心理发展与教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 830-839.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.06.07

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    

视觉大细胞-背侧通路干预下阅读障碍儿童的应答机制研究

戴琳1,2, 任筱宇1,3, 赵婧3, 毕鸿燕1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室;中国科学院心理研究所脑科学与学习困难研究中心, 北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049;
    3. 首都师范大学心理学院, 北京市"学习与认知"重点实验室, 北京 100037
  • 发布日期:2025-11-05
  • 通讯作者: 毕鸿燕, 赵婧 E-mail:bihy@psych.ac.cn;conanzj@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(31871117)。

Research on Response Mechanism of Dyslexic Children to Intervention on the Visual Magnocellular-dorsal Pathway

DAI Lin1,2, REN Xiaoyu1,3, ZHAO Jing3, BI Hongyan1,2   

  1. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science; Center for Brain Science and Learning Difficulties, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101;
    2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
    3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037
  • Published:2025-11-05

摘要: 基于视觉大细胞-背侧通路理论,考察游戏化训练干预后,有、无应答的发展性阅读障碍儿童在认知特征和缺陷方面的差异,为视觉大细胞-背侧通路功能在汉语阅读中的作用机制提供理论启示。从北京市某小学与某医院筛选出2~5年级阅读障碍儿童23名,并对其进行为期7周的视觉大细胞-背侧通路游戏化干预。在干预前、后分别对阅读障碍儿童的视觉大细胞-背侧通路功能、阅读及阅读相关能力进行测试。使用后测数据,参照干预-应答模式将阅读障碍儿童划分为应答组与无应答组,并比较两组被试前测时的认知特征及缺陷情况。结果表明:(1) 只有部分阅读障碍儿童能成为应答者;(2) 无应答者在图片快速命名、正字法意识、语素意识和语音意识测试中的前测成绩要显著低于应答者;(3) 图片快速命名、语音意识可显著预测干预应答效果。个体可能需要具备一定的图片快速命名和语音意识基础,才能通过视觉大细胞-背侧通路功能训练提升其阅读能力。

关键词: 发展性阅读障碍, 干预-应答模式, 图片快速命名, 语音意识

Abstract: The article explores how the visual magnocellular-dorsal (M-D) pathway affects Chinese reading by investigating how children with developmental dyslexia respond to a game-based intervention that targets the function of M-D pathway and comparing the cognitive profiles and weaknesses of responders and non-responders. The intervention was conducted for 7 weeks with 23 dyslexics from Grades 2 to 5. The M-D pathway function, reading and reading-related abilities of these children were assessed before and after the intervention. Based on the Response to Intervention model, these children were classified into two groups according to their post-test results: a response group and a non-response group. The cognitive profiles and weaknesses of the two groups were then compared. The results showed that: (1) Only some dyslexics became responders; (2) The non-response group had significantly lower scores than the response group in the pre-test measures of rapid picture naming, orthographic awareness, morpheme awareness and phonological awareness; (3) Rapid picture naming and phonological awareness were significant predictors of the response intervention effect. Hence, the improvement of Chinese reading ability through the M-D pathway may depend on a certain level of rapid picture naming ability and phonological awareness.

Key words: developmental dyslexia, response to intervention, rapid picture naming, phonological awareness

