Psychological Development and Education ›› 2006, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 1-5.

    Next Articles

Exploring the Characteristics of Metamemory Monitoring of Children with Learning Disabilities

YU Guo-liang1, ZHANG Ya-ming2   

  1. 1. Research Center of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
    2. Faculty of Journalism & Communication, Hebei University, Baoding 071002
  • Online:2006-07-15 Published:2006-07-15

Abstract: Use 2×3×3 mixed design,this experimental study compared the level of metamemory of children with learning disabilities and average children under experimenter-paced time and judgment item by item conditions.The result showed that:Significant difference existed between learning disabled children and average children on JOK rating,rating of learning disabled children was lower than that of average children.No Significant difference was found on EOL and FOK rating between two groups.The level of prospective metamenmory monitor of learning disabled children was lower than that of compared group indicated by the correlations between the metamemory judgments and veracity of recall.

Key words: learning disabilities, metamemory, easy of learning, judgment of learning, feeling of knowing

CLC Number: 

  • B844
[1] Nelson T O,Narens L.Metamemory:a theoretical framework and new finding.In G Bower(ed.).The psychology of learning and motivation:advance in research and theory.New York:Academic press,1990.Vol.26.125-173.
[2] Nelson T O,Narens L.Why investigates metacognition? In J Metcalfe,A P Shimamura(eds.).Metacongnition:knowing about knowing.Cambridge:MIT Press,1994.1-25.
[3] Swanson H L.Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving.Journal of Educational Psychology,1990,82:306-314.
[4] Paris S G,Cross D R,Lipson M Y.Informed strategies for learning:A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,1984,76:1239-1252.
[5] Huet N,Marine C.Metamemory assessment and memory behavior in a simulated memory professional task.Contemporary Educational Psychology,1997,22:507-520.
[6] Schneider W.The role of conceptual knowledge and metamomory in the development of organizational processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Children psychology.1986,42:218-236.
[7] Schneider W.Performance prediction in young children:effect of skill,metacognition and wishful thinking.Development science,1998,1:291-297.
[8] Cunningham J G,Weaver S L.Young children's knowledge of their memory span:effect of task and experience.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1989,48:32-44.
[9] Schneider W,Vise M,Lockl K,et al.Developmental trends in children's memory monitoring:evidence from a judgment of learning task.Cognitive Development,2000,15:115-134.
[10] Pressley M,Levin J R,Ghatala E S,et al.Testing monitoring in young children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1987,43:96-111.
[11] Wellman H M.Preschoolers' understanding of memory-relevant variables.Child Development,1977,48:1720-1723.
[12] Zabrucky K,Ratner H H.Children's comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent story.Child Development,1986,57:1401-1418.
[13] Torgeson J K,Murphy H A,Ivey C.The influence of an orienting task on the memory performance of children with reading problems.Journal of Learning Disabilities,1979,12:396-401.
[14] Gaultney.Utilization deficiencies among children with learning disabilities.Learning and Individual Differences.1998,10(1):13-28.
[15] Greene G A.Comparison of learning disability subtypes on independent and concurrent measures of metamory.In Dissertation Abstracts International:Section B:The Sciences and Engineering.2001 Apr,61(9-B):5027.
[16] 周楚,刘晓明,张明.学习困难儿童的元记忆监测与控制特点.心理学报,2004,36(1):65-70.
[17] 刘希平.回溯性监测判断与预见性监测判断发展的比较研究.心理学报,2001,33(2):137-141.
[1] CONG Peiyao, JIA Ning. The Separation between Easy of Learning and Judgment of Learning in Metacognitive Monitoring: Evidence from Behavioral Performance and Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 522-531.
[2] XIANG Ling, FAN Shuxian, CHEN Jiali, WANG Baoxi. A Study on the Characteristics of Cognitive Control of Adolescent with Learning Disabilities [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(4): 410-416.
[3] JIANG Ying-jie, YANG Ling, YAN Yan. The Influence of Learning Times and Material Difficulty on Judgment of Learning’s Absolute Accuracy [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(6): 625-630.
[4] JIA Ning, DAI Jing-hua. Judgments of Learning of The Higher Graders in Elementary School: Absolute Accuracy and the Foresight Bias [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(1): 54-60.
[5] WANG En-guo, SHEN De-li, LV Yong, HU Wei, LI Yong-xin, CHEN Hai-xia. Chinese Language Learning Disabilities in the ERP Study Memory Encoding [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(2): 164-173.
[6] GE Cao, SHEN De-li, BAI Xue-jun. A Comparative Study on the Synergistic Learning of Implicit and Explicit Between Excellent Students and Students with Learning Disabilities [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(1): 79-82,91.
[7] WANG En-guo, LIU Chang. Working Memory and Processing Speed in Children with Chinese Learning Disabilities [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(1): 94-100.
[8] XING Shu-fen, LIN Chong-de, YU Guo-liang. A Study on the Characteristics of Social Comparison Among Children With Learning Disabilities [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(2): 36-39.
[9] WU Yan, SUI Guang-yuan. Eye Movements Performance Under Endogenous and Exogenous Cue In Learning Disabilities [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(1): 23-28.
[10] LI Wei-jian. An Experimental Study on the Debugging Strategies in Reading Comprehension of the Students With Learning Disabilities [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2004, 20(3): 81-85.
[11] LIU Yan, ZHANG Ming, XU Guo-qing. A Comparative Experimental Study on Delay of Gratification between Excellent Learning Students and Students with Learning Disabilities [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2002, 17(3): 63-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!