Psychological Development and Education ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 344-352.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Impact of Dynamic Information Presentation to Problem Finding

CHEN Li-jun1, ZHENG Xue2   

  1. 1. Educational school, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510665;
    2. Psychological school, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631
  • Online:2013-07-15 Published:2013-07-15

PDF (PC)

Abstract: In the way of many-round dynamic information presentation and one-round static information presentation, the characteristics of problem finding of 20 university students was compared between the conflict situation and the potential situation by means of thinking aloud. The influence of dynamic information presentation to the quantity, quality and area in problem finding, the correction condition of students after new information presented, and the evaluation of effects the new information were studied importantly. The research found out, the students were promoted to process information more meticulously and thoroughly in the dynamic information presentation than in the static information presentation, and they could find more quantitative and flexible problems. However, the links between information could be blocked in the dynamic information presentation, and it was not conducive to the interregional problems. In the way of two kinds of presentation, problems had different features in the area distribution. In the dynamic presentation, the problems distributed uniformly in each area, the problems appeared according to the round sequential, and matched with the new round information. But the characteristics of problems in the static presentation were contrary. After the presentation of new round information, the problems could be divided into five categories, which including new problems, change-direction problems, change-degree problems, consistent problems and connective problems. There were more relevant between new information and previous information in the potential situation. For the influence of new information, what the students mentioned most were the original evaluation and understanding more deeply. No effect was mentioned least. The influence was different according to the category of situation and the property of the new information.

Key words: problem finding, dynamic information presentation, static information presentation, many-round information, thinking aloud

CLC Number: 

  • B844.3
Arlin, P. K. (1976). A cognitive process model of problem finding. Educational Horizons, 54(2), 99-106.
Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 98-111.
Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning in education. In Mayer, M, Questions and Questioning. NY: Walter De Gruyter, 105.
Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York:Simon and Schuster Press, 95.
Gautier, C., & Solomon, R. (2005). A Preliminary Study of Students' Asking Quantitative Scientific Questions for Inquiry-Based Climate Model Experiments. Journal of Geo-science Education, 53(4),432-443.
Guilford, J. P.(1959). Three faces of intellect. American psychologist, 14(8), 469-479.
Hayes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.
Hoover, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1990). The scientific hypothesis formulation ability of gifted ninth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 838-848.
Hoover, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Scientific problem solving and problem finding: A theoretical model. In Runco, M. A. Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 201-219.
Jay, E. S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding the search for mechanism. In Runco, M. A. The creativity research handbook. NY: Hampton Press, 258-260.
Lee, H., & Cho, Y. (2007). Factors Affecting Problem Finding Depending on Degree of Structure of Problem Situation. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(2),113-125.
Marbach, A. G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 854-870.
Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357-364.
Mumford, M. D., Roni, R. P., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In Runco, M. A., Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 3-39.
Patrick, C. (1937) . Creative thought in artists. Journal of Psychology, 4, 35-73.
Ramirez, VE. (2002). Finding the Right Problem. Asia Pacific Education Review, 3(1),18-23.
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Robinson, E. J. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 43-47.
Sapp, D. D. (1995). Creative problem-solving in art: A model for idea inception and image development . Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(3),173-185.
Torrance, E. P. (1963). The Creative personality and the ideal pupil. Teachers College Record, 65, 220-226.
陈丽君. (2012). 问题发现研究:范式、困境与突破. 科技管理研究, 13, 257-262.
陈丽君, 郑雪. (2009). 大学生问题发现过程的表征层次研究.心理发展与教育, 3, 46-53.
陈丽君, 郑雪. (2011). 大学生问题发现过程的问题行为图研究. 心理发展与教育, 1, 35-43.
陈琦, 刘儒德. (2007). 当代教育心理学(第2版). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 333-340.
代天恩. (2011). 科学问题发现中的原型启发效应. 硕士学位论文. 西南大学, 20-30.
胡卫平, 周蓓. (2010). 动机对高一学生创造性的科学问题提出能力的影响. 心理发展与教育, 1, 31-36.
林崇德. (1999). 学习与发展. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 148-149.
林沂升. (2003). "科学问题发现"之思考模式诠释研究——以研究生与小学生的个案为例. 硕士学位论文. 台湾屏东师范学院, 39-43.
邵惠靖. (2001). 扩散性思考、数学问题发现与学业成就的关系. 硕士学位论文. 台湾政治大学, 163-164.
肖浩宇, 张庆林, 史慧颖. (2006). 小学儿童提问能力的发展. 心理发展与教育, 1, 58-62.
许育彰. (1999). 探讨高中生从力学情境中发现问题的能力之研究. 博士学位论文. 台湾师范大学, 47-49.
杨千慧. (2002). 当代女性地球科学家科学探索历程. 硕士学位论文.台湾师范大学, 22-24.
杨小洋, 申继亮, 崔艳丽. (2006). 学生提问与语文阅读理解能力的关系研究. 心理科学, 29(4), 806-810.
赵宏. (1988). 人的思维与创造. 北京: 解放军出版社, 34.
[1] LIU Chunhui, LIN Chongde. The Impact of Individual and Material Variables on Creative Problem Finding Ability [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(5): 513-521.
[2] CHEN Li-jun, ZHENG Xue. A Study on the Problem Behavior Graphs of University Students in the Problem Finding Process [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(1): 35-43.
[3] HU Wei-ping, ZHOU Bei. The Influences of Motivation on Creative Scientific Problem Finding Ability of First Year Students in High School [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(1): 31-36.
[4] CHEN Li-jun, ZHENG Xue. The Study of the Representation of Thinking in Problem-Finding Process of the Undergraduates [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(3): 46-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd