心理发展与教育 ›› 2000, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 30-35.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

效能信念、加工方式和困难应对策略——关于自我调节学习的特点及各成分间关系的探讨

汪玲1, 雷雳1, Tanja CULJAK2   

  1. 1. 首都师范大学教科院心理系, 100089;
    2. 克罗地亚University of Zagreb
  • 出版日期:2000-07-15 发布日期:2000-07-15
  • 作者简介:汪玲,女,(1972- ),湖北人,首都师范大学心理系讲师,博士

Efficacy Beliefs Processing Style and Failure-coping Strategy: Characteristics of Self-regulated Learning and the Relationships among Its Components

汪玲1, 雷雳1, Tanja CULJAK2   

  1. 1. 首都师范大学教科院心理系, 100089;
    2. 克罗地亚University of Zagreb
  • Online:2000-07-15 Published:2000-07-15

摘要: 自我调节学习是一个复杂的系统,效能信念、加工方式、应对策略分别反映着自我调节学习的动机、认知、行为侧面。本研究通过对效能信念、加工方式、应对策略三者进行相关分析,探讨了自我调节学习各成分之间的关系;同时,对于自我调节学习各成分与学业成绩之间的关系亦作了探讨。在这两部分研究结论的基础上,提出了自我调节学习的理想模式,并对被试群体自我调节学习的现有状况与这一理想模式进行了对照。

关键词: 自我调节学习, 效能信念, 加工方式, 应对策略

Abstract: Self-regulated learning involves not only cognitive aspect,but also motivational and behavioral components,while there are few studies on the whole structure of self-regulated learning and the relationship among its components. The present study explored the relationship among efficacy beliefs, processing style and failure-coping strategy,as well as the relationship among these variables and study performance.

Key words: self-regulated learning Efficacy beliefs Processing style Coping strategy

中图分类号: 

  • G442
[1] Carver,C.S.&Scheier,M.(2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In M.Boekaerts,P.R.Pintrich,& M.Zeidner(Eds),Handbook of self-regulation(Chap.3)San Diego.CA:Academic Press.
[2] Zimmerman,B.J.(1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition:A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist,30(4),217-221.
[3] Niemivirta,M.(1998),Individual Differences in Motivational and Cognitive Factors Affecting Self-Regulated Learning:A Pattern-Oriented Approach U:Nenniger P.,Jager R.S.,Frey A.&Wosnitza M.(Eds). Advances in Motivation. Landau:Verlag Empirische Padagogik.
[4] Bandura,A.(1982). The self and mechanisms of agency. In J. Suls(Ed). Psychological perspectives on the Self. Vol.1 Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,117-148.
[5] Chapman,M.,Skinner,E.A.&Baltes,P.B.(1990), Interpreting correlations between children's perceived control and cognitive performance:Control,agercy,or means-ends beliefs? Development Psychology,26(2),246-253.
[6] 张鼎昆,方俐洛,凌文辁(1999):自我效能感的理论及研究现状,《心理学动态》7(1)39-43
[7] Niemivirta,M.(1998). Individual Differences in Motivational and Cognitive Factors Affecting Self-Regulated Learning:A Pattern-Oriented Approach. U:Nenniger P.,Jager R.S.,Frey A.&Wosnitza M.(Eds). Advances in Motivation,Landau:Verlag Empirische Padagogik.
[8] Tero,P.E.&Connol P.J.(1984). When children think they've failed:An academic coping inventory Unpublished Manuscript. University of Rochester.
[9] Mantzicopoulos. P.(1990).Coping sith school failure: Characteristics of students employing successful and unsuccessful coping strategies. Psychology in the Schools 27,138-143.
[1] 李红霞, 张佳佳, 赵霞, 司继伟, 黄碧娟. 大学生认识论信念、自我调节学习与学业拖延的联系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 557-565.
[2] 张俊, 刘儒德, 贾玲. 反馈在自我调节学习中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 218-224.
[3] 高丙成, 刘儒德, 王丹, 和美君, 袁稹. 初中生自我调节学习的类型及对学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 76-82.
[4] 姚恩菊, 陈旭, 韩元亚. 胜任力和应对策略对教师职业压力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(2): 103-108.
[5] 刘志军. 初中生乐观主义与其学业成绩的关系及中介效应分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(3): 73-78.
[6] 李田伟, 陈旭, 廖明英. 社会支持系统在中学生学业压力源和应对策略间的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(1): 35-40.
[7] 方晓义, 张锦涛, 刘钊. 青少年期亲子冲突的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 19(3): 46-52.
[8] 李伟, 陶沙. 大学生应对策略的特点及其与社会支持水平关系的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 17(3): 68-73.
[9] 雷雳, 汪玲, Tanja CULJAK. 优生与差生自我调节学习的对比研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 6-11.
[10] 杨阿丽, 方晓义, 林丹华. 父母冲突、青少年应对策略及其与青少年社会适应的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(1): 37-43.
[11] 刘儒德, 陈琦. 学习目标要求和时间压力对多媒体环境下自我调节学习活动的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(2): 32-36.
[12] 陈琦, 吴志功, 苗逢春. 年轻大学生忧虑的问题、应对策略和寻求帮助的行为[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1998, 14(4): 26-31.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!