高校学生道德困境研究:日常德性的视角

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以45位本科生和硕士研究生为对象, 采用日常德性的视角, 考察高校学生在日常生活中亲历的道德困境, 重点探讨个人日常道德困境的内容, 以及他们对个人日常道德困境的解读和处理。结果表明(1)个人日常道德困境多数不同于假设性的公正取向的道德困境。人们对各类个人日常道德困境的解读和阐释存在个体差异。道德内容主要取决于人们所强调的问题。(2)人们所主张的有助于处理日常道德困境的策略与他们在生活中实际采用的策略是有差异的。在真实的道德选择和决定中, 会有更多利己和实用的考虑。此外, 人们对道德行为的判断多倚重对行为后果(特别是伤害性后果)的考虑。

关键词: 日常道德困境, 日常德性, 道德领域, 道德功能

Abstract: Taking everyday morality perspective, the present study dedicates itself to investigate the real-life moral dilemmas university students personally have experienced in their everyday lives.45 undergraduate students and postgraduate students participated in this study.The foci in this study were on what issues people perceived their real-life moral dilemmas as involving as well as how they resolved the conflicts inherent in these issues.The findings indicated that(1)most of real-life moral dilemmas were different from the hypothetical dilemmas involving conflicts between moral norms.Moral content lied mainly in the issues people addressed.Individuals differed in both how many issues and what issues they read into or saw in different types of real-life moral dilemmas.(2)the appropriate strategies people advocated for handling moral problems wore somewhat different from those they applied in their real-life moral dilemmas.In particular, there wore more self-serving and pragmatic concerns in real-life moral decision.In addition, people relied on consideration of consequences especially harm when evaluating moral actions.

Key words: real-life moral dilemma, everyday morality, moral domain, moral function

中图分类号:

B844.2

李茵, 徐文艳. 高校学生道德困境研究:日常德性的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 39-45.

LI Yin, XU Wen-yan. Study on real-life moral dilemmas among university students:Everyday morality perspective[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(3): 39-45.

参考文献

[1] Campbell R L, Christopher J C.Moral development theory:A critique of its Kantian presuppositions.Developmental Review, 1996, 16:1-47.
[2] Gilligan C.In a different voice.Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1982.
[3] Walker L J.Progress and prospects in the psychology of moral development.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2004, 50(4):546-556.
[4] Walker L, Henning K H.Moral development in the broader context of personality.In Hala, S.(Ed.), The development of social cognition. East Sussex:Psychology Press, 1997:297-327.
[5] Walker L J, Henning, K.H.Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity:Just, brave, and caring.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 86(4):629-647.
[6] Walker L J, Pitts, R C.Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity. Developmental Psychology, 1998, 34:403-419.
[7] Walker L J, Pitts R C, Henning K H, Matsuba M K.Reasoning about morality and real-life moral problems.In Killen, M, Hart D.(Eds.), Morality in everyday life:Developmental perspectives.Cambridge University Press, 1995:371-407.
[8] 马庆强.中国人之感性与认知方面的道德发展.见杨国枢, 本土心理学.台北:桂冠图书, 1996:166-211.
[9] Wark G R, Krebs, D L.Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgment.Developmental Psychology, 1996, 32:220-230.
[10] Wark G R, Krebs D L.Sources of variation in real-life moral judgment:Toward a model of real-life moral problems.Journal of Adult Development, 1997, 4:163-178.
[11] Wark G R, Krebs D L.The construction of moral dilemmas in everyday life.Journal of Moral Education, 2000, 29(1):5-21.
[12] Blasi A.Moral identity:Its role in moral functioning.In Kurtines, W.M., Gewirtz, J.L.(Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development.New York:Wiley, 1984:128-139.
[13] Walker L J.Cognitive processes in moral development.In Sapp, G.L.(Ed.), Handbook of moral development:Models, processes, techniques, and research.Birmingham, Al:Religious Education Press, 1986:109-145.
[14] Blasi A.How should psychologist define morality?Or, the negative side effects of philosophy's influence on psychology.In Wren, T. (Ed.), The moral domain:Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences.New York:Wiley, 1990:128-139.
[15] Trevethan S D, Walker L J.Hypothetical versus real-life moral reasoning among psychopathic and delinquent youth.Development and Psychopathology, 1989, 1:91-103.
[16] Wygant S.Moral reasoning about real-life dilemmas:Paradox in research using the defining issues test.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997, 10:1022-1033.
[17] Quinn R A, Houts A, Graesser A C.Naturalistic conceptions of morality:A question-answering approach.Journal of Personality, 1994, 62 (2):240-262.
[18] Shelton C M, McAdams D P.In search of an everyday morality: The development of measure.Adolescence, 1990, 25:923-942.
[19] Juujarvi S.Care and justice in real-life moral reasoning.Journal of Adult Development, 2005, 12(4):199-210.
[20] Matsuba M, Walker L J.Young adult moral exemplars:The making of self-through stories.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2005, 15 (3):275-297.
[21] Walker L J.The perceived personality of moral exemplars.Journal of Moral Education, 1999, 28(2):145-162.
[22] Walker L J, de Vries, B, Trevethan S D.Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas.Child Development, 1987, 58:842-858.
[23] Walker L J, Moran T J.Moral reasoning in a communist Chinese society.Journal of Moral Education, 1991, 20:139-155.
[24] Hart D.Can prototypes inform moral developmental theory? Developmental Psychology, 1998, 34(3):420-423.
[25] Flectcher G J O.The scientific credibility of folk psychology. Mahwah, NJ:Erbaum, 1995.
[26] 李茵、黄蕴智.内隐理论的历史视野与当代探索:概念澄清与方法学讨论.北京大学教育评论, 2005, 4:101-112.
[27] 段文阁、高晓虹.真实的道德冲突对个体道德成长的意义. 伦理学研究, 2007, 6:60-63.
[28] 高德胜.日常生活遭遇和意外与道德学习.教育研究与实验, 2005, 4:13-15.
[29] 傅维利.真实的道德冲突与学生的道德成长.教育研究, 2005, 3:13-16。
[30] Gilligan C, Attanucci J.Two moral orientations:Gender differences and similarities.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1988, 34:223-237.
[31] Krebs D L, Denton K, Wark G R.The forms and functions of real-life moral decision2making.Journal of Moral Education, 1997, 26(2): 131-143.
[32] Rorty A O.What it takes to be good.In Noam, G.G., Wren, T.E.(Eds.), The Moral Self.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press, 1993:28-55.

