Psychological Development and Education ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 431-441.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.03.14
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Shuyun, HUANG Yanli, SHI Yujing, XIE Jiushu, DENG Zhu
CLC Number:
| Aussems, S., & Vogt, P. (2020). Adults use cross-situational statistics for word learning in a conservative way. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 12(2), 232-242. Baronchelli, A., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Pastor-Satorras, R., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2013). Networks in cognitive science.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(7), 348-360. Bassani, H. F., & Araujo, A. F. R. (2019). A neural network architecture for learning word-referent associations in multiple contexts.Neural Networks, 117, 249-267. Benitez, V. L., Bulgarelli, F., Byers-Heinlein, K., Saffran, J. R., & Weiss, D. J. (2019). Statistical learning of multiple speech streams: A challenge for monolingual infants. Developmental Science, 23(2), Article e12896. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12896 Benitez, V. L., Yurovsky, D., & Smith, L. B. (2016). Competition between multiple words for a referent in cross-situational word learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 31-48. Benitez, V. L., Zettersten, M., & Wojcik, E. (2020). The temporal structure of naming events differentially affects children’s and adults’ cross-situational word learning.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 200, Article e104961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104961 Berens, S. C., Horst, J. S., & Bird, C. M. (2018). Cross-situational learning is supported by propose-but-verify hypothesis testing. Current Biology, 28(7), 1132-1136. Bulgarelli, F., Weiss, D. J., & Dennis, N. A. (2020). Cross-situational statistical learning in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 28(3), 346-366. Escudero, P., Mulak, K. E., Fu, C. S. L., & Singh, L. (2016). Morelimitations to monolingualism: Bilinguals outperform monolinguals in implicit word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article e1218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01218 Gray, S., Lancaster, H., Alt, M., Hogan, T. P., Green, S., Levy, R., & Cowan, N. (2020). Thestructure of word learning in young school-age children. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 63(5), 1446-1466. Hartley, C., Bird, L.-A., & Monaghan, P. (2020). Comparing cross-situational word learning, retention, and generalisation in children with autism and typical development.Cognition, 200, Article e104265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104265 Hayakawa, S., Ning, S., & Marian, V. (2019). Fromklingon to colbertian: Using artificial languages to study word learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 74-80. Hendrickson, A. T., & Perfors, A. (2019). Cross-situational learning in aZipfian environment. Cognition, 189(6), 11-22. Ibbotson, P., Lopez, D. G., & McKane, A. J. (2018). Goldilocksforgetting in cross-situational learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article e1301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01301 Kachergis, G. (2018). Word learning: Associations or hypothesis testing? Current Biology, 28(9), R555-R557. Kachergis, G., & Yu, C. (2018). Observing and modeling developing knowledge and uncertainty during cross-situational word learning. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 10(2), 227-236. Kachergis, G., Yu, C., & Shiffrin,R. M. (2014). Cross-situational word learning is both implicit and strategic. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article e588. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00588 Kachergis, G., Yu, C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2016). A bootstrapping model of frequency and context effects in word learning. Cognitive Science, 41(3), 590-622. Khoe, Y. H., Perfors, A., & Hendrickson, A. T. (2019). Modeling individual performance in cross-situational word learning. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4rtw9 Lavi-Rotbain, O., & Arnon, I. (2021). Visual statistical learning is facilitated inZipfian distributions. Cognition, 206, Article e104492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104492 Lenhart, J., Lenhard, W., Vaahtoranta, E., & Suggate, S. (2020). More than words: Narrator engagement during storytelling increases children's word learning, story comprehension, and on-task behavior.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 51(2), 338-351. Medina, T. N., Snedeker, J., Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2011). How words can and cannot be learned by observation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(22), 9014-9019. Monaghan, P., & Mattock, K. (2012). Integrating constraints for learning word-referent mappings.Cognition, 123(1), 133-143. Mulak, K. E., Vlach, H. A., & Escudero, P. (2019). Cross-situationallearning of phonologically overlapping words across degrees of ambiguity. Cognitive Science, 43(5), Article e12731. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12731 Piantadosi, S. T. (2014). Zipf's word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1112-1130. Poepsel, T. J., & Weiss, D. J. (2016). The influence of bilingualism on statistical word learning.Cognition, 152(4), 9-19. Ralph, Y., Schneider, J. M., Abel, A., & Maguire, M. J. (2020). Using the N400 event-related potential to study word learning from context in children from low-and higher-socioeconomic status homes.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191(5), Article e104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104758 Rebuschat, P., Monaghan, P., & Schoetensack, C. (2021). Learning vocabulary and grammar from cross-situational statistics.Cognition, 206, Article e104475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104475 Roembke, T., & McMurray, B. (2020). Interactions of explicit and implicit learning mechanisms in cross-situational word learning. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3k7s8 Roembke, T. C., & McMurray, B. (2016). Observational word learning: Beyond propose-but-verify and associative bean counting.Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 105-127. Roembke, T. C., & McMurray, B. (2021). Multiple components of statistical word learning are resource dependent: Evidence from a dual-task learning paradigm.Memory & Cognition, 49(5), 984-997. Rooijen, R., Bekkers, E., & Junge, C. (2019). Beneficial effects of the mother’s voice on infants’ novel word learning.Infancy, 24(6), 838-856. Schuler, K. D., Reeder, P. A., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2017). The effect of Zipfian frequency variations on category formation in adult artificial language learning. Language Learning and Development, 13(4), 357-374. Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics.Cognition, 106(3), 1558-1568. Stevens, J. S., Gleitman, L. R., Trueswell, J. C., & Yang, C. (2017). Thepursuit of word meanings. Cognitive Science, 41(200), 638-676. Suanda, S. H., & Namy, L. L. (2012). Detailedbehavioral analysis as a window into cross-situational word learning. Cognitive Science, 36(3), 545-559. Tardif, T., & Wellman, H. M. (2000). Acquisition of mental state language in Mandarin- and Cantonese-speaking children.Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 25-43. Tek, S., & Naigles, L. (2017). The shape bias as a word-learning principle: Lessons from and for autism spectrum disorder.Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(1), 94-103. Trueswell, J. C., Medina, T. N., Hafri, A., & Gleitman, L. R. (2013). Propose but verify: Fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning.Cognitive Psychology, 66(1), 126-156. Trehub, S. E., & Shenfield, T. (2007). Acquisition of early words from single-word and sentential contexts.Developmental Science, 10(2), 190-198. Tsuji, S., Jincho, N., Mazuka, R., & Cristia, A. (2020). Communicative cues in the absence of a human interaction partner enhance 12-month-old infants’ word learning.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191, Article e104740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104740 Venker, C. E. (2019). Cross-situational and ostensive word learning in children with and without autism spectrum disorder.Cognition, 183(1), 181-191. Vlach, H. A., & DeBrock, C. A. (2019). Statistics learned are statistics forgotten: Children's retention and retrieval of cross-situational word learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(4), 700-711. Warren, D. E., Roembke, T. C., Covington, N. V., McMurray, B., & Duff, M. C. (2020). Cross-situational statistical learning of new words despite bilateral hippocampal damage and severe amnesia.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article e448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00448 Woodard, K., Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Two- and three-year-olds track a single meaning during word learning: Evidence for propose-but-verify.Language Learning and Development, 12(3), 252-261. Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics.Psychological Science, 18(5), 414-420. Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2012). Modeling cross-situational word-referent learning: Prior questions. Psychological Review, 119(1), 21-39. Yurovsky, D., & Frank, M. C. (2015). An integrative account of constraints on cross-situational learning.Cognition, 145, 53-62. Yurovsky, D., Fricker, D. C., Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2014). The role of partial knowledge in statistical word iclearning.Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 21(1), 1-22. Yurovsky, D., Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2013). Statistical word learning at scale:The baby's view is better. Developmental Science, 16(6), 959-966. Zettersten, M., Wojcik, E., Benitez, V. L., & Saffran, J. (2018). The company objects keep: Linking referents together during cross-situational word learning.Journal of Memory and Language, 99, 62-73. Zhang, X. P., & Dong, X. L. (2016). Revisiting Zipfian frequency: L2 acquisition of English prenominal past participles. The Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 404-427. Zhang, Y., Chen, C.-H., & Yu, C. (2019). Mechanisms of cross-situational learning: Behavioral and computational evidence. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 56, 37-63. Zhang, Y., Yurovsky, D., & Chen, Y. (2015). Statistical word learning is a continuous process: Evidence from the human simulation paradigm. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2793-2798). Cognitive Science Society. Zhang, Y., Yurovsky, D., & Yu, C. (2021). Cross-situationallearning from ambiguous egocentric input is a continuous process: Evidence using the human simulation paradigm. Cognitive Science, 45(7), Article e13010. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13010 任婷婷, 莫雷. (2015). 数据积累,还是假设检验?——幼儿早期词汇学习机制的研究[摘要]. 见第十八届全国心理学学术会议 (pp. 1232-1233). 中国心理学会. 朱莉琪, 孟祥芝, Tardif, T. (2011). 儿童早期词汇获得的跨语言/文化研究. 心理科学进展, 19(02), 175-184. |
| [1] | CHENG Yao, YANG Zhen, HUANG Xiu-mei, TAO Sha. The Development of Various Orthographic Skills and Their Roles in Learning to Read in English among Chinese Elementary School Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(1): 46-54. |
| [2] | WANG Teng-fei, LI Chun-hua, XU Fen, GUO Xiao-lin, LUO Xian-ming. The Role of Associative Learning and Working Memory in the Development of Fluid Intelligence [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(4): 337-343. |
| [3] | WANG En-guo, SHEN De-li, LV Yong, HU Wei, LI Yong-xin, CHEN Hai-xia. Chinese Language Learning Disabilities in the ERP Study Memory Encoding [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(2): 164-173. |
| [4] | ZHENG Xiao-bei, WANG Zheng-ke, LIU Dong-mei, XU Jie, LI Wen-ling, MENG Xiang-zhi. Phonological Instruction Promotes the Phonological Awareness and Knowledge of Letters of Children in Kindergarten [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(1): 66-71. |
| [5] | TAO Sha, FENG Yan-jiao, LI Wei. The Roles of Different Components of Phonological Awareness in English Reading among Mandarin-speaking Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(2): 82-92. |
| [6] | ZHANG Su-min, WANG Gui-ping. Mediating Role of Language Learning Anxiety in the Relationship between Tolerance of Ambiguity and English Language Learning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(4): 64-67. |
|
||
