激活水平对两亚型ADHD儿童反应执行与抑制能力的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究选取了混合型ADHD儿童14名,注意缺陷型ADHD儿童16名以及正常儿童18名,考察了在不同激活水平下,两亚型ADHD儿童之间,及其与正常儿童之间的反应执行能力与抑制能力的异同。采用传统的go/no-go任务,并将刺激间的时间间隔设置为1秒、4秒、8秒三种条件,分别对应高、中、低三种激活水平。结果发现,(1)与正常儿童相比,ADHD儿童的反应执行能力更容易受到激活水平的影响,且两亚型ADHD儿童受到的影响模式基本一致。具体而言:在高激活水平下,ADHD儿童与正常儿童差异最小;在中、低激活水平下,ADHD儿童与正常儿童差异增大,表明ADHD儿童状态调节能力落后。(2)两亚型ADHD儿童的功能缺损模式不同,混合型儿童在状态调节和反应抑制两方面都存在缺损,且其反应抑制缺陷不受激活水平影响;注意缺陷型儿童仅在状态调节方面受损。

关键词: ADHD, 亚类型, 激活, 状态调节, 反应抑制

Abstract: A total of 48 primary school students(14 ADHD-C,16 ADHD-I and 18 mental normal children)were chosen. The study compared the different abilities of response execution and response inhibition between two ADHD subtypes children as well as compared these two subtypes with mentally normal children on different activation levels.The traditional goΠno2go task was administered at three levels of inter-stimulus interval of 1s,4s,and 8s.It was found as follow:(1)the ability of response execution of ADHD children was strongly dependent on the activation level,suggesting that they suffered from poor state regulation ability.The effects of activation level on response execution ability in two subtypes of ADHD were similar.The difference between ADHD and control children was smaller in the 1s condition than in the 4s and 8s conditions;(2)ADHD/C and ADHD/I had different models of deficits,ADHD/C suffered from state regulation disability and response inhibition deficit.Their response inhibition deficit was independent of activation level. ADHD/I only suffered from state regulation disability.

Key words: ADHD, subtype, activation, state regulation, response inhibition

中图分类号:

G442

金颖, 刘翔平, 张微, 兰彦婷. 激活水平对两亚型ADHD儿童反应执行与抑制能力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(4): 81-86.

JIN Ying, LIU Xiang-ping, ZHANG Wei, LAN Yan-ting. The Effects of Activation Level on Response Execution and Inhibition in Children of two ADHD Subtypes[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(4): 81-86.

参考文献

[1] 刘翔平,刘雪梅,齐建芳.注意力缺损多动障碍的影响因素研究.心理发展与教育,1999(1):13-17.
[2] American Psychiatric Association(APA).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder,4thed(DSM2IV).Washington,DC:American Psychiatric Press,1994:80.
[3] Barkley R A.Behavioral inhibition,sustained attention and executive functions:constructing a unified theory of ADΠHD.Psychological Bull,1997,121:65-94.
[4] Quay H C.Theories of ADHD.Journal of the American Academy Child Psychology.1988,27:262-263.
[5] Oosterlaan J,Logan GD,Sergeant J A.Response inhibition in ADΠ HD,CD,comorbid ADΠHD+CD,anxious,and control children:A meta-analysis of studies with the stop task.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,1998,39:411-425.
[6] 张微,刘翔平,王博等.三种亚型ADHD儿童在停止信号任务上的表现个案研究.中国心理卫生杂志,2007,(21)9:601-602.
[7] Nigg J T.Neuropsychologic theory and findings in Attention 2DeficitΠ Hyperactivity Disorder:The state of the field and salient challenges for the coming decade.Biology of Psychiatry,2005,57:1424-1435.
[8] Wilding J.Is attention impaired in ADHD?British Journal of Developmental Psychology,2005,23(4):487-505.
[9] Douglas,V I.Cognitive control processes in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.In Quay H C,Hogan A E,Handbook of disruptive behavior disorders.New York:Plenum Press,1999:105-138.
[10] Sergeant J A.The cognitive-energetic model:an empirical approach to Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,2000,24:7-12.
[11] Hockey G R J,Hamilton P.The cognitive patterning of stress states.In Hockey G R J,Stress and fatigue in human performance.New York:Wiley,1983:1-32.
[12] Van der Meere J,Stemerdink N.The Development of state regulation in normal children:An indirect comparison with children with ADHD.Developmental Neuropsychology,1999,16:213-225.
[13] Sanders A.Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica,1983,53:61-67.
[14] Van der Meere J,Vreeling,H J,Sergeant,J A.A motor presetting experiment in hyperactive,learning disabled and control children. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry,1992,33:1347-1354.
[15] Scheres A,Oosterlaan J,Sergeant J A.Response execution and inhibition in Children with ADΠHD and other disruptive disorders:The role of behavioural activation.Child Psychology and Psychiatry.2001,42:347-357.
[16] Leth 2Steensen C,Elbaz Z K,Douglas V I.Mean response times, variability,and skew in the responding of ADHD children:a response time distributional approach.Acta Psychologica,2000,104:167-190.
[17] Hervey A S,Epstein J N,Curry J F,et al.Reaction time distribution analysis of neuropsychological performance in an ADHD sample. Child Neuropsychology,2006,12:125-140.
[18] Milich R,Balentine A C,Lynam D R.ADHD combined type and ADHD predominantly inattentive type are distinct and unrelated disorders. Clinical Psychology:Science and Practice,2001,8:463-488.
[19] Chhabildas N,Pennington B F,et al.A comparison of the neuropsychological profiles of the DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,2001,29(6):529-540.
[20] Parasuraman R,Warm J,See J.Brain systems of vigilance.In Parasuraman R.The Attentive Brain.Cambridge,MA:MIT press,1998: 221-256.
[21] Geurts H M,Grasman R P,VertéS,et al.Intra-individual variability in ADHD,autism spectrum disorders and tourette's syndrome. Neuropsychologia,2008,46:3030-3041.

相关文章 12

[1]	马小凤, 周爱保, 杨小娥. 线索强度:检验提取练习效应内部机制的重要变量[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 313-320.
[2]	屈晓兰, 凌宇, 孟红, 陈屈峰. 儿童句子错误记忆:发展性逆转现象及精加工推理效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 265-272.
[3]	孟泽龙, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 发展性阅读障碍亚类型研究进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 113-121.
[4]	昂晨, 吕欢, 周亚聪, 李博闻, 王瑞明. 词汇熟悉度对非熟练中英双语者语言理解转换中非目标语言激活的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 26-32.
[5]	李文福, 龚正霞, 邱江, 张庆林. 午睡剥夺对科学发明问题解决中的原型启发效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(2): 165-170.
[6]	丁颖, 杨双. 不同特征维度下ADHD儿童的任务切换特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 581-587.
[7]	丁颖, 杨双. 错误意识判断对ADHD儿童错误觉察的影响特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 362-367.
[8]	张微, 刘翔平, 宋红艳. 前摄抑制对儿童注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和阅读障碍的言语工作记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(2): 28-34.
[9]	刘卫卫, 刘翔平, 钟姝. 不同亚型ADHD儿童的视通道时距估计能力[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(3): 30-35.
[10]	郑淑杰. 9岁行为退缩儿童亚类型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(3): 26-29,35.
[11]	张微, 刘翔平, 金颍. ADHD儿童的选择性抑制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 29-33.
[12]	张树东, 董奇. 一～四年级小学生发展性计算障碍的亚类型研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 76-81.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed