考试制度信任对大学生学业投入意向的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对制度公平性的感知会影响人们对制度的信任,如果人们相信考试制度是公平的,每个人在这样的制度安排下拥有平等的机会,是否会愿意将更多的时间和精力投入到学习中呢?研究1通过启动119名和112名本科三年级学生对考研制度的信任与不信任,考察其对学业投入意向的影响,结果发现相比在考研制度不信任条件下,信任条件下个体的学业投入意向更高.研究2通过启动被试对一般考试制度的信任与不信任,考察其对学业投入意向的影响,结果表明即使不是和个体直接相关的某项具体考试制度,仅仅是对一般考试制度的信任也能有效影响个体学业投入意向.

关键词: 制度信任, 学业投入意向, 考研制度, 一般考试制度

Abstract: Perceptions of the fairness of the social institution may affect individual's trust in institutions. To our knowledge, however, there were no experimental studies examining how institutional trust affected individuals' academic engagement intention. By priming the trust or distrust of two samples consisted of 119 and 112 junior students, Study 1 explored how the people's institutional trust in the graduate school entrance exam affected academic engagement intention. The result showed that academic engagement intention was significantly higher under the condition of institutional trust than under the condition of institutional distrust. Study 2 examined the effects of the people's institutional trust in the graduate school entrance exam, civil service examination and recruitments on academic engagement intention. The result indicated that trust in the general examination institutions can also have effect on participants' academic engagement intention. In a word, examination institutional trust can increase the college students' academic engagement intention.

Key words: institutional trust, academic engagement intention, the institution of graduate school entrance exam, general examination institutions

中图分类号:

B844.3

刘有辉, 辛自强, 明朗. 考试制度信任对大学生学业投入意向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 380-386.

LIU You-hui, XIN Zi-qiang, MING Lang. Impacts of Examination Institutional Trust on College Students' Academic Engagement Intention[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(4): 380-386.

参考文献

Ahnquist, J., Lindstrom, M., & Wamala, S. P. (2008). Institutional trust and alcohol consumption in Sweden: The Swedish national public health survey 2006. BMC Public Health, 8(283), 1-10.

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.

Bekkers, R. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 596-615.

Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924-973.

Benabou, R., & Ok. E. A. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 447-487.

Bennett, R. (2003). Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 12-29.

Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(3), 200-215.

Buckley, K. E., & Anderson, C. A. (2006). A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of playing video games. In Vorderer, P., & Bryant, J. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences(pp.363-378). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Retrieved January 14, 2014 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=13.

Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2012). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1649-1660.

Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225-241.

Evers, A., & Gesthuizen, M. (2011). The impact of generalized and institutional trust on donating to activist, leisure, and interest organizations: individual and contextual effects. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 381-392.

Fabrigar, L. R., Petty, R. E., Smith, S. M., & Crites, S. L. (2006). Understanding knowledge effects on attitude-behavior consistency: The role of relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 556-577.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

Gibbs, R., & Poskitt, J. M. (2010). Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (years 7-10): A literature review. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Gonida, E. N., Voulala, K., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2009). Students' achievement goal orientations and their behavioral and emotional engagement: Co-examining the role of perceived school goal structures and parental goals during adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 53-60.

Harper, A. R. (2008). American male undergraduates and social capital realizing the intended outcomes of Brown: High-achieving African. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(7), 1030-1053.

Johnson, R. M. (2012). Exploring ethnic differences in the predictors and outcomes of academic engagement during middle school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Portland State University, Portland.

Kindermann, T. A. (1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children's motivation in school. Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 970－977.

Krause, K. (2007). New perspectives on engaging first year students in learning. Retrieved February 17, 2014, from http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/37490/FYEEngagemtGriffith2007.pdf.

Letki, N. (2006). Investigating the roots of civic morality: Trust, social capital, and institutional performance. Political Behavior, 28(4), 305-325.

Lowery, B. S., & Wout, D. A., (2010). When inequality matters: The effect of inequality frames on academic engagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 956-966.

Major, B. N., Quinton, W. J., & Schmader, C. (2003). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(3), 220-231.

Major, B., & Schmader, T. (1998). Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. In J. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The targe's perspective (pp. 219-241). New York: Academic.

McIntyre, D.J., Copenhaver, R.W., Byrd, D.M., & Norris, W.R. (1983). A study of engaged student behaviour within classroom activities during mathematics class. Journal of Educational Research, 77(1), 55-59.

Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 376-404.

Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children's behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 781-791.

Schmader, T., Major, B., & Gramzow, R. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: Perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 93-111.

Simons-Morton, B. G., & Crump, A. D. (2003). Association of parental involvement and social competence with school adjustment and engagement among sixth graders. Journal of School Health, 73(3), 121-126.

Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts. European Psychologist, 18(2), 136-147.

Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877-895.

李景国, 李艳磊 (2011). 论制度公正在促进人的全面发展中的意义. 理论界, 4, 30-32.

李岚 (2001). 社会转型期我国制度信任的现状研究. 未出版博士论文. 南京大学, 南京.

宋洁绚 (2009). 基于国家主义的高等学校招生考试制度研究. 未出版博士论文. 华中科技大学, 武汉.

陶芝兰, 王欢 (2006). 信任模式的历史变迁——从人际信任到制度信任. 北京邮电大学学报 (社会科学版), 8(2), 20-23.

赵泉民 (2013). 论转型社会中政府信任的重建——基于制度信任建立的视角. 社会科学, 1, 12-24.

相关文章 15

[1]	陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 594-600.
[2]	李晓彤, 王雪玲, 王大华, 燕磊. 青年子女的传统孝观念及其与早期父母教养行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 601-608.
[3]	刘兆敏, 张琼林. 青少年脑发育的神经法学研究与应用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 656-663.
[4]	侯珂, 刘艳, 屈智勇, 蒋索. 留守对农村儿童青少年社会适应的影响:倾向值匹配的比较分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 646-655.
[5]	陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音. 具身道德:道德心理学研究的新取向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 664-672.
[6]	陈浩彬, 汪凤炎. 大学生智慧内隐认知的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 363-370.
[7]	邢学玮, 伍新春, 侯建芳, 刘畅, 陈玲玲. 父亲的角色态度对其教养投入的影响：母亲态度类型的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 387-395.
[8]	王岩, 王大华, 付琳, 姜薇, 翟晓艳. 老年人夫妻依恋稳定性及其与配偶支持的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 396-402.
[9]	项紫霓, 张兴慧, 黎亚军, 王耘, 李燕芳. 3~5岁儿童母亲抚养压力类型特点及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 427-434.
[10]	陈禹, 任国防, 李海江, 杨瑜, 关丽丽, 胡新雨, 杨娟. 自尊与心理性应激反应的关系：社会认可需求的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 435-441.
[11]	王钢, 张大均, 刘先强. 幼儿教师职业压力、心理资本和职业认同对职业幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 442-448.
[12]	黄一帆, 王大华, 肖红蕊, 姜薇. DRM范式中错误记忆的年龄差异及其机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 24-30.
[13]	侯志瑾, 周宵, 陈杰灵, 朱莉, 倪竞, 陈淑芳. 中小学教师PTSD和PTG的影响因素研究：灾难前-中-后的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 82-89.
[14]	陈杰灵, 伍新春, 曾盼盼, 周宵, 熊国钰. PTSD与PTG的关系：来自教师群体的追踪研究证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 75-81.
[15]	曲可佳, 邹泓. 家庭社会经济地位、父母教养行为与大学生职业生涯探索的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(5): 500-506.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed