strategy to represent word problem;(2)With entering the higher grade,superior students used representation strategy more stably.As far as inferior students were concerned,more effective problem-model strategy didn't take the place of direct translation strategy,though the cognition about strategy utilization was increasing;(3)The difference of gender was insignificant,except that the accuracy of inferior female students was less than that of inferior male ones and that inferior female students reported to use direct translation strategy more than inferior male ones.

Key words: elementary student, arithmetic word problem, representation strategy

CLC Number: 

  • B844.1
[1] Siegler R S. Children's Thinking. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1998:150-167.
[2] Sternberg R J, Talia B Z. The Nature of Mathematical Thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996:27-79.
[3] Hegarty M, Mayer R E, Monk C A. Comprehension of Arithmetic Word Problem: A Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Problem Solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995, 87(1): 18-32.
[4] Hegarty M, Mayer R E, Green C E. Comprehension of Arithmetic Word Problems Evidence From Students'Eye Fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992, 84(1): 76-84.
[5] 陈英和,仲宁宁,耿柳娜.关于数学应用题心理表征策略的新理论.心理科学,2004,27(1):246-247.
[6] Maccoby E E, Jacklin C N. The psychology of sex differences.Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 1974.
[7] Hiebert J. Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986.
[8] Hiebert J, Wearne D. Instruction, Understanding, and Skill in Multidigit Addition and Subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 1996,14:251-283.
[9] Geary D C. Reflections of Evolution and Culture in Children's Cognition. American Psychologist, 1995, 50:24-37.
[10] Schoenfeld A H. Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., 1987.
[11] Gilat E, Irit P. Cognition and Metacognition: Evidence of Higher Thinking in Problem-solving of Adolescents with Mental Retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 2001, 36(1): 83-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!