心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 76-81.

• 教与学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学教师课堂信息加工能力的研究

张学民, 申继亮, 林崇德   

  1. 北京师范大学心理学院, 发展心理研究所, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京, 100875
  • 出版日期:2007-01-15 发布日期:2007-01-15
  • 作者简介:张学民(1969- ),男,吉林人,北京师范大学心理学院,博士,副教授,E-mail:xmzhng@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    应用实验心理北京市重点实验室2005年度规划项目资助;普通高等院校人文社科重点研究基地项目资助

Studies on Classroom Information Processing of Primary School Teachers

ZHANG Xue-min, SHEN Ji-liang, LIN Chong-de   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;(2.State Key Lab of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. Institute of Development Psychology, Beijing Normal
  • Online:2007-01-15 Published:2007-01-15

摘要: 研究采用小学语文和数学教学录像为实验材料,以98名小学语文数学教师、其他学科教师和非教师为研究对象,运用反应时测量法探讨小学教师加工不同类型课堂信息的速度和辨别能力。结果表明:有学科教学经验的教师(语文和数学教师)在重视学科教学内容的同时,也重视课堂教学活动的组织和课堂气氛的调节;学科知识、学科教学经验和课堂教学经验对教师的课堂信息加工能力和教学专长发展有显著的影响;研究结论对提高教师课堂教学能力、教学专长以及教师培训提供了有力的实验证据。

关键词: 小学教师, 学科内容信息, 课堂活动信息, 课堂背景信息

Abstract: The present study was intended to research classroom information processing of primary school teachers in Chinese Language,mathematics,sciences and social sciences and non-teachers by reaction time paradigm.The experiment recorded response time and correct rate as the indicators of teachers response to different type classroom information.The results showed that teachers with subject teaching experience both focused subject content information and classroom activitiy information.Subject knowledge,subject teaching experience and classroom teaching experience played an important role in promoting teachers abilities in classroom information processing and developing teachers expertise.

Key words: primary school teachers, subject knowledge information, classroom activity and organization information, classroom background information

中图分类号: 

  • G443
[1] David C.Berliner.Memory for teaching as a function of expertise.Paper presented at meetings of the American Educational Research Association,New Orleans,LA[M],1988,(Presentation on ERA).
[2] David C.Berliner,Describing the Behavior and Documenting the Accomplishments of Expert Teachers,Bulletin of Science Technology Society[J],2004; 24:200-212.
[3] David C.Berliner.Expertise:The Wonder Of Exemplary Performances,Creating Powerful Thinking In Teachers And Students,Edited by John N.Mangieri,etal,Rinehart & Winston[M],1994,161-186.
[4] David C.Berliner,The Near Impossibility Of Testing For Teacher Quality,Journal Of Teacher Education[J],Vol.56,No.3,May/June 2005205-213.
[5] Dreyfus H L,Dreyfus S E.Mind Over Machine.New York:Free Press[M],1986,1-50.
[6] Robert G.Powell And Dana Caseau,Classroom Communication and Diversity.London Thousand Oaks,a) CA and New Delhi[J],2005,16(5):749-758.
[7] Nicholas Athanassiou,Jeanne M.Mcnett,Carol Harvey,Critical Thinking In The Management Classroom:Bloom'S Taxonomy As A Learning Tool,Journal Of Management Education[J],2003,27(5),533-555.
[8] Henrietta Dombey,Between Teachers,Children And Texts In Three Primary Classrooms In England,Journal Of Early Childhood Literacy[J],2003,3(1),37-58.
[9] 张学民,鲁志鲲,申继亮,林崇德.小学教师课堂信息表征对知觉加工能力影响的研究.心理发展与教育[J],2004,20(3),42~46.
[10] 张学民,申继亮,林崇德.国外教师知觉能力研究述评.比较教育研究[J],2004,25(5),1-6.
[11] 张学民,申继亮,林崇德.国外教师教学专长研究方法述评外国教育研究[J],2004,31(7),54-57.
[12] Anderson,J.R..Automaticity and the ACT Theory.American Journal of Psychology,1992,105(2),165-180.
[13] 林崇德,申继亮,辛涛.论教师教学监控能力提高的方法和途径.北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)[J],1998,135(1),36-42.
[14] 辛涛,申继亮,林崇德.任务指向型干预手段对教师教学监控能力的影响.心理科学,2000,23(2),129-132.
[15] 俞国良,辛自强,汤鉴澄,俞晓东.中小学教师教学监控能力:发展特点与相关因素.心理发展与教育[J],1998,14(2),31-35.
[16] Carter K,Sabers D,Cushing K,Pinnegar P,Berliner D C.Processing and using information about students:A study of expert,novice and postulant teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education[J],1987,3,147-157.
[17] Carter K,Cushing K,Sabers D,Stein P,Berliner D C.Expertnovice differences in perceiving and processing visual information.Journal of Teacher Education[J],1988,39(3),25-31.
[18] Christopher Day,Developing Teachers:The Challenges Of Lifelong Learning,International Conference "Promising Practice" In Teacher Education For The 21st Century2000[M].Beijing,May.14-20,2000(Presentation).
[19] Sabers D,Cushing K,Berliner D C.Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity,multidimensionality and immediacy.American Educational Research Journal[J],1991,28,63-88.
[20] Sternberg,Robert J.& Hovath J A.专家型教师教学专长的原型观.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)[J],1997,15(1),27-37.
[21] Sternberg R J.Ability Are Forms of Developing Expertise.Educational Research[J],1998,27(3),11-20.
[22] Sternberg R J.Intelligence as Developing Expertise,Contemporary educational psychology[J].1999,24 (4),359-376.
[23] 张学民,林崇德,申继亮.小学语文和数学教师课堂信息加工能力的研究,心理科学[J],2006,(已接收,In Press).
[1] 邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 121-131.
[2] 林颐宣. 主动性人格对小学教师工作满意度的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 103-112.
[3] 郑建君, 付晓洁. 利他动机对中小学教师知识共享的影响——组织认同和组织支持感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 421-429.
[4] 连坤予, 谢姗姗, 林荣茂. 中小学教师职业人格与主观幸福感的关系:工作投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 700-707.
[5] 李明军, 王振宏, 刘亚. 中小学教师工作家庭冲突与职业倦怠的关系:自我决定动机的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 368-376.
[6] 张西超, 胡婧, 宋继东, 张红川, 张巍. 小学教师心理资本与主观幸福感的关系:职业压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 200-207.
[7] 侯志瑾, 周宵, 陈杰灵, 朱莉, 倪竞, 陈淑芳. 中小学教师PTSD和PTG的影响因素研究:灾难前-中-后的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 82-89.
[8] 陈杰灵, 伍新春, 曾盼盼, 周宵, 熊国钰. PTSD与PTG的关系:来自教师群体的追踪研究证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 75-81.
[9] 彭文波, 刘电芝. 中小学教师工作满意度与教学动机的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 611-617.
[10] 王金良, 张大均. 中小学教师心理授权的测量[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 105-111.
[11] 李琼, 张国礼, 周钧. 中小学教师的职业压力源研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 97-104.
[12] 惠善康, 曹健. 中小学教师职业生涯高原现象的特征及相关因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 527-533,560.
[13] 张景焕, 刘翠翠, 金盛华, 吴琳娜, 林崇德. 小学教师的创造力培养观与创造性教学行为的关系:教学监控能力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 54-58.
[14] 吴明霞, 张大均, 陈旭, 余林, 郭成. 中小学教师工作-家庭冲突的测量[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 120-127.
[15] 郑红渠, 张庆林. 中小学教师心理健康维度的初步构建[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 95-100.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!