心理发展与教育 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 79-82,91.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

学优生与学困生内隐与外显协同学习的比较研究

葛操1, 沈德立2, 白学军2   

  1. 1. 郑州大学教育学院, 郑州450001;
    2. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津300074
  • 出版日期:2009-01-15 发布日期:2009-01-15
  • 作者简介:葛操,男,郑州大学教育学院心理学系副教授,博士.E-mail:chaoge101@zzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-04-0246);河南省教育科学“十一五”规划重点项目(2008-JKGHAZD-166)

A Comparative Study on the Synergistic Learning of Implicit and Explicit Between Excellent Students and Students with Learning Disabilities

GE Cao1, SHEN De-li2, BAI Xue-jun2   

  1. 1. School of Education, Zhengzhou university, Zhengzhou 450001;
    2. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal university, Tianjin 300074
  • Online:2009-01-15 Published:2009-01-15

摘要: 根据目前国内采用的标准,选取学优生和学困生各120人。运用内隐学习中的双条件人工语法材料和强分离的实验范式,考察和比较了两种学生的内隐学习、内隐与外显协同学习的成绩。结果显示:(1)学优生在外显学习、协同学习(先内隐后外显以及内隐与外显交替)方式下的成绩显著好于学困生,而在内隐学习方式下,二者成绩差异不显著。(2)学优生的外显学习及协同学习成绩显著好于内隐学习成绩,而学困生在四种学习方式下成绩差异不显著。表明在人工语法学习中学优生的有意识学习及其与无意识的协同学习效果较好,而学困生的有意识学习及协同学习较差。

关键词: 学优生, 学困生, 内隐学习, 外显学习, 协同学习

Abstract: According to the current standard,120 excellent students and 120 students with learning disabilities were selected.Bi-conditional artificial grammar letter strings and match-edit task paradigms in implicit learning research was used,this two kinds of students'implicit learning as well as the synergistic learning of implicit and explicit manipulation was to be compared.The results were as follows:(1)There was no significant difference in implicit learning performance between excellent students and students with learning disabilities.Performance of excellent students in explicit learning, the synergistic learning of implicit and explicit(first learn in implicit learning and then the explicit learning as well as the alternate learning)was significantly better than that of students with learning disabilities.(2)Scores of excellent students in explicit learning,and in the synergistic learning of implicit and explicit were significantly higher than the scores of implicit learning.There was no significant difference between the performances of students with learning disabilities among four kinds of learning styles.These results suggested that effect of conscious learning and its synergistic learning with unconscious learning for excellent students was better than unconscious learning,whereas effect of conscious learning and its synergistic learning with unconscious learning for the students with learning disabilities had no significant difference with unconscious learning.

Key words: excellent students, students with learning disabilities, implicit learning, explicit learning, synergistic learning of implicit and explicit

中图分类号: 

  • G442
[1] Mathews R C,Buss R R,Stanley W B,et al.Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples:A synergistic effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1989,15(6): 1083-1100.
[2] Mathews R C.Is research painting a biased picture of implicit learning?The dangers of methodological purity in scientific debate. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,1997,4(1):38-42.
[3] 郭秀艳.内隐学习与外显学习关系评述.心理科学进展, 2004,12(2):185-192.
[4] Destrebeeqz A,Cleeremans A.Temporal effets in sequene learning.In Jimenez L.(Ed.)Attention and Implicit Learning,John Benjamins,2003:181-213.
[5] 郭秀艳,杨治良.内隐学习和外显学习的相互关系.心理学报,2002,34(4):351-356.
[6] Reber A S,Walkenfeld F F,Hernstadt R.Implicit and explicit learning-individual difference and IQ.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1991,17(5):888-896.
[7] 高湘萍,徐欣颖,李慧渊.儿童绘图作业内隐学习智力独立性研究.心理科学,2005,28(4):863-867.
[8] 吴国来.内隐序列学习的发展研究.天津师范大学博士论文,2004.
[9] 钟启泉.差生的心理与教育.上海教育出版社,2003:10-13.
[10] 沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究.心理科学, 2006,29(1):2-6.
[1] 杨海波, 董良, 周婉茹. 人工语法学习中习得知识的分离:基于信号检测论和结构知识的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 10-16.
[2] 卢张龙, 吕勇, 沈德立. 内隐序列学习与注意负荷关系的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 561-568.
[3] 韩秀, 裴燕红. 大学生智力与认知风格对内隐序列学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 48-53.
[4] 张英萍. 内隐学习理论的新进展及其对专长研究的启示[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(1): 109-112.
[5] 郭秀艳. 内隐学习对技能类教学的启示[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(1): 87-91.
[6] 郭秀艳, 杨治良. 内隐学习的研究历程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 17(3): 85-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!