大学生文化取向内隐效应的实验研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分别采用自陈式量表和内隐联想测验(IAT)对424名大学生外显文化取向与内隐文化取向状况及其关系进行研究。结果表明,大学生的外显文化取向以水平个人主义文化取向为主;在IAT测验中,集体主义信息和积极性词汇联结的平均反应时小于其和消极性词汇联结的平均反应时,且差异显著,表明大学生的集体主义文化取向;内隐文化取向的IAT测验与外显文化取向的自陈式量表所测结果之间无显著性相关;不同性别、父母不同文化程度的被试的内隐文化取向无显著性差异,但在外显文化取向上发现有显著差异。

关键词: 个人主义, 集体主义, 外显文化取向, 内隐文化取向

Abstract: To explore the implicit cultural orientation and its relationship with explicit cultural orientation,the Lmplicit Association Test (LAT) and scales about individualism and collect ivism were used to measure the implicit and explicit cultural orientation of 424 undergraduates.The results showed that:1) The undergraduates major explicit cultural orientation was horizontal individualism.2) The mean reaction time connected between collectivistic information and positive words were significantly smaller than that between collectivistic information and passive words in IAT,the undergraduates major implicit cultural orientation was collect ivism.3) There was not significant correlation between the results from IAT and scale scores on cultural orientation.4) The sexual and parents educat ional level differences were not found in terms of the IAT on implicit cultural orientation,but which were found in explicit cultural orientation.

Key words: individualism, collectivism, explicit cultural orientation, implicit cultural orientation

中图分类号:

B844.2

周丽清, 孙山. 大学生文化取向内隐效应的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(2): 55-60.

ZHOU Li-qing, SUN Shan. An Experimental Research on Implicit and Explicit Cultural Orientation of Undergraduates[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(2): 55-60.

参考文献

[1] Geert H.Culture's consequences:International differences in work relates values.Beverly Hill,CA:Sage,1984.
[2] K agitcibasi C,Berry J W.Cross-cultural psychology:Current research and trends.Annual Review of Psychology,1989,40:493-531.
[3] Triandis H C.Individualism and coll ectivism.Boulder,CO:Westview Press,1995.
[4] Cloninger S C.Personality:Description,dynamics and development.New York:W.H.Free-man and Company,1996.
[5] Triandis H C,Chen X P,Chan D K-S.Scenarios for the measurement of collectivism and individualism.Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology,1998,29:275-289.
[6] St ar Soh,Leong F T L.Validity of vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism in Singapore.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2002,33:3-15.
[7] Nelson M R,Shavitt S.Horizontal and vertical individualism and achievement values:A multimethod examinat ion of Denmark and the United States.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2002,33:439-458.
[8] Gouveia V V,Clemente M,Espinosa P.The horizontal and vertical attributes of individualism and collectivism in a Spanish population.J Soc Psychol.2003,143(1):43-63.
[9] Oppenheimer L.Perception of individualism and collectivism in Dut chsociety:A develop-mental approach.International Journal of Behavioral development,2004,28(4):339-346.
[10] 王永丽,时勘,黄旭.个人主义与集体主义结构的验证性研究.心理科学,2003,26(6):996-999.
[11] 黄任之,姚树桥,邹涛.个人主义和集体主义量表中文版信度和效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2004,14(6):564-565.
[12] Greenwald A G,M cGhee E,Schwartz J L K.Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:The implicit association test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74(5):181-198.
[13] 李炳全.文化心理学.上海:上海教育出版社,2007.
[14] 邱林,郑雪.个体文化取向与主观幸福感关系的跨文化研究.中国健康心理学杂志,2006,14(3):241-244.
[15] 李祚山.大学生文化取向与心理健康的关系研究.中国健康心理学杂志,2006,14(3):291-294.
[16] Triandis H C,Gelfand M J.Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74:118-128.
[17] 蔡华俭.内隐自尊的作用机制及特性研究.上海:华东师范大学,2002.
[18] 叶浩生.文化模式对心理和行为的影响.心理科学,2004,27(5):1032-1037.
[19] Farnham S D,Greenwald A G,Banaji M R.Implicit self-esteem.In:Abrams,Dominic,Hogg,Michael A ed.Social Identity and Social Cognition.Blackwell Publishers Inc,1999.
[20] Wilon T D,Lindsey S,Schooler T Y.A model of dualattitude.Psychological Review,2000,107(1):101-126.

相关文章 15

[1]	王帆, 方晓义, 胡伟, 陈海德, 吴梦希, 唐芹. 家庭环境与高中生发展:自主的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 585-593.
[2]	鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 王艳辉, 孙文强, 赵力燕. 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力：子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 482-495.
[3]	孙鹏, 邹泓, 杜瑶琳. 青少年创造性思维的特点及其对日常创造性行为的影响：人格的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 355-362.
[4]	张光珍, 梁宗保, 邓慧华, 陆祖宏. 学校氛围与青少年学校适应：一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 371-379.
[5]	赖雪芬, 张卫, 鲍振宙, 王艳辉, 熊庆龙. 父母心理控制与青少年抑郁的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 293-302.
[6]	宋静静, 李董平, 谷传华, 赵力燕, 鲍振宙, 王艳辉. 父母控制与青少年问题性网络使用：越轨同伴交往的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 303-311.
[7]	侯珂, 邹泓, 刘艳, 金灿灿, 蒋索. 同伴团体对青少年问题行为的影响：一项基于社会网络分析的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 259-267.
[8]	郭海英, 朱婉灵, 朱倩, 朱茂玲, 左培颖, 林丹华. 亲子沟通与农村青少年幸福感的关系：基本心理需要满足的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 129-136.
[9]	邓林园, 武永新, 孔荣, 方晓义. 冲动性人格、亲子沟通对青少年网络成瘾的交互作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 169-176.
[10]	胡阳, 范翠英, 张凤娟, 谢笑春, 郝恩河. 青少年网络受欺负与抑郁：压力感与网络社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 177-184.
[11]	苑春永, 邵爱惠, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 青少年儿童不爱社交、同伴排斥和同伴侵害的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 16-23.
[12]	戴艳, 雷鸣, 周宵, 姚梅, 蒋林洁, 陈希, 刘瑶. 创伤暴露程度对中学生创伤后应激障碍的影响：复原力的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 61-67.
[13]	周宵, 安媛媛, 伍新春, 陈和琼, 龙超敏. 汶川地震三年半后中学生的感恩对创伤后成长的影响：社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 68-74.
[14]	叶宝娟, 刘建平, 杨强. 感觉寻求对工读生病理性网络使用的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 96-104.
[15]	张景焕, 满达呼, 刘桂荣, 张舜, 窦菲菲, 林崇德. 父母教养方式对小学高年级学生社会创造力的影响：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 595-603.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed