不同自尊者在赌博情境下的风险规避行为

心理发展与教育 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 61-65.

不同自尊者在赌博情境下的风险规避行为

杨娟^1,2, 张庆林^1,2

1. 西南大学心理学院, 重庆400715;
2. 教育部认知与人格重点实验室, 重庆400715

出版日期:2009-01-15 发布日期:2009-01-15
作者简介:杨娟,西南大学心理学院2006级博士生.E-mail:valleyqq@swu.edu.cn
基金资助:
西南大学国家重点学科基础心理学科研基金资助项目(NSKD06002)

The Risk Aversion in Gamblers with Different Self-Esteem

YANG Juan^1,2, ZHANG Qing-lin^1,2

1. Department of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
2. Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715

Online:2009-01-15 Published:2009-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了考察不同自尊水平的个体在赌博情境下的风险规避行为,263名大学生被试同时完成外显Rosenberg量表、内隐联想测验和21点赌博游戏。实验结果发现,(1)随着风险的增加,所有被试都表现出风险规避;(2)在高外显自尊水平的个体中,低内隐自尊水平个体比高内隐自尊水平个体表现出更多的风险规避行为;在低内隐自尊的个体中,高外显自尊个体比低外显自尊个体表现出更多的风险规避行为。风险规避行为间接地反映出个体的防御倾向,结果提示,在风险情境中,高外显低内隐自尊个体表现出较高的自我防御倾向。

关键词: 高自尊异质性, 防御性反应, 风险规避

Abstract: In order to explore the risk aversion in gamblers with different self-esteem,263 college students finished the Rosenberg self-esteem scale,the implicit association test and played blackjack 140 times.The results were as follows: (1)In the blackjack game,all the participants were inclined to avert the high risk.(2)Among the high explicit self-esteem participants,people with lower implicit self-esteem were more likely to avert the risk.Among the low implicit self-esteem participants,people with higher explicit self-esteem were more likely to avert the risk.Risk aversion reflected people's ego-defense mechanism,therefore,these results displayed that people with higher explicit and lower implicit had ego-defense strategies.

Key words: heterogeneity of high self-esteem, defensive, risk aversion

中图分类号:

B844.2

杨娟, 张庆林. 不同自尊者在赌博情境下的风险规避行为[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 61-65.

YANG Juan, ZHANG Qing-lin. The Risk Aversion in Gamblers with Different Self-Esteem[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(1): 61-65.

参考文献

[1] Ihilecich D,Gleser D.Defense mechanisms:their classification, correlates,and measurement with the defense mechanisms inventory. Owosso,MI:dmiassociates,1986
[2] 陈勃.自我的防御和应对:弗洛依德理论与皮亚杰理论的联合点.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1999,155(5):67-72
[3] 董妍,俞国良.自我提升的研究现状与展望.心理科学进展,2005,13(2):178-185
[4] 乔纳森,布朗著.陈浩莺,薛贵,曾盼盼译.自我.北京:人民邮电出版社,2004
[5] Baumeister R F,Smart L,Boden J M.Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression:The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review,1996,103:5-339
[6] Dodgson P G,Wood J V.Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure.Journal of Personality and social Psychology,1998,75:178-197
[7] Dunning D.The zealous self-aff irmer:How and why the self lurks so pervasively behind social judgment.In S.J.Spence,S.Fein,&M.P. Zanna(Eds.),Motivated social perception:The Ontario Symposium Vol.9: Ontario Symposium on personal and social psychology(pp.45-72).2003 Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.
[8] Vohs K D,Heatherton T F.Self-esteem and threats to self: Implications for self-construals and interpersonal perceptions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001,81:1103-1118
[9] 田录梅,张向葵.高自尊的异质性研究述评.心理科学进展,2006,14(5):704-709
[10] Kernis M H.Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry,2003,14(1):1-26
[11] Bosson J K,Brown,P P,Zeigler-Hill V,et al.Self-enhancement tendencies among people with high explicit self-esteem:The moderating role of implicit self-esteem.Self and Identity,2003,2:169-187
[12] McGregor I,Marigold D C.Defensive zeal and the uncertain self: What makes you so sure?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003, 85:338-852
[13] 周帆,王登峰.人格特质与外显自尊和内隐自尊的关系.心理学报,2005,37(1):100-105
[14] 蔡华俭.Greenwald提出的内隐联想测验介绍.心理科学进展,2003,11(3):339-344
[15] Y ang J,Li H,Zhang Y,Qiu J,Zhang Q L.The neural basis of risky decision-making in a backjack task.Neuro Report,2007,18:1507-1510
[16] Greenwald A G,Nosek B A,Banaji M R.Underst anding and using the implicit association test:I An improved scoring algorithm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003,85(2):197-216
[17] Heimpel S A,Wood J V,Marshall M A,Brown J D.Do people with low self-esteem really want to feel better?Self-esteem difference in motivation to repair negative moods.Journal of Personality and social Psychology,2002,82:128-147

相关文章 15

[1]	王帆, 方晓义, 胡伟, 陈海德, 吴梦希, 唐芹. 家庭环境与高中生发展:自主的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 585-593.
[2]	鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 王艳辉, 孙文强, 赵力燕. 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力：子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 482-495.
[3]	孙鹏, 邹泓, 杜瑶琳. 青少年创造性思维的特点及其对日常创造性行为的影响：人格的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 355-362.
[4]	张光珍, 梁宗保, 邓慧华, 陆祖宏. 学校氛围与青少年学校适应：一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 371-379.
[5]	赖雪芬, 张卫, 鲍振宙, 王艳辉, 熊庆龙. 父母心理控制与青少年抑郁的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 293-302.
[6]	宋静静, 李董平, 谷传华, 赵力燕, 鲍振宙, 王艳辉. 父母控制与青少年问题性网络使用：越轨同伴交往的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 303-311.
[7]	侯珂, 邹泓, 刘艳, 金灿灿, 蒋索. 同伴团体对青少年问题行为的影响：一项基于社会网络分析的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 259-267.
[8]	郭海英, 朱婉灵, 朱倩, 朱茂玲, 左培颖, 林丹华. 亲子沟通与农村青少年幸福感的关系：基本心理需要满足的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 129-136.
[9]	邓林园, 武永新, 孔荣, 方晓义. 冲动性人格、亲子沟通对青少年网络成瘾的交互作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 169-176.
[10]	胡阳, 范翠英, 张凤娟, 谢笑春, 郝恩河. 青少年网络受欺负与抑郁：压力感与网络社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 177-184.
[11]	苑春永, 邵爱惠, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 青少年儿童不爱社交、同伴排斥和同伴侵害的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 16-23.
[12]	戴艳, 雷鸣, 周宵, 姚梅, 蒋林洁, 陈希, 刘瑶. 创伤暴露程度对中学生创伤后应激障碍的影响：复原力的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 61-67.
[13]	周宵, 安媛媛, 伍新春, 陈和琼, 龙超敏. 汶川地震三年半后中学生的感恩对创伤后成长的影响：社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 68-74.
[14]	叶宝娟, 刘建平, 杨强. 感觉寻求对工读生病理性网络使用的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 96-104.
[15]	张景焕, 满达呼, 刘桂荣, 张舜, 窦菲菲, 林崇德. 父母教养方式对小学高年级学生社会创造力的影响：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 595-603.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed