从毕生发展的角度看个体分类倾向的两次转变——材料的生命性和可操作性的作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.05.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究从毕生发展的视角考察了个体分类倾向的发展轨迹,并探讨任务材料内容可能对其产生的影响。选取幼儿园、小学、中学、大学和中老年个体各30名作为研究对象,记录他们面对不同的分类材料(有/无生命、高/低可操作性)的分类倾向。结果表明个体的分类倾向经历了两次转变:(1)进入小学后主题分类倾向逐渐降低,并在2、3年级时最低;(2)进入中学之后,个体逐渐恢复对主题分类倾向的偏好,中学和大学的个体面对含有生命体或是可操作性高的材料会比面对非生命体或可操作性低的材料时,更倾向于使用主题分类的策略。这一结果表明,个体对不同材料内容的分类倾向的发展轨迹存在差异,研究结果有助于理解个体概念组织的形成和发展过程。

关键词: 主题分类, 分类学分类, 生命性, 可操作性, 毕生发展

Abstract: The current study focused on the developmental trajectory of the object categorization tendency of an individual, and the influence of the categorical content. We recruited subjects from kinder-garden, primary school, middle school, college and middle-aged and elderly groups, each of which has 30 individuals respectively. We recorded their categorization tendency when facing different materials (living/non-living, high/low manipulability). Results showed that (1)there were two transformations of the object categorization tendency during the development. Thematic categorization tendency decreased after children starting school. It reached the lowest point at grade 2. (2)Children would gradually regain their preference towards the thematic categorization after entering secondary school. When the middle school students and undergraduates faced the object categorization task containing animated or highly operable materials, they preferred to use thematic categorization strategy. The results indicate that the contents of the materials play a different role in the development of categorization tendency during one's whole life. These results would help us understand the formation and development of an individual's concept organization.

Key words: thematic relation, taxonomic relation, animated materials, manipulable materials, lifespan development

中图分类号:

B844

廖宗卿, 张佳昱, 苏彦捷. 从毕生发展的角度看个体分类倾向的两次转变——材料的生命性和可操作性的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(5): 531-538.

LIAO Zongqing, ZHANG Jiayu, SU Yanjie. The Two Transformations of An Individual's Object Categorization Tendency with A Lifespan View: The Role of the Living Character and Manipulability of the Materials[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(5): 531-538.

参考文献

Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends of Cognitive Science, 7(1), 84-91.

Behl-Chadha, G. (1996). Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy. Cognition, 60(2), 105-141.

Chao, L. L., Weisberg, J., & Martin, A. (2002). Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex, 12(5), 545-551.

Chen, Q., Li, P., Xi, L., Li, F., Lei, Y., & Li, H. (2013). How do taxonomic versus thematic relations impact similarity and difference judgments? An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 90(2), 135-142.

de Zubicaray, G. I., Hansen, S., & McMahon, K. L. (2013). Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 131-142.

Ji, L. J., Zhang, Z. Y., & Nisbett, R. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(1), 57-65.

Kalénine, S., & Bonthoux, F. (2008). Object manipulability affects children and adults conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 667-672.

Kalénine, S., Peyrin, C., Pichat, C., Segebarth, C., Bonthoux, F., & Baciu, M. (2009). The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI study. Neuroimage, 44(3), 1152-1162.

Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14(3), 201-206.

Li, D., Gao, K., Zhang, Y., & Wu, X. (2012). Chinese deaf and hard of hearing adolescents' awareness of thematic and taxonomic relations among ordinary concepts represented by pictures and written words. American Annals of the Deaf, 156(5), 476-491.

Maintenant, C., Blaye, A., & Paour, J. L. (2011). Semantic categorical flexibility and aging: Effect of semantic relations on maintenance and switching. Psychology and Aging,26(2), 461-466.

Maintenant, C., Blaye, A., Pennequin, V., & Paour, J. L. (2013). Predictors of semantic categorical flexibility in older adults. British Journal of Psychology, 104(2), 265-282.

Markman, E. M., & Hutchinson, J. E. (1984). Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16(1), 1-27.

McPherron, S. P., Alemseged, Z., Marean, C. W., Wynn, J. G., Reed, D., Geraads, D., et al. (2010). Evidence for stone-tool-assisted consumption of animal tissues before 3.39 million years ago at Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature, 466(7308), 857-860.

Mirman, D., & Graziano, K. M. (2012). Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 601-609.

Murphy, G. (2001). Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: A test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(4), 834-839.

Ozgen, E. (2004). Language, learning, and color perception. American Psychological Society,13(3), 95-98.

Pennequin, V., Fontaine, R., Bonthoux, F., Scheuner, N., & Blaye, A. (2006). Categorization deficit in old age: Reality or artefact? Journal of Adult Development, 13(1), 1-9.

Sachs, O., Weis, S., Krings, T., Huber, W., & Kircher, T. (2008). Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: Neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 409-418.

Smiley, S. S., & Brown, A. L. (1979). Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28(2), 249-257.

Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Lee, M. (2008). Designing multimedia games for young children's taxonomic concept development. Computers and Education, 50(3), 1037-1051.

Yi, K., Li, D., Park, W. S., Park, K., Shim, T., Kwern, O., & Kim, J. Y. (2011). Korean deaf adolescents' awareness of thematic and taxonomic relations among ordinary concepts represented by pictures and written words. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,16(3), 375-391.

蔡太生, 周世杰. (1998). 5-16岁儿童分类概括能力发展的研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 12(4), 213-215.

陈友庆, 阴国恩. (2002). 儿童分类发展的特点及影响因素的实验研究. 天津师范大学学报: 社会科学版, (6), 67-72.

成军. (2006). 范畴化及其认知模型. 四川外语学院学报, 22(1), 65-70.

戴斌荣, 阴国恩, 俞国良. (2007a). 材料呈现方式、维度数量对小学生分类活动影响的眼动研究. 心理科学,30(4), 820-823.

戴斌荣, 阴国恩, 俞国良. (2007b). 呈现方式对小学生和大学生分类影响的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育,23(4), 63-67.

方富熹, 方格, 郗慧媛. (1991). 学前儿童分类能力再探. 心理科学,23(1), 16-22.

卢勤, 苏彦捷. (2003). 对Bem性别角色量表的考察与修订. 中国心理卫生杂志,17(8), 550-553

宋娟, 吕勇. (2008). 类别表征与策略的脑科学研究及对思维教学的启示. 心理与行为研究,6(1), 75-80.

王文忠, 方富熹. (2001). 幼儿分类能力发展研究综述. 心理学动态,9(3), 210-214.

张佳昱, 苏彦捷. (2008). 主题还是分类学? 对事物分类倾向的发展研究. 心理科学,31(6), 1322-1325.

张丽锦,方富熹,杨小冬. (2004). 学前儿童朴素生物学理论及其获得机制. 心理科学进展,12(3), 371-378.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed