Psychological Development and Education ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 79-82,91.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Comparative Study on the Synergistic Learning of Implicit and Explicit Between Excellent Students and Students with Learning Disabilities

GE Cao1, SHEN De-li2, BAI Xue-jun2   

  1. 1. School of Education, Zhengzhou university, Zhengzhou 450001;
    2. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal university, Tianjin 300074
  • Online:2009-01-15 Published:2009-01-15

Abstract: According to the current standard,120 excellent students and 120 students with learning disabilities were selected.Bi-conditional artificial grammar letter strings and match-edit task paradigms in implicit learning research was used,this two kinds of students'implicit learning as well as the synergistic learning of implicit and explicit manipulation was to be compared.The results were as follows:(1)There was no significant difference in implicit learning performance between excellent students and students with learning disabilities.Performance of excellent students in explicit learning, the synergistic learning of implicit and explicit(first learn in implicit learning and then the explicit learning as well as the alternate learning)was significantly better than that of students with learning disabilities.(2)Scores of excellent students in explicit learning,and in the synergistic learning of implicit and explicit were significantly higher than the scores of implicit learning.There was no significant difference between the performances of students with learning disabilities among four kinds of learning styles.These results suggested that effect of conscious learning and its synergistic learning with unconscious learning for excellent students was better than unconscious learning,whereas effect of conscious learning and its synergistic learning with unconscious learning for the students with learning disabilities had no significant difference with unconscious learning.

Key words: excellent students, students with learning disabilities, implicit learning, explicit learning, synergistic learning of implicit and explicit

CLC Number: 

  • G442
[1] Mathews R C,Buss R R,Stanley W B,et al.Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples:A synergistic effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1989,15(6): 1083-1100.
[2] Mathews R C.Is research painting a biased picture of implicit learning?The dangers of methodological purity in scientific debate. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,1997,4(1):38-42.
[3] 郭秀艳.内隐学习与外显学习关系评述.心理科学进展, 2004,12(2):185-192.
[4] Destrebeeqz A,Cleeremans A.Temporal effets in sequene learning.In Jimenez L.(Ed.)Attention and Implicit Learning,John Benjamins,2003:181-213.
[5] 郭秀艳,杨治良.内隐学习和外显学习的相互关系.心理学报,2002,34(4):351-356.
[6] Reber A S,Walkenfeld F F,Hernstadt R.Implicit and explicit learning-individual difference and IQ.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1991,17(5):888-896.
[7] 高湘萍,徐欣颖,李慧渊.儿童绘图作业内隐学习智力独立性研究.心理科学,2005,28(4):863-867.
[8] 吴国来.内隐序列学习的发展研究.天津师范大学博士论文,2004.
[9] 钟启泉.差生的心理与教育.上海教育出版社,2003:10-13.
[10] 沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究.心理科学, 2006,29(1):2-6.
[1] YANG Haibo, DONG Liang, ZHOU Wanru. Employing Signal Detection Theory and Structural Knowledge to Separate Knowledge Acquired from Artificial Grammar Learning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 10-16.
[2] LU Zhang-long, LV Yong, SHEN De-li. Attentional load has no Effect on Implicit Sequence Learning: Evidence from Event-Related Potential Studies [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(6): 561-568.
[3] Han, Xiu, Pei-yang-hong. The Effects of the College Students’ Intelligence and Cognitive Styles on Implicit Sequence Learning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(1): 48-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!