相关文章 15

[1]	王帆, 方晓义, 胡伟, 陈海德, 吴梦希, 唐芹. 家庭环境与高中生发展:自主的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 585-593.
[2]	鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 王艳辉, 孙文强, 赵力燕. 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力：子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 482-495.
[3]	孙鹏, 邹泓, 杜瑶琳. 青少年创造性思维的特点及其对日常创造性行为的影响：人格的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 355-362.
[4]	张光珍, 梁宗保, 邓慧华, 陆祖宏. 学校氛围与青少年学校适应：一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 371-379.
[5]	赖雪芬, 张卫, 鲍振宙, 王艳辉, 熊庆龙. 父母心理控制与青少年抑郁的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 293-302.
[6]	宋静静, 李董平, 谷传华, 赵力燕, 鲍振宙, 王艳辉. 父母控制与青少年问题性网络使用：越轨同伴交往的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 303-311.
[7]	侯珂, 邹泓, 刘艳, 金灿灿, 蒋索. 同伴团体对青少年问题行为的影响：一项基于社会网络分析的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 259-267.
[8]	郭海英, 朱婉灵, 朱倩, 朱茂玲, 左培颖, 林丹华. 亲子沟通与农村青少年幸福感的关系：基本心理需要满足的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 129-136.
[9]	邓林园, 武永新, 孔荣, 方晓义. 冲动性人格、亲子沟通对青少年网络成瘾的交互作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 169-176.
[10]	胡阳, 范翠英, 张凤娟, 谢笑春, 郝恩河. 青少年网络受欺负与抑郁：压力感与网络社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 177-184.
[11]	苑春永, 邵爱惠, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 青少年儿童不爱社交、同伴排斥和同伴侵害的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 16-23.
[12]	戴艳, 雷鸣, 周宵, 姚梅, 蒋林洁, 陈希, 刘瑶. 创伤暴露程度对中学生创伤后应激障碍的影响：复原力的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 61-67.
[13]	周宵, 安媛媛, 伍新春, 陈和琼, 龙超敏. 汶川地震三年半后中学生的感恩对创伤后成长的影响：社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 68-74.
[14]	叶宝娟, 刘建平, 杨强. 感觉寻求对工读生病理性网络使用的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 96-104.
[15]	张景焕, 满达呼, 刘桂荣, 张舜, 窦菲菲, 林崇德. 父母教养方式对小学高年级学生社会创造力的影响：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 595-603.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed