Psychological Development and Education ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 65-72.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.01.08

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Emergence and Development of Orthographic Awareness in Chinese Preschool Children

LIU Yufei1,2, QIAN Yi3, SONG Yaowu4, BI Hongyan1,2   

  1. 1. Center for brain science and learning difficulties, CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. School of Humanities, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China;
    4. College of Education, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
  • Online:2018-01-15 Published:2018-01-15

Abstract: Studies have shown that the orthographic awareness plays an important role in the development of children's literacy. There are three levels in the orthographic system of Chinese characters:strokes, radicals and the whole characters. About the whole characters, a number of literatures reveal that pre-school children could tell the difference between the Chinese characters and those obviously different materials such as numbers, letters, scribbles and so on. The present study aims to investigate the awareness of the characters-specific of Chinese. We analyzed the performance of pre-school children when asked to distinguish Chinese characters from Korean, Japanese (hiragana) and Chinese characters, which are similar in shape. In terms of the radicals, some people think that pre-school children haven't developed the position awareness of radicals. Conversely, some people believe that pre-school children could realize the reasonable position of the radicals. We optimized the experimental design to make clear that whether it has been developed or not. Two studies were designed to investigate the orthographic awareness in Chinese preschool children. We recruited 102 preschool children, who fell into three age groups:4-year-olds, 5-year-olds and 6-year-olds, consisting of 31, 37 and 34 children respectively. Chinese characters, Korean and Japanese characters were used to investigate the specific awareness of Chinese characters. And we used pictophonetic words of up-down and left-right structures to make pseudo-characters and non-characters to investigate the position awareness of the radicals. Children were asked to decide which one was Chinese character. Results showed that children could tell the Japanese was not Chinese characters and at about the age of 5 the ability reached maturity. Children at the age of four could not tell the difference between Chinese and Korean and even for the 6-year-old children, the ability wasn't mature. The results revealed that judging Japanese was easier than Korean and the specific awareness of Chinese characters didn't develop very well at the preschool age. All groups of children could realize that the pseudo-characters conform to the rules of orthography while the ability of judging the non-characters didn't evolve in preschool. They couldn't tell the correct position of the radicals and meanwhile we found that six years old children were more likely to discriminate the non-characters of up-down structures.

Key words: preschool children, orthographic awareness, Chinese characters' specificity, radical position

Bialystok,E.(1995).Making concepts of print symbolic:Understanding how writing represents language. First Language, 15(45),317-338.

Chan L.(1990).Pre-school children's understanding of Chinese writing[D].London:University of London.

Cheng,C.K., & Huang,H.M.(1995).The acquisition of general lexical knowledge of Chinese characters in school children.In The 7th International Conference on the Cognitive Processing of Chinese and other Asian languages.Hong Kong:The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Ding, G. S., Peng, D. L., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese:A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530-539.

Geva, E., & Willows, D. (1994). Orthographic knowledge is orthographic knowledge is orthographic knowledge. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge, 1:Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 359-380). New York:Kluwer/Plenum.

Lavine,L.O.(1977).Differentiation of letterlike forms in prereading children. Developmental Psychology,13(2),89-94.

Levy,B.A.,Gong,Z.,Hessels,S.,Evans,M.A.,&Jared,D.(2006).Understanding print:Early reading development and the contributions of home literacy experiences.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,93(1),63-93.

Ouellette.G, & Sénéchal,M. (2008). Pathways to literacy:A study of invented spelling and its role in learning to read. Child Development, 79(4), 899-913.

Qian,Y.,Song,Y.W.,Zhao,J., &Bi,H.Y.(2015).The developmental trend of orthographic awareness in Chinese preschoolers.Reading and Writing,28(4),571-586.

Su,M.M.,Peyre,H.,Song,S.,McBride,C.,Tardif,T.,Li,H et al.(2017).The influence of early linguistic skills and family factors on literacy acquisition in Chinese children:Follow-up from age 3 to age 11.Learning and Instruction,49,54-63.

Taft, M., & Zhu, X. P. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 23(3), 761-775.

韩布新.(1994).汉字部件信息数据库的建立——部件和部件组合频率的统计分析.心理学报,26(2),147-152.

郝美玲.(2007).留学生汉字正字法意识的萌芽与发展.世界汉语教学,79(1),29-39.

胡永祥,陈敏,李荣宝.(2015).学龄前儿童文字形态意识发展中的跨文字体系一致性研究.基础教育,12(4),66-73.

李虹,彭虹,舒华.(2006).汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展.心理发展与教育,22(1),35-38.

李娟,傅小兰,林仲贤.(2000).学龄儿童汉语正字法意识发展的研究.心理学报,32(2),121-126.

李力红,刘宏艳,刘秀丽.(2005).汉字结构对汉字识别加工的影响.心理学探新,25(1),23-27.

刘宝根,周兢,高晓妹,李林慧.(2011).4-6岁幼儿图画书自主阅读过程中文字注视的眼动研究.心理科学,34(1),112-118.

刘鸣.(1996).汉字认知与形象思维.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),(4),46-51.

刘妮娜.(2012).学前儿童文字意识发展的研究(硕士学位论文).天津师范大学.

刘妮娜,仝文,闫国利.(2014).4~7岁儿童汉字正字法意识的发展.心理发展与教育,(5),457-465.

