心理发展与教育 ›› 2003, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 23-28.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

幼儿心理理论表现的任务特异性分析

邓赐平   

  1. 华东师范大学心理学系, 上海, 200062
  • 出版日期:2003-07-15 发布日期:2003-07-15
  • 作者简介:邓赐平(1970- ),男,福建人,华东师范大学心理学系讲师,博士.dengcp@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(批准号:30000055)

A examination on task-specificity of young children’s theory-of-mind performance

DENG Ci-ping   

  1. Department of Psychology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062
  • Online:2003-07-15 Published:2003-07-15

摘要: 研究以90名3~5岁幼儿为被试,采用相同材料和标准评估幼儿外表-事实的区分和错误信念认识,考察幼儿表现的任务特异性及材料刺激的影响。结果表明;幼儿的表现仍存在任务特异性,并且实验材料对儿童的外表-事实区分和错误信念认识具有重要影响。在解释这些结果时,特殊领域知识习得观似乎优于表征缺失理论。

关键词: 心理理论发展, 外表-事实的区分, 错误信念认识, 任务特异性

Abstract: Ninety Chinese 3~5-year-olders' understanding of appearance-reality distinction and false belief were examined in a series of tasks with different materials,and the task-specificity of young children's performance and the effect of material on performance were also explored in the study.It was found that young children's performance on these two theory-of-mind tasks showed to be markedly task-specific,even the assessment standards of appearance-reality distinction and false belief understanding were matched in these tasks.The results also showed that there was a great material effect on young children's performance on both appearance-reality distinction tasks and false belief understanding tasks.It seemed that these results favored the hypothesis of domain-specific knowledge acquisition (Carey,1985) than the representation-deficit hypothesis (Flavell,1988; Perner,1991).

Key words: development of theory-of-mind, appearance-reality distinction, understanding of false belief, task specificity

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Flavell J H.The development of children's knowledge about the mind:From cognitive connections to mental representation.In J.W.Astington,P.L.Harris,& D.R.Olson (Eds.),Developing theories of mind.New York:Cambridge University Press,1988,244-270.
[2] Perner J.Understanding the representational mind.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1991.
[3] Flavell J H,Green F L,Flavell E R.Development of knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction.Monographs of Society for Research in Child Development,1986,51(1,Serial No.212).
[4] Moses L J,Flavell J H.Inferring false beliefs from action and reaction.Child Development,1990,61,929-945.
[5] Wimmer H,Hartl M.Against the Cartesian view of mind:young children's difficulty with own false belief.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1991,9,125-138.
[6] Gopnik A,Astington J W.Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and appearance-reality distinction.Child Development,1988,59,26-37.
[7] Moore C,Pure K,Furrow D.Children's understanding of modal expression of speaker certainty and uncertainty and its relation to the development of a representational theory of mind.Child Development,1990,61,722-730.
[8] 邓赐平,桑标,缪小春.幼儿心理理论的一般认知基础-不同心理理论任务表现的特异性与一致性.心理科学,2002,5:531-534.
[9] Dalke D E.Explaining young children's difficulty on the false belief task:Representational deficits or context-sensitive knowledge.? British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1995,13,209-222.
[10] Jenkins J M,Astington J W.Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children.Developmental Psychology,1996,32,70-78.
[11] 邓赐平,桑标.不同任务情境对幼儿心理理论表现的影响.心理科学,2003,2:272-275.
[12] Carey S.(1985) Conceptual change in childhood.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
[13] Carey S.(1985) Conceptual change in childhood.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
[14] Cheng P W,Holyoak K J,Nisbett R E,et al.Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,1986,18,293-328.
[15] Perner J,Clements W A.From an implicit to an explicit "theory of mind".In Y.Rossetti and A.Revonsuo (Eds.),Dissociation BUT interaction between conscious and nonconscious processing.Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1997.
[16] Leslie A.Pretending and believing:Issues in the theory of ToMM.Cognition,1994,50(1-3),211-238.
[1] 邓赐平, 刘明. 从假装到心理表征理论:假装认识训练的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(3): 1-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!