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Lien, M. C., Kaut, K. P., & Canfield, A. (2009). A multistream model of visual word recognition. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71(2), 281-296.
Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(8), 617-629.
Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., … Halgren, E. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(2), 449-454.
Barth, A. E., Stuebing, K. K., Anthony, J. L., Denton, C. A., Mathes, P. G., Fletcher, J. M., & Francis, D. J. (2008). Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder status. Learning and individual Differences, 18(3), 296-307.
Beach, K. D., & O’Connor, R. E. (2015). Early response-to-intervention measures and criteria as predictors of reading disability in the beginning of third grade.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 196-223.
Bisley, J. W., Krishna, B. S., & Goldberg, M. E. (2004). A rapid and precise on-response in posterior parietal cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 24(8), 1833-1838.
Boden, C., & Giaschi, D. (2007). M-stream deficits and reading-related visual processes in developmental dyslexia. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 346-366.
Bolzani, R., Benassi, M., Facoetti, A., Finzi, A., Giovagnoli, S., Gummel, K. K., & Vicari, S. (2006). Developmental dyslexia is a multifactor disorder: The neuropsychological approach. Perception, 35, 91-92.
Burns, M. K., & Senesac, B. V. (2005). Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria to assess response to intervention.Journal of School Psychology, 43(5), 393-406.
Case, L. P., Speece, D. L., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review, 32(4), 557-582.
Chouake, T., Levy, T., Javitt, D. C., & Lavidor, M. (2012). Magnocellulartraining improves visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Aricle 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00014
Chung, K. K. H., McBride-Chang, C., Wong, S. W. L., Cheung, H., Penney, T. B., & Ho, C. S. H. (2008). The role of visual and auditory temporal processing for Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Annual of Dyslexia, 58, 15-35.
Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79-122.
Denton, C. A., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Bryan, D. (2008). Intervention provided to linguistically diverse middle school students with severe reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 79-89.
Ebrahimi, L., Pouretemad, H., Khatibi, A., & Stein, J. (2019). Magnocellular based visual motion training improves reading in Persian.Scientific Reports, 9(1), Article 1142. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41598-018-37753-7
Facoetti, A., Corradi, N., Ruffino, M., Gori, S., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Visual spatial attention and speechsegmentation are both impaired in preschoolers at familial risk for developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16(3), 226-239.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness- to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria.Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(4), 216-227.
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20-25.
Goswami, U. (2011). A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 3-10.
Innes, K., Hooper, J., Bramley, M., & DahDah, P. (2002). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision, Australian modification (ICD-10AM). Tabular list of diseases. Health Information Management Journal, 27(1), 31-38.
Ji, Y., & Bi, H. Y. (2020). Visual dysfunction in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia: Magnocellular-dorsal pathway deficit or noise exclusion deficit?Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00958
Kaplan, E. (2003). The M, P and K pathways in the primate visual system. In L. M. Chalupa, & J. S. Werner (Eds.), The visual neurosciences, 2-vol. set (pp. 481-494). The MIT Press.
Kaplan, E., & Shapley, R. M. (1986). The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(8), 2755-2757.
Kim, N., Jang, S., & Cho, S. (2018). Testing the efficacy of training basic numerical cognition and transfer effects to improvement in children’s math ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1775. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01775
Lawton, T. (2011). Improving magnocellular function in the dorsal stream remediates reading deficits.Optometry & Vision Development, 42, 142-154.
Lawton, T. (2016). Improving dorsal stream function in dyslexics by training figure/ground motion discrimination improves attention, reading fluency, and working memory.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, Article 397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00397
Lawton, T., & Shelley-Tremblay, J. (2017). Training on movement figure-ground discrimination remediates low-level visual timing deficits in the dorsal stream, improving high-level cognitive functioning, including attention, reading fluency, and working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00236
Liu, P. D., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). What is morphological awareness? Tapping lexical compo- unding awareness in Chinese third graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 62-73.
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception.Science, 240(4853), 740-749.
Meng, X. Z., Cheng-Lai, A., Zeng,B., Stein, F., & Zhou, X. L. (2011). Dynamic visual perception and reading development in Chinese school children. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(2), 161-176.
Menghini, D., Finzi, A., Benassi, M., Bolzani, R., Facoetti, A., Giovagnoli, S.,… Vicari, S. (2010). Different underlying neurocognitive deficits in developmental dyslexia: A comparative study. Neuropsychologia, 48(4), 863-872.
Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities.Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 427-452.
Qian, Y., & Bi, H. Y. (2015). The visual magnocellular deficit in Chinese speaking children with developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg. 2014.00692
Qian, Y., Bi, Y. C., Wang, X. S., Zhang, Y. W., & Bi, H. Y. (2016). Visual dorsal stream is associated with Chinese reading skills: A resting-state fMRI study. Brain and Language, 160, 42-49.