刘翔平,刘文理,张立娜,徐先金,张微,张秀秀,张婧乔.(2006).儿童识字能力与汉字规则意识关系研究.中国特殊教育,(1),56-61.

刘晓丽.(2013). 韩语汉字词与汉语词语的对比研究及在教学中的应用 (硕士学位论文).辽宁大学,沈阳

钱怡,赵婧,毕鸿燕.(2013).汉语学龄前儿童正字法意识的发展.心理学报, 45(1),60-69.

舒华.汉语儿童词汇和阅读获得的研究.见:彭聃龄(编),汉语认知研究(pp.279-295).济南:山东教育出版社,1997.

舒华,李文玲,辜玉旻,Anderson,伍新春,张厚粲,轩月.(2002).家庭文化背景在儿童阅读发展中的作用.心理科学,25(2),136-139.

邢红兵.现代汉字特征分析与计算研究.北京:商务印书馆,2007.

杨新忠.(2015).偶然与必然——汉字与周边民族文字形态相似性研究.设计艺术(山东工艺美术学院学报),(2),12-16.

杨新忠,李彩林,刘晴,胡卜文.(2015).汉字字体异域化风格设计的审美与表现.包装工程,36(2),118-122.

喻柏林,曹河圻.(1992). 汉字结构方式的认知研究.心理科学,(5),5-10.

喻柏林,冯玲,曹河圻,李文玲.(1990).汉字的视知觉——知觉任务效应和汉字属性效应.心理学报,(2),141-148.

曾捷英,喻柏林.(1999).速示重复和非速示呈现下的汉字结构方式效应.心理科学,22(4),305-309.

曾捷英,周新林,喻柏林.(2001).变形汉字的结构方式和笔画数效应.心理学报,33(3),204-208.

赵静,李甦.(2014).3-6岁儿童汉字字形认知的发展.心理科学,37(2),357-362.
[1] LENG Xinyi, SU Mengmeng, LI Wenling, YANG Xiujie, XING Ailing, ZHANG Xianglin, SHU Hua. The Relation between Home Environment and Early Language Development in Rural China [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[2] WANG Yingjie, LUAN Jinxin, LI Yan. The Relationship between Maternal Parenting Stress and Preschool Children's Anxiety: The Mediating Effect of Mother-child Conflict and the Moderating Effect of Maternal Mindfulness [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[3] WANG Ying, ZHU Haidong, ZHANG Xinyi, XIAO Yan. The Influence of Parent-child Attachment on the Executive Function of Left-behind Preschool Children: Grandparent-child Attachment as a Mediator and Moderator [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 195-206.
[4] ZHANG Guangzhen, LIANG Miao, LIANG Zongbao. A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Parenting Styles on Social Adjustment of Preschool Children: Mediating Effects of Self-control [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 800-807.
[5] WANG Wei, GONG Deying, CHENG Chun, CHEN Ke, LI Yongxin, YAN Jingjing. The Characteristics of Number Sense in 5~7 Years Old Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 818-825.
[6] ZHAN Shuwei, YANG Ning, ZHAO Bihua. Receptive Language Skills and Social Withdrawal among Chinese Left-behind Preschool Children: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 834-844.
[7] ZHANG Fan, ZHAO Demao, LIU Xia, BAI Rong, ZHANG Mingliang, XING Shufen. The Co-effect of Parental Negative Parenting Style and MAOA rs6323 Polymorphism on Externalizing Problem Behaviors of Preschool Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(6): 659-667.
[8] YU Xiao, WANG Hongmei, CHEN Yinghe, LIU Ruishu, HAN Congcong, HAN Min, ZHANG Han, LIU Jing. The Role of Distractor Inhibition and Relational Integration in Preschool Children's Analogical Reasoning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(4): 385-393.
[9] SHU Zeng, HE Qiong, LI Xiaomin, ZHANG Jing, ZHANG Yuehan, FANG Xiaoyi. Effect of Maternal Stress on Preschoolers' Creative Personality: The Mediating Role of Mothers' Parenting Styles [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(3): 276-284.
[10] NIU Yubai, SHI Ranran, CAO Xiancai. Preschool Children's Approximate Number System Acuity and Symbolic Number Abilities [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(2): 129-138.
[11] WANG Mingzhu, ZOU Hong, LI Xiaowei, ZHANG Wenjuan, WANG Yingqian, JIANG Suo. Marital Conflict and Preschool Children's Parenting Styles: The Moderating Role of Parental Emotion Regulation Strategies [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(3): 279-286.
[12] LIU Ni-na, TONG Wen, YAN Guo-li. The Development of Chinese Orthographic Awareness in Pre-school Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(5): 457-465.
[13] MA Feng-ling, TANG Yu-long, ZHENG Ting-ting, XU Fen. The Development of 3-to 5-Year-olds' Trust Judgment Based on Face [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(4): 337-344.
[14] XING Xue-wei, WU Xin-chun, HOU Jian-fang, LIU Chang, CHEN Ling-ling. The Relationship between Paternal Attitudes towards the Role of Father and Father Involvement: The Moderating Effect of Types of Maternal Attitudes [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(4): 387-395.
[15] LIU Ni-na, WANG Jing, HAN Ying-hong, XU Zhen-ping. The Effect of Three Different Reading Styles on the 2-3 year-old Children’s Attention to Print when Reading Picture Books:Evidence from the Eye Movement Data [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(1): 39-45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!