心理发展与教育 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 105-112.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.01.12

• 理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

主客体互倚性的成对模式及其检验

刘畅1,2, 伍新春2   

  1. 1. 北京教育学院学前教育学院, 北京 100120;
    2. 北京师范大学心理学院, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2017-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 伍新春,E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    北京市教育科学“十二五”规划2015年度课题“父亲与母亲教养投入对青少年心理适应影响的比较研究”（AFA15199）。

Dyadic Patterns in the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model and its Testing

LIU Chang1,2, WU Xinchun2   

  1. 1. Preschool Academy, Beijing Institute of Education, Beijing 100120;
    2. School of Psychology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2017-01-15 Published:2017-01-15

PDF (PC)

被引次数

2

摘要： 主客体互倚性模型（APIM）以成对数据作为分析单元，是成对数据分析的重要方法。基于APIM中的主体效应与客体效应，Kenny等人论述了APIM的四种成对模式：主体模式、客体模式、对偶模式与对比模式。通过定义客体效应与主体效应的比值为k，Kenny等人提出了定量指标，以分析主客体互倚性的成对模式。成对模式分析有助于简化数据结果、检验理论模型、解析群体互动过程。虽然k值的检验程序较为复杂，但APIM成对模式及k值的提出，对于成对数据分析，特别是家庭研究与组织心理学研究具有重要意义。

关键词: 主客体互倚性模型, 主体模式, 客体模式, 对偶模式, 对比模式

Abstract: APIM is an important analytic approach of dyadic data, and its analysis unit is dyad. Based on the actor and partner effects, Kenny and Ledermann discussed four general APIM dyadic patterns:the actor-only, the partner-only, the couple, and the contrast patterns. Then Kenny and Ledermann defined k as the ratio of the partner effect to the actor effect. By estimating k, researchers have a quantitative index of the relative size of the partner effect. Researchers can simplify the results and analyze the process of group interaction through dyadic patterns. On the basis of example, both advantage and limitation were discussed.

Key words: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model, actor-only pattern, partner-only pattern, couple pattern, contrast pattern

中图分类号: 

  • B844

APIM kPaper. Retrieved March 8, 2015, from http://davidakenny.net/papers/k_apim/k_apim.htm

Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model:A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies.International Journal of Behavioral Development,29(2), 101-109.

Garcia, R. L., Meagher, B. R., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Analyzing the effects of group members' characteristics:A guide to the group actor-partner interdependence model.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,18(3), 315-328.

Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research:Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations.Personal Relationships,6(4), 433-448.

Kenny, D. A., & Garcia, R. L. (2012). Using the actor-partner interdependence model to study the effects of group composition.Small Group Research,43(4), 468-496.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006).Dyadic data analysis. New York:Guilford Press.

Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor-partner interdependence model.Journal of Family Psychology,24(3), 359-366.

Kivlighan Jr, D. M., & Paquin, J. D. (2014). Whose perceptions matter more:Mine or my group's? An actor-partner interdependence analysis disaggregating between-person and between-session effects of group climate perceptions on intimate behaviors.Journal of Counseling Psychology,61(3), 333-339.

Little, T., D., & Card, N., A. (2005). On the use of social relations and actor-partner interdependence models in developmental research.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2),173-179.

Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal,18(4), 595-612.

Mushquash, A. R., Stewart, S. H., Sherry, S. B., Mackinnon, S. P., Antony, M. M., & Sherry, D. L. (2013). Heavy episodic drinking among dating partners:A longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,27(1), 178-183.

Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads.Psychological Methods,11(2), 127-141.

Ponnet, K., Mortelmans, D., Wouters, E., Van Leeuwen, K., Bastaits, K., & Pasteels, I. (2013). Parenting stress and marital relationship as determinants of mothers' and fathers' parenting.Personal Relationships,20(2), 259-276.

Rindskopf, D. (1984). Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models.Psychometrika,49(1), 37-47.

Wickham, R. E., & Knee, C. R. (2012). Interdependence theory and the Actor-partner interdependence model:Where theory and method converge.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 375-393.

陈玲玲, 伍新春, 刘畅. (2014). 父母的婚姻满意度对父亲教养投入的影响:父母协同教养的中介作用.心理发展与教育,30(3), 268-276.

李育辉, 黄飞. (2010). 成对数据分析之行动者-对象互依性模型 (APIM).心理科学进展,18(8), 1321-1328.
[1] 张云运, 黄美薇, 任萍, 张瑞平. 朋友的学业成就会影响我的学业成就吗？——成对友谊关系中成就目标取向的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 54-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发