大学生自我同一性状态与同一性风格、亲子沟通的关系

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用问卷法对594名大学生进行调查,结果发现,大学生自我同一性状态的人数分布中,延缓状态占67.5%,其余三种同一性状态各占10%左右;大学生在四种同一性状态的人数分布上不存在年级差异和性别差异;与其他同一性状态相比,获得状态的大学生在信息风格上得分最高,早闭状态的大学生在规范风格上得分最高,扩散状态的大学生在扩散风格上得分最高;亲子沟通中的开放性和问题既对同一性状态有直接预测作用,又以三种同一性风格为中介间接影响同一性状态。

关键词: 自我同一性, 自我同一性状态, 同一性风格, 亲子沟通

Abstract: 594 college students were investigated using the revised Extend Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status-2, Identity Style Inventory-3 and Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale.The results indicated as follows:(1)college students in the moratorium status were 6715 per cent,and students in the other three statuses were about 10 per cent,respectively;(2)no grade differences and gender differences were found on the distribution of four identity statuses;(3) in contrast with students in the other three statuses,college students in the achievement status scored higher in the informational style,forclosures scored higher in the normative style,and diffusions scored higher in the diffuse style;(4) openness and problem in parent-adolescent communication had both direct and indirect influences on the identity statuses.Indirect influences were moderated by the identity styles.

Key words: ego identity, ego identity status, identity style, parent-adolescent communication

中图分类号:

B844.2

王树青, 张文新, 张玲玲. 大学生自我同一性状态与同一性风格、亲子沟通的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(1): 59-65.

WANG Shu-qing, ZHANG Wen-xin, ZHANG Ling-ling. Ego Identity Status,Identity Style and Parent-Adolescent Communication in College Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(1): 59-65.

参考文献

[1] Erikson E.Identity:Youth and crisis.New York:Norton,1968.
[2] Marcia J E.Development and validation of ego identity status.Journal of personality and social psychology,1966,3:215-223.
[3] Berzonsky M D.Self-construction over the life span:A process perspective on identity formation.In G.J.Neimeyer & R.A.Neimeyer (Eds.),Advances in personal construct psychology (Vol.1,pp.155-186).Greenwich,CT:JAI Press,1990.
[4] Berzonsky M D.Identity style and coping strategies.Journal of Personality,1992,60,771-788.
[5] Waterman A.Identity development from adolescence to adulthood:An extension of theory and a review of research.Developmental Psychology,1982,18,341-358.
[6] Cramer P.Freshman to senior year:A follow-up of identity,narcissism,and defense mechanisms.Journal of Research in Personality,1998,32:156-172.
[7] 李文道.大学生同一性发展的特点及相关因素的研究.北京师范大学博士学位论文,2005.
[8] Kroger J.Gender and identity:The intersection of structure,content and context.Gender Roles,1997,36(11/12):747-770.
[9] Archer S L.A feminist's approach to identity.In G.R.Adams,T.P.Gullotta,& R.Montemayor (Eds.) Adolescent identity formation (pp.25-49).Newbury Park,CA:Sage Publications,1992.
[10] Barnes H L,Olson D H.Parent-adolescent communication scale.In D.H.Olson et al.,Famlily inventories:Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (pp.33-48).St.Paul:Famliy Social Science,University of Minnesota,1982.
[11] Grotevant H D,Cooper C R.Individuation in family relationships:A perspective on individual differences in the development of identity and role-taking skill in adolescence.Human Development,1986,29,82-100.
[12] Adams G R,Marshall S K.A developmental social psychological of identity:Understanding the person-in-context.Journal of Adolescence,1996,19:429-442.
[13] Berzonsky M D.Identity style,parental authority and identity commitment.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,2004,33:213-220.
[14] 王树青,张文新,纪林芹等.青少年自我同一性状态问卷的修订.中国临床心理学杂志,2006,3:221-223.
[15] Bennion L D,Adams G R.A revision of the extended objective measure of ego-identity status:An identity instrument for use with late adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Research,1986,1:183-198.
[16] 王树青,纪林芹,张文新.大中学生同一性风格问卷的初步修订.中国心理卫生杂志,2006,9:625.
[17] Berzonsky M D.Identity Style Inventory,Version 3.Unpublished measure,State University of New York at Cortland,1992.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘春晖, 刘思佳, 郭筱琳, 罗良. 母亲男孩偏好和亲子沟通的关系:子女性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 64-71.
[2]	刘文, 王依宁, 张嘉琪, 车翰博. 9~11岁儿童创造性人格与欺骗行为的关系:亲子沟通质量的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 508-516.
[3]	吴捷, 魏芙蓉, 李佳琪, 吴瑕. 高中生的亲子沟通质量对情绪性刺激注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 159-166.
[4]	牛更枫, 李占星, 王辰宵, 马晓彤, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. 网络亲子沟通对留守初中生社会适应的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 678-685.
[5]	柴唤友, 陈春宇, 段长英, 朱彩凤, 孙晓军. 网络亲子沟通与青少年抑郁的关系:线上社会资本的中介作用及其年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 112-120.
[6]	张梅, 张玥, 辛自强, 张乔红. 大学生网络同一性实验与自我同一性的关系:网络社交倾向和强迫性网络使用的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 98-105.
[7]	邓林园, 武永新, 孔荣, 方晓义. 冲动性人格、亲子沟通对青少年网络成瘾的交互作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 169-176.
[8]	王树青, 张光珍, 陈会昌. 大学生亲子依恋、分离-个体化与自我同一性状态之间的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 145-152.
[9]	郭海英, 朱婉灵, 朱倩, 朱茂玲, 左培颖, 林丹华. 亲子沟通与农村青少年幸福感的关系：基本心理需要满足的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 129-136.
[10]	池丽萍. 亲子沟通的三层次模型:理论、工具及在小学生中的应用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 140-150.
[11]	王树青, 石猛, 陈会昌. 大学生自我同一性状态与“大五”人格、因果取向的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 495-501.
[12]	池丽萍. 亲子沟通观察研究的编码方案及其整合[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(4): 438-444.
[13]	王树青, 陈会昌, 石猛. 青少年自我同一性状态的发展及其与父母教养权威性、同一性风格的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 65-72.
[14]	谭锐, 周晖. 父母表露与青少年人际能力的关系研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 60-64.
[15]	杨晓莉, 邹泓. 青少年亲子沟通的特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 49-54.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed