心理发展与教育 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 31-35.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

顿悟的原型启发效应机制探索

吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林   

  1. 西南大学心理学院, 教育部认知与人格重点实验室, 重庆, 400715
  • 出版日期:2008-01-15 发布日期:2008-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 张庆林,西南大学心理学院教授.E-mail:zhangql@swu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangql@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    西南大学国家重点学科“基础心理学”项目资助(项目编号:NSKD06002)

Exploring the Mechanism for Prototype Elicitation Effect in Insight

WU Zhen-zhen, QIU Jiang, ZHANG Qing-lin   

  1. School of Psychology, Southwest University, Key laboratory of personality and cognition, Ministry of Education, Beibei, Chongqing 400715, China
  • Online:2008-01-15 Published:2008-01-15

摘要: 以中国传统的字谜作为实验材料,采用"多个原型字谜学习-多个目标字谜测试"两阶段实验范式,对顿悟过程的原型启发机制进行了探讨.考察了原型启发效应是否会受第一阶段学习的原型字谜的数量以及启发量大小的影响,结果发现:学习的原型字谜的数量对原型启发效应的大小没有显著影响;启发量高低对原型启发效应的大小有显著影响.这一结果支持了"原型字谜的激活是一种自动加工、原型字谜中所隐含的关键启发信息的激活是一种控制加工"的观点.

关键词: 顿悟, 原型事件, 字谜, 实验范式

Abstract: This study selected logogriph(a riddle about a Chinese Character) problem as the material and investigated the theory of the activation of prototypal matters in insight problem solving through the "Xvs.X(X=3,6,9)" learning and testing experimental paradigm,and explored whether the activation of prototypal matters was effected by the increasing of the amount of learning and the elicitation index.The results showed that:(1) the activation of prototypal matters wasn't effected evidently by the increasing of the amount of learning;(2) "elicitation" was an effective index and it greatly effected the activation of prototypal matters;(3) the results supported the idea that the activation of the prototypal matters came as a result of automatic processing and the activation of heuristic information in prototypal matters maybe the result of automatic processing.

Key words: insight, prototypal matters, logogriph, experimental paradigm

中图分类号: 

  • B842.1
[1] Kaplan C A,Simon H A.In search of insight.Cognitive Psychology,1990,22,374-419.
[2] MacGregor J N,Ormerod T C,Chronicle E P.Information processing and insight:A process model of pedormance on the nine-dot and related problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,& Cognition,2001,27(1):176-201.
[3] Ormered T C,MacGregor J N,Chronicle E P.Dynsmics and constraints in insight problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,& Cognition,2002,28(4):791-799.
[4] Chronicleg P,MacGregor J N,Ormered T C.What makes an insight problem? The roles of heuristics,goal conception,and solution recoding in knowledge-lean problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Lenming,Memory,& Cognition,2004,30(1):14-27.
[5] 张庆林,邱江,曹贵康.顿悟认知机制的研究述评与理论构想.心理科学,2004,27(6):1435-1437.
[6] 曹贵康.顿悟问题解决的原型事件激活:自动还是控制.心理科学,2006,29(5):1123-1127.
[7] 张庆林,邱江.顿悟与原型中启发信息的激活.心理科学,21105,28(1):6-9.
[8] 任国防.顿悟:是进程监控还是表征转换.西南师范大学心理学院硕士论文,2005.
[9] Luo J,Niki K,Phillips S.The function of anterior cingulate cortex(ACC) in insightful puzzle solving:ACC activated less when the structure of the puzzle was known.Journal of Psychololgy in Chinese Societies,2004,5:195-213.
[10] Mai X Q,Luo J,Wu J H,Luo Y J."Aha!" effects in guessing riddle task:An ERP study.Human Brain Mapping,2004,22:261-270.ERP 效应.心理学报,2006,38(4):507-514.
[11] 邱江,罗跃嘉,吴真真,张庆林.再探猜谜作业中"顿悟"的ERP效应.心理学报,2006,38(4):507-514.
[1] 张忠炉, 易俊如, 张竹青, 邢强, 雷怡, 李红. 部件类型还是交错关系信息的习得促进问题解决?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[2] 陈群林, 罗俊龙, 蒋军, 位东涛, 张庆林. 无意识加工对创造性问题解决的促进效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 569-575.
[3] 窦东徽, 金萍, 蔡亮. 基于线索的顿悟问题解决:图式和表征操作的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 9-14.
[4] 赵彤, 张奇. 影响9点问题解决的关键行为[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(3): 75-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!