Qian, Y., Deng, Y., Zhao, J., & Bi, H. Y. (2015). Magnocellular-dorsal pathway function is associated with orthographic but not phonological skill: fMRI evidence from skilled Chinese readers. Neuropsychologia, 71, 84-90.
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Blachman, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., … Gore, J. C. (2005). Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically- based intervention. Biological Psychiatry, 55(9), 926-933.
Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S., & Liu, H. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia: Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 122-133.
Snowling, M. J. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7(1), 37-46.
Stein, J. (2001). The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia.Dyslexia, 7(1), 12-36.
Stein, J. (2014). Dyslexia: The role of vision and visual attention.Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(4), 267-280.
Stein, J., & Walsh, V. (1997). To seebut not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neurosciences, 20(4), 147-152.
Valdois, S., Bosse, M. L., & Marie-Josèphe, T. (2004). The cognitive deficits responsible for developmental dyslexia: Review of evidence for a selective visual attentional disorder. Dyslexia, 10(4), 339-363.
Vanbecelaere, S., Van den Berghe, K., Cornillie, F., Sasanguie, D., Reynvoet, B., & Depaepe, F. (2020). The effects of two digital educational games on cognitive and non-cognitive math and reading outcomes.Computers & Education, 143, Article 103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019. 103680
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601-638.
Vidyasagar, T. R., & Pammer, K. (2010). Dyslexia: A deficit in visualspatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(2), 57-63.
Wang, L. C., Liu, D., & Xu, Z. (2019). Distinct effects of visual and auditory temporal processing training on reading and reading-related abilities in Chinese children with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 69(2), 166-185.
Xu, Q., Tao, S., Li, S., Wang, W., Li, B., & Joshi, R. (2021). Who are the nonresponders to intervention among Chinese children learning English as a second language? Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 213-229.
Yu, X. D., Lu, F.,& Jiang, L. F. (2006). Vision training and its effects on reading speed in low vision children. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, 8, 325-327.
Zhao, J., Bi, H. Y., & Coltheart, M. (2017). Different relationship of magnocellular-dorsal function and reading-related skills between Chinese developing and skilled readers.PLoS ONE, 12(7), Article e0179712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179712
Zhao, J., Qian, Y., Bi, H. Y., & Coltheart, M. (2014). The visual magnocellular-dorsal dysfunction in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia impedes Chinese character recognition. Scientific Reports, 4(1), Article 7068. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07068
黄旭, 吴汉荣, 静进, 邹小兵, 王梦龙, 李秀红, … 周鹏. (2007). 汉语阅读障碍儿童在快速命名时的眼动特征. 中国心理卫生杂志, 21(6), 358-361.
季雨竹. (2019). 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童视觉加工困难的认知神经机制(博士学位论文).中国科学院大学, 北京.
刘芳芳, 左彭湘, 唐淑婷, 高小焱, 何红瑶. (2021). 发展性阅读障碍儿童视觉注意广度及动作视频游戏干预效果研究. 中国学校卫生, 42(11), 1665-1669.
刘丽, 何茵. (2018). 汉语发展性阅读障碍的认知神经机制研究及教育启示. 教育发展研究, 38(24), 64-72.
刘宁宇, 赵婧, 黄晨, 邢晓沛, 卢珊, 王争艳. (2018). 学前期视觉快速序列加工技能对早期流畅阅读能力发展的预测作用: 以快速命名技能为中介[摘要]. 见 中国心理学会 (编). 第二十一届全国心理学学术会议摘要集 (pp. 467-468). 中国心理学会.
牟晓宇, 昝飞. (2011). 美国特殊儿童学业困难反应模式——RTI模式. 外国教育研究, 38(4), 54-59.
钱怡, 赵婧, 毕鸿燕. (2013). 汉语学龄前儿童正字法意识的发展. 心理学报, 45(1), 60-69.
任筱宇. (2022). 基于视觉大细胞-背侧通路功能的游戏化训练对汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童阅读能力的影响 (硕士学位论文). 首都师范大学,北京.
王翠翠, 徐琴芳, 陶沙. (2016). 干预-应答模式鉴别学习障碍的有效性及其调节因素: 20年研究的元分析. 心理发展与教育, 32(6), 706-716.
王孝玲, 陶保平. (1996). 小学生识字量测试题库及评价量表. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
谢为伊. (2014). 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的时间加工学习 (硕士学位论文). 北京大学.
徐琴芳. (2015). 美国基于RTI模式的学习障碍测量研究综述. 现代特殊教育(高教), (22), 3-11.
杨洁, 徐芬, 任萍, 张瑞平. (2007). 幼儿期汉语语音意识和英语语音意识的发展. 心理科学, 30(6), 1418-1421.
张厚粲, 王晓平. (1985). 瑞文标准推理测验手册: 中国城市修订版. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
赵婧, 毕鸿燕, 钱怡. (2013). 视觉大细胞通路对汉字识别的影响. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 40(2), 141-146.
中华医学会精神病学分会. (2001). 中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第三版(精神障碍分类). 中华精神科杂志, 34(3), 184-188.
周湾. (2018). 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童语音意识和正字法意识干预研究 (硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
[1] 姜莹, 盖笑松, Jenny Thomson. 音-义连接经验对自然拼读教学法效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 368-376.
[2] 谢瑞波, 方园园, 伍新春, 阮世芳, 赵英. 小学中年级儿童成语理解的发展轨迹及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 68-76.
[3] 孙赛男, 何文广. 语音加工的发展、老化及其神经机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 894-901.
[4] 孟红霞, 白学军, 谭珂, 苏娟. 发展性阅读障碍的视觉拥挤效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 762-768.
[5] 刘涵隆, 赵婧. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童视觉注意广度的发展及其对阅读流畅性的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 533-540.
[6] 李何慧, 陶伍海, 彭聃龄, 丁国盛. 发展性阅读障碍与脑异常的因果关系:研究范式及发现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 631-640.
[7] 张玉平, 董琼, 舒华, 吴燕. 语音意识、命名速度和语素意识在汉语阅读发展中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 401-409.
[8] 孟泽龙, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 发展性阅读障碍亚类型研究进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 113-121.
[9] 王翠翠, 徐琴芳, 陶沙. 干预-应答模式鉴别学习障碍的有效性及其调节因素:20年研究的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 706-716.
[10] 姜薇, 张林军, 舒华. 汉语语音范畴性知觉在儿童早期阅读中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 271-278.
[11] 王晓辰, 李其维, 李清. 小学汉语阅读障碍儿童的PASS认知加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 569-576.
[12] 李蓓蕾, 陶沙, 董奇. 英语语音意识在汉语儿童英语单词阅读及拼写中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(4): 388-393.
[13] 李虹, 饶夏溦, 董琼, 朱瑾, 伍新春. 语音意识、语素意识和快速命名在儿童言语发展中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 158-163.
[14] 刘文理, 伊廷伟, 杨玉芳. 汉语语音型阅读障碍儿童的范畴知觉技能[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 569-576.
[15] 李虹, 舒华. 学前和小学低段不同识字量儿童的认知能力比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 1-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!