Psychological Development and Education ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 184-191.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.02.07

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Relationship between Internet Teacher-student Interaction and Online learning Performance: The Mediating Effect of Internet Learning Self-efficacy and Internet Learning Motivation

DUAN Zhaohui1,2, HONG Jianzhong1   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Centra China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
    2. The High School Affiliated to Renmin University of China, Shenzhen 518116
  • Published:2019-04-19

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract: In this study, we recruited 544 college students who participated in online course to explore the relationship between internet teacher-student interaction and online learning performance, and the mediating effect of the internet learning self-efficacy and internet learning motivation. The results show that:(1) The relationship between each pair of internet teacher-student interaction, internet learning self-efficacy, internet learning motivation and online learning performance were all significantly positive; (2) The internet teacher-student interaction not only had a direct effect on online learning performance, but also had an indirectly effect on online learning performance through two ways:through internet learning self-efficacy and through the chain mediating effect of the internet learning self-efficacy and the internet learning motivation. This study helps to understand the mechanism of internet teacher-student interaction on the online learning performance, and provide advice on the development of online education.

Key words: university student, internet teacher-student interaction, internet learning self-efficacy, internet learning motivation, internet learning performance

Abeer, W., & Miri, B. (2014). Students' preferences and views about learning in a MOOC. Paper presented at the ERPA International Congress on Education. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education:Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118-126.
Bryant, J., & Bates, A. J. (2015). Creating a constructivist online instructional environment. TechTrends, 59(2), 17-22.
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement:A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 78-96.
Cetin-Dindar, A. (2015). Student motivation in constructivist learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 233-247.
Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn:An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997-1014.
Cummings, C., Mason, D., Shelton, K., & Baur, K. (2017). Active learning strategies for online and blended learning environments. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Flipped instruction:Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 88-114). PA:IGI Global.
Deng, R., & Benckendorff, P. (2017). A contemporary review of research methods adopted to understand students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(8), 601-607.
Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning:An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024-1033.
Frith, C. (1997). Motivation to learn. Retrieved 16. 01. 2014 from http://general.utpb.edu/FAC/keast_d/Tunebooks/pdf/Motivation.pdf
Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process:A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. From http://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/statswiki/FAQ/SobelTest, 2012.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs):Motivations and challenges. Educational research review, 12(Supplement C), 45-58.
Jacobs, A. J. (2013). Two cheers for Web U. New York Times, 162(56113), 1-7.
Jashapara, A., & Tai, W.-C. (2011). Knowledge mobilization through e-learning systems:Understanding the mediating roles of self-efficacy and anxiety on perceptions of ease of use. Information Systems Management, 28(1), 71-83.
Joo, Y.-J., Bong, M., & Choi, H.-J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.
Lee, J.K., & Lee, W.K. (2008). The relationship of e-learner's self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-learning environmental quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 32-47.
Maddux, J. E. (2016). Self-efficacy:The power of believing you can. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 55-60). New York:Oxford University Press.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters:Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121-131.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways:The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms:Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1-12.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society:The development of higher mental process. Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.
Wilson, B. G. (1996). Introduction:What is a constructivist learning environment? In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments (pp. 3-8). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
陈吉荣. (2016). 国外慕课研究最新发展述评. 外语教学与研究, 48(1), 118-127.
陈琦, 张建伟. (1998). 建构主义学习观要义评析. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), 6(1), 61-68.
陈勇. (2008). 网络外语学习中的动机研究(硕士学位论文). 上海外国语大学.
方杰, 张敏强, 邱皓政. (2012). 中介效应的检验方法和效果量测量:回顾与展望. 心理发展与教育, 28(1), 105-111.
贾斌. (2014). 师生交互对网络学习绩效的影响研究(硕士学位论文). 聊城大学.
贾斌, 徐恩芹, 张景生. (2013). 国内学习绩效研究发展综述. 电化教育研究, 34(11), 53-58.
雷玉菊, 周宗奎, 田媛. (2017). 网络学习环境下学习者的动机信念对学习投入的影响. 中国电化教育, 195(2), 82-88.
林毅夫. (2014). 挖掘慕课所蕴含的重大机遇. In 汤敏 (Ed.), 慕课革命 互联网如何变革教育 (Vol. 1). 北京:中信出版社.
石茹. (2015). 交互质量知觉, 动机信念与学习满意度的关系研究:情绪的中介作用(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
孙洪涛, 郑勤华, 陈丽. (2016). 中国 MOOCs 教学交互状况调查研究. 开放教育研究, 22(1), 72-79.
谢幼如, 刘春华, 朱静静, 尹睿. (2011). 大学生网络学习自我效能感的结构, 影响因素及培养策略研究. 电化教育研究, 213(10), 30-34.
熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20(5), 757-769.
徐恩芹. (2016). 师生交互影响网络学习绩效的实证分析. 电化教育研究, 37(9), 61-68.
阎秋娟. (2016). 国内慕课 (MOOCs) 研究进展. 图书馆理论与实践, 195(1), 19-24.
尹睿, 许丹娜. (2011). 网络学习环境与大学生学习自我效能感关系的研究报告. 电化教育研究, 220(8), 46-52.
张金磊, 王颖, 张宝辉. (2012). 翻转课堂教学模式研究. 远程教育杂志, 4(4), 46-51.
郑云翔. (2015). 新建构主义视角下大学生个性化学习的教学模式探究. 远程教育杂志, 33(4), 48-58.
[1] LIN Shuwei, SUN Binghai, HUANG Jiaxin, XIAO Weilong, LI Weijian. The Effect of Empathy on Generalized Reciprocity: The Mediating Effect of Self-other Overlap [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(4): 475-484.
[2] CHEN Chen, YAN Ting, LIN Chong-de. Perfectionism, Self-Esteem, and Academic Procrastination among Chinese University Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(4): 368-377.
[3] WANG Shu-qing, SHI Meng, CHEN Hui-chang. Ego Identity Status,"Big Five"Personality and Causality Orientation in University Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(5): 495-501.
[4] MA Li-jun, LI Jian-bin. The Effect of University Students’ Core Self-evaluation and Academic Burnout on Their Academic Tiresome [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(3): 101-106.
[5] GENG Xiao-wei, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Quan-quan. A Study of the Predictive Validity of Explicit and Implicit Self-esteem for Subjective Well-being of University Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(1): 97-102.
[6] LU Cui-ping. Relationship Between Thinking Style and Coping Style in University Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(4): 56-60.
[7] SONG Xing-chuan, JIN Sheng-hua. A Study on Beliefs of University Students’ from Different Grades and from Different major [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(1): 92-96.
[8] WANG Wei, LIU Li, ZHOU Ji, ZHOU Ning. Optimistic Bias toward AIDS/HIV Among Chinese University Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(1): 47-51.
[9] LI Wei, TAO Sha. Coping Strategies and Perceived Social Support among University Studnets: Its Relationship and Gender Difference [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2002, 17(3): 68-73.
[10] . Research on the Teaching Attitude of Normal University Students’ [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2000, 16(4): 61-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd